Testing Structural Explanations for U.S. Military Intervention: Do Support for the President and Conservatives in Congress Embolden the President? — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Testing Structural Explanations for U.S. Military Intervention: Do Support for the President and Conservatives in Congress Embolden the President?
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
,
Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA
1 Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
In this research, we use insights drawn from Institutional Theory to explore and test the ability of Congress to check presidential foreign policy decision-making. Specifically, we test structural explanations, which tap aggregate presidential support in Congress and legislator ideology. Our concern is whether these institutional dynamics associate with a president’s decision to conduct military operations. We analyze relationships in each chamber of Congress, independently, to test whether support or ideology is more or less significant in one chamber versus the other. We find, in the time period 1954 to 2013, a statistically and substantively important relationship between both presidential support in Congress and aggregate legislator ideology and the use of force decision. Moreover, this is the case in both chambers. In the testing , we control for the partisanship of the president, the political party which holds a majority of seats in each chamber, and a host of other considerations scholars argue will influence the likelihood of a show of force.
KeywordsForeign Policy CrisisChecks and BalancesUS Foreign PolicyWar Powers
Bartolomew, D. J., Steele, F., Moustaki, I., & Galbraith, J. I. (2008). Analysis of Multivariate Social Science Data (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Berinsky, A. J. (2007). Assuming the Costs of War: Events, Elites, and American Public Support for Military Conflict. Journal of Politics, 69, 975-997. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00602.x
Brands, H. W. (1987). Decisions on American Armed Intervention: Lebanon, Dominican Republic, and Grenada. Political Science Quarterly, 102, 607-624. https://doi.org/10.2307/2151304
Brecher, M. (2008). International Political Earthquakes. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.293883
Brecher, M., & Wilkenfeld, J. (2000). A Study of Crisis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Brody, R. A. (1991). Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (2013). Overview of BLS Statistics on Inflation and Prices. https://www.bls.gov
Busby, J. W., & Monten, J. (2012). Republican Elites and Foreign Policy Attitudes. Political Science Quarterly, 127, 105-142. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2012.tb00722.x
Butler, M. J. (2003). U.S. Military Intervention in Crisis, 1945-1994: An Empirical Inquiry of Just War Theory. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47, 226-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002702251031
Canes-Wrone, B., Howell, W. G., & Lewis, D. E. (2008). Toward a Broader Understanding of Presidential Power: A Reevaluation of the Two Presidencies Thesis. Journal of Politics, 70, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381607080061
Carey, H. F. (2001). U.S. Domestic Politics and the Emerging Humanitarian Intervention Policy: Haiti, Bosnia, and Kosovo. World Affairs, 164, 72-82.
Choi, S. W. (2013). What Determines US Humanitarian Intervention? Conflict Management and Peace Science, 30, 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894212473916
Christenson, D. P., & Kriner, D. L. (2017). Mobilizing the Public against the President: Congress and the Political Costs of Unilateral Action. American Journal of Political Science, 61, 769-785. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12298
Cohen, J. E. (1991). Historical Reassessment of Wildavsky’s “Two Presidencies” Thesis. Social Science Quarterly, 63, 549-555.
Cooper, P. J. (2014). By Order of the President: The Use and Abuse of Executive Direct Action (2nd ed.). Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Copeland, D. C. (2000). The Origins of Major War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Deering, C. J., & Maltzman, F. (1999). The Politics of Executive Orders: Legislative Constraints on Presidential Power. Political Research Quarterly, 52, 767-783. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299905200405
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52, 887-917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
Fisher, L. (2004). Presidential War Power (2nd ed.). Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Fleisher, R., Bond J. R., Krutz G. S., & Hanna S. (2000). The Demise of the Two Presidencies. American Politics Research, 28, 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X00028001001
Fordham, B. (1998). Partisanship, Macroeconomic Policy, and U.S. Uses of Force, 1949-1994. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42, 418-439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002798042004002
Gerring, J., Ziblatt, D., Van Gorp, J., & Arévalo, J. (2011). An Institutional Theory of Direct and Indirect Rules. World Politics, 63, 377-433. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887111000104
Gries, P. H. (2014). The Politics of American Foreign Policy: How Ideology Divides Liberals and Conservatives over Foreign Affairs. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hermann, C. F. (Ed.) (1972). International Crises: Insights from Behavioral Research. New York: Free Press.
