The Ruling Elite Political Culture in Contemporary Iran
- 1 Political Sciences, Tehran Markazi Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
- 2 Political Sciences, Tehran Markazi Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
History has showed us that development in every society depends on the elite political roles; hence, their viewpoints regarding socio-political programs and individuals’ needs have played a vital role in determining the fate of a specific society. Also, the elite political culture is considered as an effective factor in political development within the realm of political sociology. To this end, the current study sets out to put forward a precise definition of the political elite culture. In this respect, political elite is not defined in a general sense1 because 79 million Iranian people out of 80 million may regard themselves as elites. Rather, this term was used in a specific sense which was the term “Ruling Class” (Aron, 1991). Also, Moska utilized “the Ruling Class” and Lasswell employed the concept of “the Political Elite” (Badi, 2006). It is claimed that a non-participatory political culture rather than a participatory political one has been considered as one of the main serious reasons for the political underdevelopment; moreover, the elite political culture or ideology in the contemporary era has not been significantly influenced by the new tendencies and developments. Hence, such a culture has been regarded as the continuation of the old patrimonial culture. The present research employs the refined Gabriel Almondba’s model to answer the non-participatory political elite hypothesis during some specific periods of time.
- Aalam, A. R. (2009). Foundations of Politics (pp. 112-113). Tehran: Ney Publications.
- Aaron, R. (1991). Steps of Thought in Sociology (pp. 493-494, 518-519). Tehran: Cultural-Scientific Publications.
- Abtahi, A. (2003). Pathology of Iranian Political Culture. Politic Science Journal, 4, 39.
- Akhtarshahr, A. (2007). The Components of Political Socialization in a Theocracy (p. 52). Tehran: Diffusion of Culture and Ideas Publishing.
- Almond, & Powell, G. B. (1978) Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach (p. 50). Boston: Little Brown and Co.
- Almond, G. (2000). The Study of Political Culture in Lane Crothers Lockart Charles. Culture and Politics: A Reader, New York.
- Almond, G., & Sidney, V. (1956). Civic Culture, Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (pp. 34-42). New York: Brown and Company.
- Almondm, G., Paul, J., & Monte (1997). Comparative Politics: A Theoretical Framework (p. 77). Tehran: Manajement Publications.
- Azghandi, A. (1997). The Ineffectiveness of the Iranian Political Elite between Two Revolutions (1st ed., pp.175-176). Tehran: Ghomes Publishing.
- Bashirieh, H, (2004). History of Political Sociology of Iran (p. 809). Tehran: Contemporary Publications.
- Bottomore, T. B. (1990). Elites and Society (1st ed., p. 1-3). Tehran: Shiraz Publications.
- Chalabi, M. (1996). The Sociology of Order (1st ed., p. 25). Tehran: Ney Publications.
- Chilcott, R. (1999). Theories of Comparative Politics (pp. 343-344). Tehran: Rasa Institute of Cultural Publications.
- Daheshiar, H. (2002). America’s Foreign Policy Hegemony (pp. 171-174). Tehran: Khat-e-Sevom Publications.
- Dovorzheh, M. (1990). Political Sociology (p. 191). Tehran: Tehran University Press Publications.
- Eftekhari, A. (1999). The Changing Face of Homeland Security. Quarterly Strategic Studies Journal, 4, 35.
- Eslami Nodoushan, M. A. (1998). Iran and Its Solitude (2nd ed., p. 10). Tehran: Tehran Publishing Center.
- Ghazi-Moradi, A. (2010). Autority in Iran (pp. 351-362). Tehran: Ghomes Publications.
- Ghobad-Zadeh, N. (2002). Pathological Narrative of the Gap between System and People in the Second Decade of the Revolution (p. 133). Tehran: Culture of Dialogue Publications.