Differential Analysis of Judicial Proceedings of Crime for Legal Entities
- 1 Criminal Law, Tehran, Iran
- 2 Criminal Law, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
With an increased number of legal entities, so close competitions were between them and in order to achieve more benefits and stay ahead of competitors, each may fulfill his purpose by any means and in this way, they may not hesitate to even commit illegal and also criminal activities. Gradually, with the maturing of civil claims in relation to legal entities, their criminal responsibility has been discussed. Given that many punishments as well as judicial proceedings of crime which are applicable for individuals are not relevant to legal entities, a form of distinction in proceeding of the crimes of legal entities comes into existence. Differential of the methods of proceedings crimes of legal entities in considering principles of governance in legal entities criminal proceedings is justified by establishing the governance of utilitarian proceedings, dependency of the presumption of innocence, indictment and specialization in judgment. On the other hand, limitation of guarantees of proceedings in criminal proceedings of legal entities due to increase in the period under supervision, lawyer intervention limits in preliminary investigation and territorial expansion, preventive detention, is applicable.
- Abrndabady, N., Ali, H., & Beigy, H. M. (2000). Encyclopedia of Criminology. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press.
- Beccaria, S. (1998). Treatise of Crimes and Punishments. Translated by Mohammad Ali Ardebili, Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press.
- Clarkson, C. M. V. (1996). Analysis of the Principles of Criminal Law (2nd ed.). Translated by Hossein Mir Mohammad Sadeghi, Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press.
- Friedman, L. (2002). Deterrence. Translated by Asgar Ghahreman Pour Bonab and Talebi Arani, R., Tehran: Center for Strategic Studies Press.
- Isfahani (1950). Mohammad Taqi Ibn Abdul Rahim. Qom: Hdayh Almstrshdyn Fi Malm as al-Din al-Islami House Institute.
- Khazani, M. (2001). Presumption of Innocence and Adducing in the Criminal Cases. The Journal of Legal Studies, No. 14 and 15.
- Mahmoudi, F. (2006). Criminalization of Legal Topics in Iran and the Influence of Social and Political Considerations on It. The Journal of Religion and Communications, No. 17.
- Mohseni, F. (2012). Corporative Crime from the Perspective of Criminology. Perspectives of Criminal Justice Journal, No. 57.
- Motahari, M. (1999). Introduction to Islamic Sciences. No. 3, Bakersfield, CA: Sadra Press.
- Mozafar, M. R. (1970). Al-Fiqh Principles (Vol. 2). The House Vsshal Altabh Ljmah Almdrsyn Logwood.
- Naini, M. H. (1999). The Benefits of Principle (Vol. 3). Qom: The Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom.
- Palmer, M. (2000). Ethical Issues. Translated by Ali Reza Al-Buwayh, Qom: Ganj-e-Danesh Press.
- Reesi, L. (2005). Study of Specialized Courts for Intellectual Property Rights. Mofid Magazine, No. 64.
- Robertson, J. B. (2004). Law Commission of New Zealand. Report No, 85 Justice for All.