Hermann, M. G., & Kegley, C. W. (1998). The U.S. Use of Military Intervention to Promote Democracy: Evaluating the Record. International Interactions, 24, 91-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629808434922
Holsti, O. R., & Rosenau, J. N. (1996). Liberal, Populists, Liberatarians, and Conservatives: The Link between Domestic and International Affairs. International Political Science Review, 17, 29-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251296017001003
Howell, W. G., & Lewis, D. E. (2002). Agencies by Presidential Design. Journal of Politics, 64, 1095-1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00164
Howell, W. G., & Pevehouse, J. C. (2005). Presidents, Congress, and the Use of Force. International Organization, 59, 209-232. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050034
Howell, W. G., & Pevehouse, J. C. (2007a). While Dangers Gather: Congressional Checks on Presidential War Powers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Howell, W. G., & Pevehouse, J. C. (2007b). When Congress Stops Wars: Partisan Politics and Presidential Power. Foreign Affairs, 86, 95-107.
Huth, P. K. (1998). Major Power Intervention in International Crises, 1918-1988. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42, 744-770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002798042006004
Ingberman, D., & Villani, J. (1993). An Institutional Theory of Divided Government and Party Polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 429-471. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111380
Irons, P. (2005). War Powers: How the Imperial Presidency Hijacked the Constitution. New York: Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt.
James, P., & Oneal, J. R. (1991). The Influence of Domestic and International Politics on the President’s Use of Force. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 307-332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002791035002008
Kartzmann, R. (1990). A Question of Balance: The President, the Congress, and Foreign Policy. In T. Mann (Ed.), A Question of Balance: The President, the Congress, and Foreign Policy. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
Koh, H. H. (1991). The National Security Constitution: Sharing Power after the Iran-Contra Affair. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Krause, G. A., & Cohen, D. B. (1997). Presidential Use of Executive Orders, 1953-1994. American Politics Research, 25, 458-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9702500403
Krause, G. A., & Cohen, J. E. (2000). Opportunity, Constraints, and the Development of the Institutional Presidency: The Issuance of Executive Orders, 1939-96. Journal of Politics, 62, 88-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00005
Krehbiel, K. (1998). Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226452739.001.0001
Kriner, D. L. (2006). Taming the Imperial Presidency: Congress, Presidents, and the Conduct of Military Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kriner, D. L. (2010). After the Rubicon: Congress, Presidents, and the Politics of Waging War. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226453583.001.0001
Lebow, R. N. (1981). Between Peace and War: The Nature of International Crisis. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Lektzian, D., & Souva, M. (2007). An Institutional Theory of Sanctions Onset and Success. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51, 848-871. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002707306811
Lian, B., & Oneal, J. R. (1993). Presidents, the Use of Military Force, and Public Opinion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37, 277-300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002793037002003
Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1990). An Institutional Approach to the Theory of Policy-Making: The Role of Guidance Mechanism in Policy Formulation. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2, 59-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692890002001003
Lindsay, J. M. (1994). Congress, Foreign Policy, and the New Institutionalism. International Studies Quarterly, 38, 281-304. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600978
Lindsay, J. M., & Ripley, R. B. (1993). How Congress Influences Foreign and Defense Policy. In R. B. Ripley, & J. M. Lindsay (Eds.), Congress Resurgent: Foreign and Defense Policy on Capitol Hill (pp. 7-32). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Makinda, S. M. (2008). The African Union: Challenges of Globalization, Security, and Governance. New York: Routledge Press.
