The Impact of Political Reforms in Improving Quality Health Services: The Case Study of Shamva District
- 1 Department of Development Studies, Zimbabwe Open University, Harare, Zimbabwe
Abstract
Zimbabweans continue to experience challenges in combating communicable diseases such as tuberculosis, diarrheal diseases, and HIV/AIDS. The country’s health sector decentralisation implementation is moving at a snail’s speed, triggering complaints of unsatisfactory service delivery at rural health centres. The study examined the impact of political reforms in improving quality health services in Shamva District. The identified political reforms were decentralisation and the second republic that emerged in November 2018 that embraced the 100-day plans approach, civil service reform agenda, development of transitional stabilisation plan and vision 2030 agenda. The study was guided by interpretive and critical post-modernist paradigms. Qualitative methodology was utilised ; key informant interviews, focus group discussion and desk reviews were data generation tools that were utilised. The data generated were analysed using grounded theory. The key findings are that decentralisation enabled district health officials to interact with communities through social accountability strategies such as community scorecard, results-based financing and village health worker model that is implemented in Shamva District by Civil Society Organisations. The second republic political reforms enforced the user fee policy in the health sector and focused on improving primary health care. The political reforms led to improved health rights knowledge of communities and quality health services in Shamva District. The study concluded that lack of continuous funding and sustainable plans led to the reversal of positive results that were brought in by the political reforms. The major recommendation is that government should understand that service delivery is not poor by accident ; rather it is a symptom of the underlying institutional environment and political economy analysis should be done to address the real blockages in health sector.
- Ackerman, J. M. (2005). Human Rights and Social Accountability. Social Development Papers No. 86, Washington DC: The World Bank.
- Arnstein, S. R. (2011). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35, 216-224.
- Bold, T., Molina, E., & Safir, A. (2017). Clientelism in the Public Sector: Why Public Service Reforms May Not Succeed and What to Do about It. World Development Report 2017 Governance and the Law. https://doi.org/10.1596/26257
- Chakaipa, S. (2001). The Zimbabwean Experience. In D. Conyers (Ed.), African Regional Conference on the challenge of Decentralisation and Local Government. Cape Town: United Nations Capital Development Funds.
- Conyers, D. (2003). Decentralisation in Zimbabwe: A Local Perspective. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.265
- Cozby, P. C. (2009). Methods in Behavioural Research (10th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
- De Haan, A., & Everest-Phillips, M. (2007). Can New Aid Modalities Handle Politics (Vol. 63)? WIDER Research Paper, Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.
- DFID (2005). Lessons Learned-Planning and Undertaking a Drivers of Change Study. How to Note, A DFID Practice Paper, London: DFID.
- Ellis, J. (2014). Writing Better Questionnaires: Getting Better Data. Charities Evaluation Services.
- European Commission (2008). Analysing and Addressing Governance in Sector Operations. Tools and Methods Series, Reference Document No. 4.
- Gill, K., Stewart, E., Treasure, B., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of Data Collection in Qualitative Research: Interviews and Focus Groups. British Dental Journal, 204, 291-295. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192
- Kaseke, E. (1998). The State and Dynamics of Social Policy Practice and Research in Zimbabwe. Journal of Social Development in Africa, 13, 21-34.
- Makumbe, J. (1998). Development and Democracy in Zimbabwe: Constraints of Decentralization. Zimbabwe: Sapes Trust.
- Ministry of Health and Child Care (2017). Zimbabwe Health Financing Policy.
- Molynuex, S., Mulupi, S., Mbabu, L., & Marsh, V. (2012). Benefits and Payment for Research Participants: Experiences and Views from a Research Centre on the Kenyan Coast. Kenya: BMC Medical Ethics Bio Med Central Ltd.
- Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social Research Methods—Qualitative and Quantitative White Water. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.