Computational Identification of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Model with Simplimax Procedures
- 1 Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
- 2 Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- 3 Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
Abstract
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) refers to the FA procedure with some loadings constrained to be zeros. A difficulty in CFA is that the constraint must be specified by users in a subjective manner. For dealing with this difficulty, we propose a computational method, in which the best CFA solution is obtained optimally without relying on users’ judgements. The method consists of the procedures at lower (L) and higher (H) levels: at the L level, for a fixed number of zero loadings, it is determined both which loadings are to be zeros and what values are to be given to the remaining nonzero parameters; at the H level, the procedure at the L level is performed over the different numbers of zero loadings, to provide the best solution. In the L level procedure, Kiers’ (1994) simplimax rotation fulfills a key role: the CFA solution under the constraint computationally specified by that rotation is used for initializing the parameters of a new FA procedure called simplimax FA. The task at the H level can be easily performed using information criteria. The usefulness of the proposed method is demonstrated numerically.
- Adachi, K. (2019) Factor Analysis: Latent Variable, Matrix Decomposition, and Constrained Uniqueness Formulations. WIREs Computational Statistics, 11, e1458. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wics.1458 https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1458
- Mulaik, S.A. (2010) Foundations of Factor Analysis. 2nd Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
- Yanai, H. and Ichikawa, M. (2007) Factor Analysis. In: Rao, C.R. and Sinharay, S., Eds., Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 26, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 257-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7161(06)26009-7
- Arbuckle, J.L. (2008) AMOS 17 User’s Guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago.
- Bollen, K.A. (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley, New York. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118619179
- Jöreskog, K.G. (1969) A General Approach to Confirmatory Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 183-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118619179
- Lawley, D.N. (1941) Further Investigation of Factor Estimation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh A, 61, 176-185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080454100006178
- Rubin, D.B. and Thayer, D.T. (1982) EM Algorithms for ML Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 47, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293851
- Adachi, K. (2013) Factor Analysis with EM Algorithm Never Gives Improper Solutions When Sampleand Initial Parameter Matrices Are Proper. Psychometrika, 78, 380-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-012-9299-8
- Konishi, S. and Kitagawa, G. (2008) Information Criteria and Statistical Modeling. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71887-3
- Kiers, H.A.L. (1994) Simplimax: Oblique Rotation to an Optimal Target with Simple Structure. Psychometrika, 59, 567-579. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294392
- Browne, M.W. (1972) Oblique Rotation to a Partially Specified Target. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 207-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294392
- Kiers, H.A.L. (1990) Majorization as a Tool for Optimizing a Class of Matrix Functions. Psychometrika, 55, 417-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294758
- Kiers, H.A.L. (2002) Setting Up Alternating Least Squares and Iterative Majorization Algorithms for Solving Various Matrix Optimization Problems. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 41, 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00142-1