The Techniques for Appeasing the Tension between the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the African Union (AU)
- 1 Department of Law, Central South University, Changsha, China
- 2 Department of Law, Central South University, Changsha, China
Abstract
The issue of cooperation between the International Criminal Court and the African continent is nowadays widely discussed. The fact that the African Union has fiercely opposed the authority of the ICC, by non-cooperation and by threatening collective withdrawal in order to create a purely African Court, this article report some techniques for appeasing the tension between these two organizations, so that the repression of international crimes can exist on the African continent. It is not only a question of presenting the efforts already made by the ICC to reduce the problem with the African Union, but also of talking about the accompanying measures of the African Union to these members to judge the person responsible for the international crimes in Africa in order to avoid the application of the principle of complementarity of the Court.
- African Union (2009). Decision on the Report of the Meeting of African States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Assembly/AU/Dec, 245 (XIII) Rev.1, § 10. https://au.int/sites/default/files/decisions/9560-assembly_en_1_3_july_2009_auc_thirteenth_ordinary_session_decisions_declarations_ message_congratulations_motion_0.pdf
- Aljazeera News Africa (2016). ICC Debate: Africa vs Infamous Caucasian Court? 29 October 2016. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/10/icc-debate-africa-infamous-caucasian-court-161028142708060.html
- BBC News Africa (2013). Will Africa Pull Out of the ICC? https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-24452288
- Bosco, D. (2013). Why the International Criminal Court picking only Africa? https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-is-the-international-criminal-court-picking- only-on-africa/2013/03/29/cb9bf5da-96f7-11e2-97cd-3d8c1afe4f0f_story.html
- Burundi (2006). Act No. 1/32 of 22 November 2006 on Temporary Immunity from Judicial Proceedings in Favor of Members of the Movement Signatory to the Cease-Fire Agreement, 7 September 2006.
- Cannon, B. J., Pkalya, D. R., & Maragia, B. (2017). The International Criminal Court and Africa: Contextualizing the Anti-ICC Narrative. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320407768_The_International_Criminal_Court_ and_Africa_Contextualizing_the_Anti-ICC_Narrative
- FIDH (2016). Termination of Ruto and Sang Case at the ICC: Witness Tampering Means Impunity Prevails over Justice Again. https://www.fidh.org/en/region/Africa/kenya/termination-of-ruto-and-sang-case-at-the-icc- witness-tampering-means
- Goodman, R., & Mncwabe, N. (2011). International Criminal Justice in Africa: Neocolonial Agenda or Strengthened Accountability (19 p.)? African Transitional Justice Research Network. https://au.int/sites/default/files/documents/30188-doc-atjrn_brief_oct_2011_-_ international_criminal_justice_in_africa_0.pdf
- Human Rights Watch (2004). The International Criminal Court: How Nongovernmental Organizations Can Contribute to the Prosecution of War Criminals. https://www.hrw.org/legacy/backgrounder/africa/icc0904/icc0904.pdf
- Human Rights Watch (2016). Africa Speaks Out against ICC Withdrawal. http://www.hrw.org/Africa/Botswana
- ICC, Situations and Cases. https://www.icc-cpi.int/cases
- Klamberg, M. (2017). Commentary on the Law of the International Criminal Court (819 p.). Brussels: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher. https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/aa0e2b/pdf