Women in Development: A Critique of Neo-Classical Economic Theory as One of the Causes for Gender Inequality
- 1 Department of International Development, School of Agriculture Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, UK
Abstract
This research reviews and critiques neoliberalism and neoclassical economics for them being one of the main causes for the subordination and oppression of women. This research does not claim that neoliberalism is the axis of evil ; however it discusses how alternative economic and political theories can be more useful and efficient for women and gender development. The research question is mainly concerned with how far do neoclassical economic theories perpetuate and intensify power struggle between genders? The research argues for neoclassical economic theory being a main driving force in the subordination and oppression of women, especially in global South countries that have been subjugated to structural adjustment. In order to do so, this research utilizes an intersectional feminist framework of analysis to methodologically deconstruct neoclassical economic theory and critically investigate their gendered effects on beneficiary countries. Moreover, the political conceptual framework of “inside-outside”, pioneered by Robert Cox, is the analytical tool used throughout this research. The research will, therefore, first clarify the difference between gender and sex, and clarify what I mean when I say “ neoclassical economic theory ” . Followed by a criticism of how neoclassical economics is a theory of discrimination. An argument for the non-existence of a separation between the global level and the social level when analyzing gender relations will be the primary objective of this study. Lastly, the research discusses how structural adjustment programs affect women, specifically women living in poverty and armed conflict.
- Ball, J. A. (2004). The Effects of Neoliberal Structural Adjustment on Women’s Relative Employment in Latin America. International Journal of Social Economics, 31, 974-987. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290410555426
- Bowls, S., & Ginits, H. (2003). The Problem with Human Capital Theory—A Marxist Critique. The American Economic Review, 65, 74-82.
- Bradshaw, S., Castellino, J., & Diop, B. (2012). Women’s Role in Economic Development: Overcoming the Constraints. In Challenges of Social Inclusion: Gender, Inequalities and Human Rights (pp. 1-15). New York: Middlesex University Press.
- Bretton Woods Projects (2005). What Are the Bretton Woods Institutions. BrettonWoodsProject.org. http://www.brettonwoodsproject.org/2005/08/art-320747/
- Bricker, N. Q., & Foley, M. C. (2013). The Effect of Youth Demographics on Violence: The Importance of the Labor Market. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 8, 1-15.
- Buvinic, M. (1997). Women in Poverty: A New Global Underclass. Foreign Policy, No. 108, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149088
- Cincotta, R., Engelman, R., & Anastasion, D. (2003). The Security Demographic: Population and Civil Conflict after the Cold War. Population Action International, 12.
- Easterly, W. (2000) The Effect of IMF and World Bank Programs on Poverty. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/staffp/2000/00-00/e.pdf https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.256883
- Esplen, E., & Yolly, S. (2006). Gender and SEX. In Gender and Development (pp. 1-13). Sussex, United Kingdom: University of Sussex, BRIDGE.
- Gallo, C. (2002). Economic Growth and Income Inequality: Theoretical Background and Empirical Evidence. The American Economic Review, 45, 1-28.
- Gowen, C. D. (2007). Armed Civil Conflict, Forms of Conditionality, and Economic Grievances. In IMF Conditionality and Armed Civil Conflict: An Analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 25-31). Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.
- Gultung, J. (1993). Kulturelle Gewalt. Der Bürger im Staat, 43, 106.
- International Rescue Committee (2014). The Forgotten Frontline: The Effects of War on Women. http://www.rescue.org/forgotten-frontline-effects-war-women
- Ke, Y. Y. (2014). Structural Adjustment Programs and Armed Civil Conflict: Introduction and Existing Theoretical Approaches. In The Medicine of War: IMF Structural Adjustment, Ethnic Politics, and Armed Civil Conflict (pp. 8-26). Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky.