On the Ontology of Structural Realism
- 1 California State University, Fullerton, California, USA
Abstract
Due to its systemic approach, structural realism (or neorealism) can be subsumed under methodological holism, which takes social phenomena to be wholes that cannot be reduced to their parts. The wholes posited by structural realism are the state and the international structure. Recent developments in the philosophy of social science suggest that methodological holism ought to be limited to causal explanation and complemented by ontological individualism, which requires an account of how social wholes derive from individuals. Structural realism lacks such an account because it takes the state as an empirical given, mistaking for a fact what is really a concept in need of deductive derivation from individuals. To bring the theory methodologically up to date, this essay undertakes such a derivation of the state from individuals, proceeding in the deductive manner of political theory. It thus provides structural realism with a methodologically valid ontology, which, in turn, enables the theory to better defend itself against liberal and constructivist critics who reduce the state to a transient phenomenon.
- Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment. London: Hogarth.
- Carneiro, R. L. (1970). A Theory of the Origin of the State. Science, 169, 733-738. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.169.3947.733
- Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (2008). Handbook of Attachment: Theory Research, and Clinical Applications. New York: Guilford Press.
- Fischer, M. (1995). Machiavelli’s Theory of Foreign Politics. Security Studies, 5, 248-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419508429268
- Freyberg-Inan, A. (2004). What Moves Man: The Realist Theory of International Relations and Its Judgment of Human Nature. New York: State University of New York Press.
- Freyberg-Inan, A. (2006). Rational Paranoia and Enlightened Machismo: The Strange Psychological Foundations of Realism. Journal of International Relations and Development, 9, 247-268. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800093
- Hamilton, W. D. (1996). Narrow Roads of Gene Land. Oxford: W.H. Freeman.
- Hayek, F. A. (1979). Scientism and the Study of Society. In The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuses of Reason (pp. 17-182). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press.
- Hobbes, T. (1978). Man and Citizen. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
- Hobbes, T. (1994). Leviathan. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
- Kavka, G. S. (1983). Rule by Fear. Nous, 17, 601-620. https://doi.org/10.2307/2215084
- List, C., & Spiekermann, K. (2013). Methodological Individualism and Holism in Political Science: A Reconciliation. American Political Science Review, 107, 629-643. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000373
- Machiavelli, N. (1985). The Prince (H. C. Mansfield Jr., Transl.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Machiavelli, N. (1996). Discourses on Livy (Trans., Mansfield, H.C. and Tarcov, N.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226500331.001.0001
- Morgenthau, H. J. (1946). Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Oppenheimer, F. (1926). The State. New York: Vanguard.
- Palmer, L. F. (2002). The Chemistry of Attachment. API News, 5, 2.
- Popper, K. (1957). The Poverty of Historicism. London: Ark Paperbacks.