Passage of Proposition 20 in California in 2010 transferred the power to redistrict congressional seats from the state legislature to a new independent redistricting commission. The goals of this transfer were to increase electoral accountability, to reduce partisan bias, to promote greater transparency and to bolster public trust. In this paper, I analyze the impact of Proposition 20 on electoral accountability by examining its effect on electoral competitiveness and political polarization. The evidence in the paper demonstrates that Proposition 20 has enhanced competitiveness and reduced polarization but that these effects are modest to date.
Abramowitz, A. I., Brad, A., & Matthew, G. (2006). Incumbency, Redistricting, and the Decline of Competition in US House Elections. The Journal of Politics, 68, 75-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00371.x
Amoros, P. M., Socorro, P., & Ricardo, M. (2016). Closed Primaries versus Top-Two Primaries. Public Choice, 167, 21-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0328-5
Barone, M. (2002/2004/2012/2014). The Almanac of American Politics. Washington DC: National Journal Group.
Cain, B. E. (1985). Assessing the Partican Effects of Redistricting. The American Political Science Review, 79, 320-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1956652
Cain, B. E. (2012). Redistricting Commissions: A Better Political Buffer? Yale Law Journal, 121, 1808-1844.
Carson, J. L., Crespin, M. H., & Williamson, R. D. (2014). Reevaluating the Effects of Redistricting on Electoral Competition, 1972-2012. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 14, 162-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532440013520245
Carson, J. L., Crespin, M. H., Finocchiaro, C. J., & Rohde, D. W. (2007). Redistricting and Party Polarization in the US House of Representatives. American Politics Research, 35, 878-904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X07304263
Chen, J., & Rodden, J. (2013). Unintentional Gerrymandering: Political Geography and Electoral Bias in Legislatures. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 8, 239-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/100.00012033
Grainger, C. A. (2010). Who Draws the Lines in California? Journal of Law and Economics, 53, 545-567. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/605724
Jacobson, G. C. (1990). The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 334-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111450
Jacobson, G. C., & Kernell, S. (1981). Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kogan, V., & McGhee, E. (2012). Redistricting California: An Evaluation of the Citizens Commission Final Plans. The California Journal of Politics and Policy, 4, 1-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5070/P23K5Q
Kogan, V., & McGhee, E. (2013). Redistricting: Did Radical Reform Produce Different Results? In E. Rarick (Ed.), Governing California: Politics, Government, and Public Policy in the Golden State Berkley (pp. 151-174). Berkeley, CA: Berkley Public Policy Press.
Kogan, V., & Kousser, T. (2011). Great Expectations and the California Citizens Redistricting Commission. In G. Moncrief (Ed.), Reapportionment and Redistricting in the West (pp. 219-245). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Kousser, T., Phillips, J., & Shor, B. (2014). Reform and Representation: A New Method Applied to Recent Electoral Changes. Working Paper.
Mann, T. E. (2006). Polarizing the House of Representatives: How Much Does Gerrymandering Matter? In P. S. Nivola, & D. W. Brady (Eds.), Red and Blue Nation? Characteristics and Causes of America’s Polarized Politics (pp. 263-283). Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Masket, S. (2013). Polarization Interrupted? California’s Experiment with the Top-Two Primary. In E. Rarick (Ed.), Governing California: Politics, Government, and Public Policy in the Golden State Berkley (pp. 175-190). Berkeley, CA: Berkley Public Policy Press.
Masket, S. E., Winburn, J., & Wright, G. C. (2012). The Gerrymanderers Are Coming! Legislative Redistricting Won’t Affect Competition or Polarization Much, No Matter Who Does It. Political Science and Politics, 45, 39-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001703
McCarty, N. M., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.
McDonald, M. P. (2006). Drawing the Lines on District Competition. Political Science and Politics, 39, 91-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096506060161
Miller, P., & Grofman, B. (2013). Redistricting Commissions in the Western United States. UC Irvine Law Review, 3, 637-668.
Nivola, P. S., & Brady, D. W. (2006). Red and Blue Nation? Characteristics and Causes of America’s Polarized Politics. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Passantino, G. (2008). Redistricting in California: Competitive Elections and the Effects of Proposition 11 (Policy Brief 72). Los Angeles, CA: Reason Foundation.
Poole, K. T. (1998). Recovering a Basic Space from a Set of Issue Scales. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 954-993. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2991737
Poole, K. T. (2007). Changing Minds? Not in Congress! Public Choice, 131, 435-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9124-y
Theriault, S. M. (2008). Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790652
Winburn, J. (2011). Does It Matter If Legislatures or Commissions Draw the Lines? In G. Moncrief (Ed.), Reapportionment and Redistricting in the West (pp. 137-160). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.