Traumatic Brain Injury and Cerebral Vascular Accident: Application of Rasch Analysis to Examine Differences in Disability and Outcome in Post-Hospital Rehabilitation
- 1 NeuroRestorative Research Institute, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, USA
- 2 NeuroRestorative Research Institute, College of Medicine, Florida State University, Orlando, USA
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate an application of Rasch analysis to identify differences in disability profiles resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI) and cerebral vascular accident (CVA) and to examine outcome differences between the two groups following post-hospital residential rehabilitation. Participant data w ere collected from 32 facilities in 16 states. From 2990 neurologically impaired individuals with consecutive admissions from 2011 through 2017, 874 met inclusion criteria: TBI (n = 687) or CVA (n = 187), 18 years or older, minimum length of stay of one month, and maximum chronicity of 1 year. Participants were evaluated at admission and discharge on the Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory - Version 4 (MPAI-4). Rasch analysis was performed to establish item reliability, construct validity and item difficulty. A Repeated Measures Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (RM MANCOVA) determined group differences and improvement from admission and discharge. Rasch Analysis demonstrated satisfactory construct validity and internal consistency (Person reliability > 0 .90, Item reliability > 0 .98 for admission and discharge MPAI-4s). Both groups showed significant improvement on the MPAI-4 (p < 0 .0005). The TBI group was more impaired on the adjustment scale at both admission and discharge (p < 0 .001). Rasch analysis identified two distinct impairment patterns. CVA participants exhibited deficits characteristic of focal impairment while the TBI group presented with deficits reflective of diffuse impairment. Rehabilitation was shown to be beneficial in reducing disability following neurologic injury in both groups. Importantly, Rasch Analysis accurately produced unique disability profiles that differentiated the treatment groups. This unique statistical technique offers a promising prescriptive hierarchical model for guiding neurological rehabilitation treatment.
- Center for Disease Control Health, United States (2013) National Center for Health Statistics. Hyattsville, MD.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (2015) Report to Congress: Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Epidemiology and Rehabilitation. Atlanta, GA.
- Hall, M.J., Levant, S. and DeFrances, C.J. (2012) Hospitalization for Stroke in U.S. Hospitals, 1989 -2009. NCHS Data Brief, 95, 1-8.
- Lackland, D.T., Roccella, E.J. and Deutsch, A.F. (2014) Factors Influencing the Decline in Stroke Mortality: A Statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 45, 315-353. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000437068.30550.cf
- Lewis, F. and Horn, G. (2015) Neurologic Continuum of Care: Evidence-Based Model of a Post-Hospital System of Care. Neurorehabilitation, 36, 243 -251. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-151213
- Horn, G. and Lewis, F. (2014) A Model of Care for Neurologic Rehabilitation. Journal of Nurse Life Care Planning, 14, 681-692.
- Bond, T. and Fox, C. (2007) Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. 2nd Edition, LEA, Mahwah, NJ.
- Malec, J., Kragness, M., Evans, R., Finlay, K., Kent, A. and Lezak, M. (2003) Further Psychometric Evaluation and Revision of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in a National Sample. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 18, 479-492. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-200311000-00002
- Lewis, F. and Horn, G. (2017) Rasch Analysis and Functional Measurement in Post-Hospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation. International Journal of Statistics and Probability, 6, 50-59. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijsp.v6n6p50
- Malec, J. and Lezak, M. (2008) Manual for the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) for Adults, Children and Adolescents. The Center for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury.
- Andrich, D. (1978) A Rating Formulation for Ordered Response Categories. Psychometrika, 43, 561-573. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293814
- Linacre, J. (2002) What Do Infit, Outfit, Mean-Square, and Standardization Mean? Archives of Rasch Measurement, 16, 871-882.
- Wright, B., Linacre, J. and Gustafson, J. (1994) Reasonable Mean-Square Fit Values. Rasch Measurement Transformation, 8, 370.
- Hayden, M.E., Plenger, P. and Bison, K. (2013) Treatment Effect versus Pretreatment Recovery in Persons with Acquired Brain Injury: A Study Regarding the Effectiveness of Post-Acute Rehabilitation. American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 4, 319-327.