Most meta-analysis has concentrated on combining of treatment effect measures based on comparisons of two treatments. Meta-analysis of multi-arm trials is a key component of submission to summarize evidence from all possible studies. In this paper, an exact binomial model is proposed by using logistic regression model to compare different treatment in multi-arm trials. Two approaches such as unconditional maximum likelihood and conditional maximum likelihood have been determined and compared for the logistic regression model. The proposed models are performed using the data from 27 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) which determine the efficacy of antiplatelet therapy in reduction venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
Hill, S.A.B. (1990) Memories of the British Streptomycin Trial in Tuberculosis: The First Randomized Clinical Trial. Controlled Clinical Trials, 11, 77-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(90)90001-I
Antiplatelet Trialists’ Collaboration (1994) Collaborative Overview of Randomised Trials of Antiplatelet Therapy—III: Reduction in Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism by Antiplatelet Prophylaxis among Surgical and Medical Patients. British Medical Journal, 308, 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6923.235
Chootrakool, H. and Shi, J.Q. (2008) Meta-Analysis of Multi-Arm Trials Using Empirical Logistic Transform. The Open Medical Informatics Journal, 2, 112-116. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874431100802010112
Chootrakool, H., Shi, J.Q. and Yue, R. (2011) Meta-Analysis and Sensitivity Analysis for Multi-Arm Trials with Selection Bias. Statistics in Medicine, 30, 1183-1198. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4143
Rücker, G. (2017) Methods for Including Information from Multi-Arm Trials in Pairwise Meta-Analysis Multi-Arm Trials in Pairwise Meta-Analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 8, 392-403. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1259
Lu, G. and Ades, A.E. (2004) Combination of Direct and Indirect Evidence in Mixed Treatment Comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 23, 3105-3124. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1875
Lee, A.W. (2014) Review of Mixed Treatment Comparisons in Published Systematic Reviews Shows Marked Increase since 2009. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67, 138-143.
Salanti, G. (2012) Indirect and Mixed-Treatment Comparison, Network, or Multiple-Treatments Meta-Analysis: Many Names, Many Benefits, Many Concerns for the Next Generation Evidence Synthesis Tool. Research Synthesis Methods, 3, 80-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1037
Lumley, T. (2002) Network Meta-Analysis for Indirect Treatment Comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 2313-2324. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1201
Mbuagbaw, L., et al. (2017) Approaches to Interpreting and Choosing the Best Treatments in Network Meta-Analyses. Systematic Reviews, 6, Article No. 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0473-z
Veroniki, A.A., et al. (2018) Is Providing Uncertainty Intervals in Treatment Ranking Helpful in a Network Meta-Analysis? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 100, 122-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.02.009
Seide, S.E., Jensen, K. and Kieser, M. (2019) Simulation and Data-Generation for Random-Effects Network Meta-Analysis of Binary Outcome. Statistics in Medicine, 38, 3288-3303. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8193
Jenkins, D.A., et al. (2021) Methods for the Inclusion of Real-World Evidence in Network Meta-Analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21, Article No. 207. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01399-3
Zhao, Y.P., et al. (2021) A Network Meta-Analysis for Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments for Resectable Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Esophagus. Scientific Reports, 11, Article No. 6800. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86102-8
Cox, D.R. and Snell, E.J. (1989) Analysis of Binary Data. 2nd Edition, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
Tritchler, D. (1984) An Algorithm for Exact Logistic Regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 709-711. https://doi.org/10.2307/2288420
Sartori, N. (2003) Modified Profile Likelihoods in Models with Stratum Nuisance Parameters. Biometrika, 90, 533-549. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30042064 https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/90.3.533
Lee, W.J., Shi, J.Q. and Lee, Y.J. (2010) Approximate Conditional Inference in Mixed-Effects Models with Binary Data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 54, 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.07.027
Di Caterina, C., Cortese, G. and Sartori, N. (2018) Monte Carlo Modified Profile Likelihood for Panel Data Models. arXiv:1801.02597v1.
Lu, G.B. and Ades, A.E. (2006) Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 447-459. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214505000001302
Weber, F., et al. (2020) Zero-Cell Corrections in Random-Effects Meta-Analyses. Research Synthesis Methods, 11, 913-919. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1460
Greco, T., et al. (2015) The Attractiveness of Network Meta-Analysis: A Comprehensive Systematic and Narrative Review. Heart Lung and Vessels, 7, 133-142. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4476767/
Wang, F.F., et al. (2018) Pharmacologic Therapy to Induce Weight Loss in Women Who Have Obesity/Overweight with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Net-Work Meta-Analysis. Obesity Reviews, 19, 1424-1445. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12720
Zhu, L.K., et al. (2019) A New Binomial Tree Method for European Options under the Jump Diffusion Model. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 7, 3012-3021. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2019.712211
Kleinbaum, D.G. (1994) Logistic Regression. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4108-7
Collett, D. (1991) Modelling Binary Data (Hardback). Taylor & Francis, Oxfordshire.
Severini, T.A. (1998) Likelihood Functions for Inference in the Presence of a Nuisance Parameter. Biometrika, 85, 507-522. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/85.3.507
Bellio, R. and Sartori, N. (2003) Extending Conditional Likelihood in Models for Stratified Binary Data. Statistical Methods and Applications, 12, 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-003-0055-1
Hamza, T.H., van Houwelingen, H.C. and Stijnen, T. (2008) The Binomial Distribution of Meta-Analysis Was Preferred to Model Within-Study Variability. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61, 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.016
Adeniran, A.T., et al. (2020) Derivation of Gaussian Probability Distribution: A New Approach. Applied Mathematics, 11, 436-446. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2020.116031
Crouch, E.A.C. and Spiegelman, D. (1990) The Evaluation of Integrals of the Form ∫+∞ -∞ f(t)exp(-t2) dt: Application to Logistic-Normal Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 464-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1990.10476222
Shi, J.Q. and Copas, J. (2002) Publication Bias and Meta-Analysis for 2 × 2 Tables: An Average Markov Chain Monte Carlo EM Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 64, 221-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00334
Liu, Q. and Pierce, D.A. (1994) A Note on Gauss-Hermite Quadrature. Biometrika, 81, 624-629. https://doi.org/10.2307/2337136
Shaobo, J. and Björn, A. (2020) A Note on the Accuracy of Adaptive Gauss-Hermite Quadrature. Biometrika, 107, 737-744. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asz080