Trend of Random Events in Organizing When Influenced by a Non-Observable Factor
- 1 Grupo Administrativo Setorial, Secretary of State for Education of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
Abstract
This article analyzes in complex systems the web of variables that constitute the formation and behavior of an event organizing it in several probabilities. Based on the current statistical methodologies, multifactorial analysis associated with fuzzy logic, complex phenomena are analyzed by stating the influence of a variable to others and possibly indicating how complexity works. However, these analyzes have limitations regarding the scope of the samples considering the mechanics of an event determined only by the non-physical quantitative properties of variables. The mentioned limits, refers to not considering the measurement of the variable’s interactions influence in the event by analyzing the frequencies in which the interactions affect the formation and behavior of the expected event. Considering that interactions take place in the physical world, they can present non-observable physical features that influence the event. This observation can point out the periodic function in the production of the complex events that can be observed considering the frequency with which the analyzed event occurs in its physical quantitative characteristics.
- della Volpe, G. (1984) A lógica como ciência histórica. Edicoes, Lisboa, 313 p.
- Butterfield, J. and Pagonis, C. (1999) From Physics to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 235 p.
- Treier, S. and Jackman, S. (2008) Democracy as a Latent Variable. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 201-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00308.x
- Nature (2017) Statistics for Biologists. Macmillan Publishers Limited, Springer. https://www.nature.com/collections/qghhqm/pointsofsignificance
- Li, C. (2012) Latent Variable Modeling. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 24, 118-120.
- Lorenz, E.N. (1963) Deterministic Non-Periodic Flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20, 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020 2.0.CO;2
- NCBI. National Center for Biotechnology Information. A Simple Guide to Chaos and Complexity. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2465602/
- Bitar, S.D., et al. (2016) Applying Fuzzy Logic to Estimate the Parameters of the Length-Weight Relationship. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 76.
- Wilcox, Rand R. Phys.Org. (2017) New Statistical Methods Would Let Researchers Deal with Data in Better, More Robust Ways. The Conversation. https://phys.org/news/2017-05-statistical-methods-robust-ways.html#jCp
- Wilcox, R.R. and Keselman, H.J. (2012) Modern Regression Methods That Can Substantially Increase Power and Provide a More Accurate Understanding of Associations. European Journal of Personality, 26, 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.860
- Martens, M. and Winckler, B. (2014) Physical Measures for Infinitely Renormalizable Lorenz Maps. ArXiv: 1412.8041v1.
- Prazak, M. (1972) Language and Logic. Greenwood, Westport, CT, 154 p.
- Stankovski, T., et al. (2017) Coupling Functions: Universal Insights into Dynamical Interaction Mechanisms. Reviews of Modern Physics, 89, 045001.
- Nakamori, Y. and Ryoke, M. (1999) Modeling of Fuzziness in Multivariate Data Analysis. IEEE SMC’99 Conference Proceedings of Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 12-15 October 1999. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.1999.815565
- Altman, N. and Krzywinski, M. (2015) Points of Significance: Association, Correlation and Causation. Nature Methods, 12, 899-900. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3587