This paper tries to answer the question that “To what extent did the UN policy in South West Africa represent a successful and legitimate change in attitude and action by the United Nations towards the sovereignty of individual states when compared to indigenous peoples’ right to self-determination?” This paper analyzes to what extent UN involvement in the colony of South West Africa, now known as Namibia, constituted a tangible change in UN, and therefore globally held, views on national sovereignty. Namibia itself has a long and complicated history. The United Nations’ response to the colonization of South West Africa represented a fundamental change in the traditional view of sovereignty, from old view, which held that the sovereign ruler had the right to govern his own territory; to the modern view, which generally holds that people have the sovereign right to self-determination.
Avalon Project. (2016). The Covenant of the League of Nations. Avalon.law.yale.edu. N.p., 2016. Web. 14 July 2016.
Bring, O. (2000). Westphalian Peace Tradition in International Law-From Jus ad Bellum to Jus Contra Bellum, The. International Law Studies Series. US Naval War College, 75, 57.
Cameron, E. A. (2011). The Independence of Scotland: Self-Government and the Shifting Politics of Union—By Michael Keating. Parliamentary History, 30, 286-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-0206.2011.00271_17.x
Caporaso, J. A. (2000). Continuity and Change in the Westphalian Order. International Studies Review, 2, 1-28.
Carroll, F. (2015). South West Africa and the United Nations. Lexington, US: The University Press of Kentucky.
Cooper, A. D. (2007). Reparations for the Herero Genocide: Defining the Limits of International Litigation. African Affairs, 106, 113-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adl005
Cunningham, K. G., Bakke, K. M., & Seymour, L. J. (2012). Shirts Today, Skins Tomorrow: Dual Contests and the Effects of Fragmentation in Self-Determination Disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56, 67-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002711429697
Ellers, M. N. S. (1996). The New World Order: Sovereignty, Human Rights, and the Self-Deter- mination of Peoples.
Elshtain, J. B. (1991). Sovereignty, Identity, Sacrifice. Social Research, 58, 545-564.
Evans, J. (2013). Ann Genovese, Alexander Reilly, Patrick Wolfe. Sovereignty: Frontiers of Possibility. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Freeman, C. W. (1989). The Angola/Namibia Accords. Foreign Affairs, 68, 126. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20044012
Harmsen, R., & Spiering, M. (2004). Euroscepticism and the Evolution of European Political Debate. Euroscepticism, 20, 13-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789401201087_002
Henkin, L. (1999). Kosovo and the Law of “Humanitarian Intervention”. The American Journal of International Law, 93, 824-828. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2555346
Kagan-Guthrie, Z. (2011). Cold War in Southern Africa: White Power, Black Liberation. Journal of Cold War Studies, 13, 244-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/JCWS_r_00122
Kohli, A. (1997). Can Democracies Accommodate Ethnic Nationalism? Rise and Decline of Self- Determination Movements in India. The Journal of Asian Studies, 56, 325-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2646240
Lawrence, D. A. (2000). A Shaky De Facto Kurdistan. Middle East Report, No. 215, 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1520151
Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) Notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970) (1970-71). (n.d.). The Development of Human Rights Law by the Judges of the International Court of Justice. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472563859.ch-016
Likuwa, K. M. (2013). Refining Conflict Resolution Theory—Liberating Namibia: The Long Diplomatic Struggle between the United Nations and South Africa. By E. Ike Udogu. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co., 2012. Pp. ix+253. $55, paperback (isbn978-0-7864-6576-7). The Journal of African History, 54, 296-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021853713000418
Macklem, P. (2006). Militant Democracy, Legal Pluralism, and the Paradox of Self-Determina- tion. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 4, 488-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/mol017
Mathie, W. R. (1988). The Critical Failure of Hobbes—HamptonJean: Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. pp. xii, 299. $42.50.). The Review of Politics, 50, 334-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500015795
Nyerere, J. K. (1963). A United States of Africa. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 1, 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X00000677
Reisman, W. M. (1990). Sovereignty and Human Rights in Contemporary International Law. The American Journal of International Law, 84, 866-876. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2202838
Simpson, G. J. (1996). The Diffusion of Sovereignty: Self-Determination in the Post-Colonial Age. Stanford Journal of International Law, 32, 255.
Summary of the Judgment of 18 July 1966, South West Africa (Liberia v. South Africa). The United Nations, The International Court of Justice.
The United Nations and Decolonization—Trusteeship Council. Un.org. N.p., 2016. Web. 13 July 2016.
The Universal Declaration on Human Rights, United Nations. Un.org. N.p., 2016. Web. 13 July 2016.
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2145 (XXI), Question of South West Africa.
United Nations Security Council Resolution 276, The Situation in Namibia, 30 January.
Wallerstein, I. (1975). Book Reviews: John Dugard (ed.), The South West Africa/Namibia Dispute: Documents and Scholarly Writings on the Controversy Between South Africa and the United Nations. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1973, pp. xix, 585, $ 8.95. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 10, 242-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002190967501000327