Is Nationalism Crucial in China-US Relations? <br/>—Evidence from a Comparative Analysis
- 1 School of Public Administration, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China
Abstract
Due to China’s assertive diplomacy in maritime space, nationalism, de-scribed as an element of a “newly assertive China”, arouses concern among Americans. With Donald Trump, who caters to both the far left and the far right, becoming the 45 th US president, China-US relations have entered a period of historic uncertainty. There has been speculation that nationalism is rising in both China and the United States, which will have a profound effect on bilateral relations. Does nationalism play an essential role in China-US relations? In order to respond to this question, this essay explains the different meanings of democracy in China and the United States, and then analyzes these two different kinds of democracy how to influence the nationalism of those two countries. This essay also clarifies the relationship between nationalism and interests. We can find that international politics is inseparable from domestic politics. China’s nationalism tends to be a political appeal from top leaders to the public, which can be guided by power. Although Chinese nationalism may play a small role in bilateral diplomatic activities, Chinese foreign policy is interest-oriented. By comparison, checks and balances are a cornerstone of the power structure in America. Even with “uncertain Trump” as the leader of America, policy making in the US will not materially change a lot. Thus, we find that interests, China’s party-state system, checks and balances in America make both sides prudent and rational, and nationalism cannot play a decisive role in China-US relations.
- Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
- Bernstein, R., & Munro, R. H. (1997). The Coming Conflict with America. Foreign Affairs, 76, 19. https://doi.org/10.2307/20047934
- Doyle, D. (2011). The Legitimacy of Political Institutions: Explaining Contemporary Populism in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, No. 44, 1447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011407469
- Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Gong, W. B., & Liang, J. Y. (2004). Anthony Smith: Nation and Nationalism in the Era of Globalization. Xue Hai, No. 1, 196.
- Gries, P. (1994). China’s New Nationalism (pp. 12, 134). Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.
- He, Y. (2007). History, Chinese Nationalism and the Emerging Sino-Japanese Conflict. Journal of Contemporary China, 16, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560601026710
- Hobsbawm, E. J. (1992). Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Program, Myth, Reality (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Johnston, A. I. (2016). Is Chinese Nationalism Rising?—Evidence from Beijing. International Security, 43, 7-43.
- Liang, X. C. (2015). Dislocation of the Subject: the Gains and Losses of Western Research of Chinese Nationalism. Diplomatic Commentary, No. 2, 29-48.
- Mirana Ardoniania, R. (2009). Nationalism and China Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War Era: A Negation of the “China Threat”. Master Thesis, Jilin: Jilin University.
- O’Brien, C. C. (1993). The Wrath of Ages: Nationalism’s Primordial Roots. Foreign Affairs, 72, 148. https://doi.org/10.2307/20045820
- Rothwell, J. (2016). Explaining Nationalist Political Views: The Case of Donald Trump. Social Science Electronic Publishing.
- Wu, X. B. (2017). Prospects of China-US Relations in the Trump Administration. International Studies, No. 2, 15.
- Yan, W. J. (2008). Research on Paradigms of Contemporary Western Nationalism. Nation Research, No. 4, 99-107.
- Yan, X. T. (2017). The Caution of ‘Black Swan Events’ for International Theories (Editor’s Note). International Politics Science, 2, II-IV.
- Yuan, Z. (2016). Must Meet the Challenge: The Influence of Trump’s Election on Sino-American Relations. China Investment, No. 23, 32-35.