Marshall, B. W., & Pacelle, R. L. (2005). Revisiting the Two Presidencies. American Politics Research, 33, 81-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X04266816
Mastanduno, M. (1997). Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy after the Cold War. International Security, 21, 49-88. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.21.4.49
Mayer, K. R. (1999). Executive Orders and Presidential Power. The Journal of Politics, 61, 445-466. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647511
Mayer, K. R. (2002). With the Stroke of a Pen: Executive Orders and Presidential Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
McCormick, J. M., & Wittkopf, E. R. (1990). Bipartisanship, Partisanship, and Ideology in Congressional-Executive Foreign Policy Relations, 1947-1988. The Journal of Politics, 52, 1077-1100. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131683
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Meernik, J. (1994). Presidential Decision Making and the Political Use of Military Force. International Studies Quarterly, 38, 121-138. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600874
Meernik, J. (2000). Modeling International Crises and the Political Use of military Force by the USA. Journal of Peace Research, 37, 547-562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343300037005001
Milner, H. V., & Tingley, D. H. (2015). Sailing at the Water’s Edge: The Domestic Politics of American Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873821
Moe, T. M., & Howell, W. G. (1999a). The Presidential Power of Unilateral Action. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15, 132-179.
Moe, T. M., & Howell, W. G. (1999b). Unilateral Action and Presidential Power: A Theory. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 29, 850-872.
Mueller, J. E. (1973). War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Narizny, K. (2001). The Political Economy of Grand Strategy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Ornstein, N. J., Mann, T. E., Malbin, M.J., Rugg, A., & Wakeman, R. (2017). Vital Statistics on Congress. Washington DC. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Vital-Statistics-Full-Data-Set.pdf
Ostrom, C. W., & Job, B. L. (1986). The President and the Political Use of Force. The American Political Science Review, 80, 541-566. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958273
Palmer, G., D’Orazio, V., Kenwick, M., & Lane, M. (2015). The MID4 Data Set: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 32, 222-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894214559680
Peceny, M. (1995). Two Paths to the Promotion of Democracy during U.S. Military Interventions. International Studies Quarterly, 39, 371-401. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600926
Peters, G., & Woolley, J. T. (2018). The American Presidency Project. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California Santa Barbara. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/
Powell, G. B. (1982). Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability, and Violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Prins, B. C. (1999). The Politics of Conflict Resolution: Evaluating the Determinants of American Third-Party Intervention, 1918-1994. Doctoral Dissertation, East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
Rathbun, B. C. (2008). Does One Right Make a Realist? Conservatism, Neoconservatism, and Isolationism in the Foreign Policy Ideology of American Elites. Political Science Quarterly, 123, 271-299. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2008.tb00625.x
Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2008). The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust. Comparative Politics, 40, 441-459. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041508X12911362383354
Ruggie, J. G. (1998). What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization, 52, 855-885. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550770
Schraufnagel, S., & Shellman, S. M. (2001). The Two Presidencies, 1984-98: A Replication and Extension. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 31, 699-707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0000-0000.2001.00194.x
Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching Adulthood: The Maturing of Institutional Theory. Theory and Society, 37, 427-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9067-z
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
Sigelman, L. (1979). A Reassessment of the Two Presidencies Thesis. The Journal of Politics, 41, 1195-1205. https://doi.org/10.2307/2129741
Small, M., & Singer, D. (1990). National Material Capabilities Dataset. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Stimson, J. A. (1999). Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. S. (2015). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). New York: Pearson Longman.
Tannenwald, N. (1999). The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use. International Organization, 53, 433-468. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550959
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House.
Weissman, S. R. (2017). Congress and War: How the House and the Senate Can Reclaim Their Role. Foreign Affairs, 96, 132-145.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46, 391-425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764
Wiarda, H. J. (2009). Divided America on the World Stage: Broken Government and Foreign Policy. Washington DC: Potomac Books, Inc.
Wildavsky, A. (1966). The Two Presidencies. Trans-Action, 4, 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02810961
Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (5th ed.). Boston, MA: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Zaller, J. R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818691