Asymptotic Results for Goodness-of-Fit Tests Using a Class of Generalized Spacing Methods with Estimated Parameters
- 1 école d’actuariat, Université Laval, Ste Foy, Québec, Canada
Abstract
A class of pseudo distances is used to derive test statistics using transformed data or spacings for testing goodness-of-fit for parametric models. These statistics can be considered as density based statistics and expressible as simple functions of spacings. It is known that when the null hypothesis is simple, the statistics follow asymptotic normal distributions without unknown parameters. In this paper we emphasize results for the null composite hypothesis : the parameters can be estimated by a generalized spacing method (GSP) first which is equivalent to minimize a pseudo distance from the class which is considered; subsequently the estimated parameters are used to replace the parameters in the pseudo distance used for estimation ; goodness-of-fit statistics for the composite hypothesis can be constructed and shown to have again an asymptotic normal distribution without unknown parameters. Since these statistics are related to a discrepancy measure, these tests can be shown to be consistent in general. Furthermore, due to the simplicity of these statistics and they com e a no extra cost after fitting the model, they can be considered as alternative statistics to chi-square statistics which require a choice of intervals and statistics based on empirical distribution (EDF) using the original data with a complicated null distribution which might depend on the parametric family being considered and also might depend on the vector of true parameters but EDF tests might be more powerful against some specific models which are specified by the alternative hypothesis.
- Ghosh, K. and Jammalamadaka, S.R. (2001) A General Estimation Method Using Spacings. Journal of Statistical Planning Inference, 93, 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00160-9
- Luong, A. (2018) Unified Asymptotic Results for Maximum Spacing and Generalized Spacing Method for Continuous Model. Open Journal of Statistics, 8, 614-639. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2018.83040
- Cheng, R.C.H. and Stephens, M.A. (1989) A Goodness-of-Fit Test Using Moran’s Statistic with Estimated Parameters. Biometrika, 76, 385-392. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/76.2.385
- Anderson, T.W. and Darling, D.A. (1954) A Test of Goodness of Fit. Journal of American Statistical Association, 49, 765-769. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1954.10501232
- Boos, D. (1982) Minimum Anderson Darling Estimation. Communications in Statistics, Theory and Methods, 11, 2747-2774. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928208828420
- Stephens, M.A. (1986) Tests Based on EDF Statistics in Goodness-of-Fit Techniques. d’Agostino, R.B. and Stephens, M.A., Eds., Marcel Dekker, New York.
- Greenwood, P.E. and Nikulin, S.M. (1996) A Guide to Chi-Squared Testing. Wiley, New York.
- Sethuraman and Rao, J.S. (1970) Pitman Efficiencies of Tests Based on Spacings in Nonparametric Techniques in Statistical Inference. Puri, M.L., Ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Zhang, J. (2002) Powerful Goodness-of-Fit Tests Based on the Likelihood Ratio. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 62, 281-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00337
- Kale, B.K. (1969) Unified Derivation of Tests of Goodness of Fit Based on Spacings. Sankhya, Series A, 31, 43-48.
- Beran, R. (1977) Minimum Hellinger Distance Estimates for Parametric Models. Annals of Statistics, 5, 445-463. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176343842
- Pollard, D. (1980) The Minimum Distance Method of Testing. Metrika, 27, 43-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01893576
- Ali, S.M. and Silvey, S.D. (1966) A Generalized Class of Coefficients of Divergence of One Distribution from Another. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 28, 813-828.
- Pardo, L. (2006) Statistical Inference Based on Divergence Measures. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton.
- Klugman, S.A., Panjer, H.H. and Willmot, G.E. (2012) Loss Models: From Data to Decisions. 4th Edition, Wiley, New York.