CETA, an Innovative Agreement with Many Unsettled Trajectories
- 1 Center for Research on Integration and Globalisation, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- 2 Center for Research on Integration and Globalisation, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- 3 Center for Research on Integration and Globalisation, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada
Abstract
Can trade agreements integrate innovations and progressive dispositions? In this era of fast changes linked to globalization and technological changes which fuel discontent, this question has emerged in the literature and in the negotiation processes of many recent agreements. In the first section of this article, we will introduce the structural changes that are beneath the surface of recent trade agreements using a typology of trade agreements enabling comparative analysis. In the second section, we will discuss some of the most important innovations of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) negotiated by Canada and the European Union. In the third section, we will see that part of the innovative nature of CETA, its evolutionary nature, brings many unsettled trajectories. In the fourth section, we will discuss how CETA is further unsettled in its trajectory because it puts into relation two distinctive integration models highlighted in our typology, one developed in Europe and the other in North America and, furthermore, because of the more general context that also puts into play Asia and China as emerging shapers of economic trade agreements.
- Arès, M., Boulanger, é., & Deblock, C. (2016). Intégration ou interconnexion? Revue Interventions économiques, 55, 1-38. http://interventionseconomiques.revues.org/2895
- Breault, Y., & Rioux, M. (2019). The Globalization/Deglobalization Dialectic: A Fragmented World Order on the Road to Globalization 2.0? In J. L. Black, M. Johns, & A. D. Thériault (Eds.), The New world Disorder: Challenges and Threats in an Uncertain World (Chapter 10, pp. 207-228). London: Lexington Books.
- Clarkson, S. (2000). Apples and Oranges: Prospects for the Comparative Analysis of the EU and NAFTA as Continental Systems. European University Institute, RSC Working Paper 2000/23.
- Clarkson, S. (2002). Uncle Sam and Us: Globalization, Neoconservatism, and the Canadian State. Toronto: Woodrow Wilson Center Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442689541
- De Bardeleben, J., & Leblond, P. (2011). The Other Transatlantic Relationship: Canada, the EU, and 21st-Century Challenges. International Journal, 66, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/002070201106600101
- Deblock, C. (2016). From Regionalism to Cross-Regionalism (pp. 8-9). Great Insights.
- Deblock, C., & Lebullenger, J. (2018). Génération TAFTA: Les nouveaux partenariats de la mondialisation. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.
- Deblock, C., & Wells, G. P. (2017). Coopération réglementaire et accords de commerce. études Internationales, 48, 319-345. https://doi.org/10.7202/1044623ar
- Deblock, C., Paquin, S., & Lebullenger, J. (2015). Un nouveau pont sur l’Atlantique. L’accord économique et commercial global entre l’Union européenne et le Canada. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1f1hd25
- Hiault, R. (2015). Pascal Lamy: Le Traité transatlantique est un accord de troisième generation. Les échos.
- Magnette, P. (2017). CETA-Quand l’Europe déraille. Bruxelles: Luc Pire.
- Rioux, M., Ares, M., & Huang, P. (2015). Beyond NAFTA with Three Countries: The Impact of Global Value Chains on an Outdated Trade Agreement. Open Journal of Political Science, 5, 264-276. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2015.54028
- Rioux, M., Deblock, C., & Viau, L (2015). L’Aléna conjugué au passé, au présent et au futur. Québec: PUQ. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1f1hd46
- Stiglitz, J. (2019). People, Power and Profits, Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent (366 p.). New York: Norton Company.