The Promise of Democracy: The Performative Social Contract, Pluralism, and Equality
- 1 The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
Abstract
In this paper, I will use methods associated primarily with applied ethics and economic theory to provide a philosophical demonstration, within the social contract tradition, of the importance for a democracy of the substantive equality of its citizens. The social contract is a familiar modality of contemporary democratic theorising in political philosophy. An unfamiliar but promising way of thinking about the social contract is via analogy with some features, and in particular, the extended temporality and, indeed, performativity, of “real-world” contracting. Real-world contractors agree to create the conditions, over a temporally-extended period, in which the terms of their agreement are materially realised . The question of their contract’s ethical standing is not an ex ante one-off, but is considered, rather, against a sequence of ex post milestones. Ideally, as this sequence unfolds, the contractors (and others) will (performatively) summon into being the very conditions that embody the terms of the contract, thus progressively authorising it ex post facto . This approach draws on ideas, in jurisprudence, about relational contracts, and, in economics, about incomplete contracts. An approach of this general kind is well adapted to the circumstances of diversity in which all contemporary political theorising is placed and, arguably, gives a rationale for something like the modern social-democratic welfare state.
- Ackerman, B. (1993). We the People, Volume 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
- Akerlof, G. A., & Dickens, W. T. (1982). The Economic Consequences of Cognitive Dissonance. American Economic Review, 72, 307-319.
- D’Agostino, F. (1982). Mill, Paternalism and Psychiatry. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 60, 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048408212340721
- D’Agostino, F. (1996). Free Public Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
- D’Agostino, F. (2004a). The Legacies of John Rawls. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 1, 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/174046810400100308
- D’Agostino, F. (2004b). Pluralism and Liberalism. In G. Gaus, & C. Kukathas (Eds.), Handbook of Political Theory (pp. 239-249). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608139.n18
- D’Agostino, F. (2005). Legitimacy in a Pluralist Context. In G. Young, & G. Maddox (Eds.), Legitimation and the State (pp. 15-29). Armidale: Kardooair Press.
- D’Agostino, F. (2008). Original Position. In E. Zalta, & E. Hammer (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/original-position
- Derrida, J. (1989-1990). Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority. Cardozo Law Review, 11, 920-1029.
- Elster, J. (1983). See Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171694
- Faden, R., & Beauchamp, T. L. (1986). A History and Theory of Informed Consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Gaus, G. F. (2016). The Tyranny of the Ideal. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
- Hurwicz, L. (1972). On Informationally Decentralized Systems. In R. Radner, & C. B. McGuire (Eds.), Decision and Organization: A Volume in Honor of Jacob Marschak (pp. 297-336). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
- King, D., & Waldron, J. (1988). Citizenship, Social Citizenship and the Defence of Welfare Provision. British Journal of Political Science, 18, 415-443. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400005202