Analysis of Hospital Mortality Data: The Role of DRG’s
- 1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
- 2 King Fahd Medical City, Riyadh, KSA
- 3 Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Scientific Computing, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, KSA
- 4 Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Scientific Computing, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, KSA
- 5 Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Scientific Computing, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, KSA
Abstract
Background : Factors associated with hospital mortality are usually identified and their effects are quantified through statistical modeling. To guide the choice of the best statistical model, we first quantify the predictive ability of each model and then use the CIHI index to see if the hospital policy needs any change. Objectives : The main purpose of this study compared three statistical models in the evaluation of the association between hospital mortality and two risk factors, namely subject’s age at admission and the length of stay, adjusting for the effect of Diagnostic Related Groups (DRG). Methods : We use several SAS procedures to quantify the effect of DRG on the variability in hospital mortality. These procedures are the Logistic Regression model (ignoring the DRG effect), the Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) that takes into account the within DRG clustering effect (but the within cluster correlation is treated as nuisance parameter), and the Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLIMMIX). We showed that the GLIMMIX is superior to other models as it properly account s for the clustering effect of “Diagnostic Related Groups” denoted by DRG. Results : The GLM procedure showed that the proportional contribution of DRG is 16%. All three models showed significant and increasing trend in mortality (P < 0.0001) with respect to the two risk factors (age at admission, and hospital length of stay). It was also clear that the CIHI index was not different under the three models. We re-estimated the models parameters after dichotomizing the risk factors at the optimal cut-off points, using the ROC curve. The parameters estimates and their significance did not change.
- Blackford, G. (2008) Discover How to Survive Medicare Severity DRGs with a Successful Clinical Documentation Improvement Program and Present on Admission Indicators. 2008 AHIMA Convention Proceedings, 11-16 October 2008, Seattle, WA.
- Glance, L.G., Dick, A.W., Mukamel, D.B., et al. (2010) How Well Do Hospital Mortality Rates Reported in the New York State. CABG Reportcards Predict Subsequent Hospital Performance? Medical Care, 48, 466-471. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d568f7
- Mayes, R. (2007) The Origins, Development, and Passage of Medicare's Revolutionary Prospective Payment System. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 62, 21-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrj038
- Donabedian, A. (1988) The Quality of Care. How Can It Be Assessed? JAMA, 260, 1743-1748. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033
- Krumholz, H.M. (2008) Outcomes Research: Generating Evidence for Best Practice. Circulation, 118, 309-318. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.690917
- Martin, G. (2008) MS-DRG Journey: How One Hospital Joined Together to Successfully Implement MS-DRGs. Journal of AHIMA, 79, 70-72.
- SAS Institute (2010) STAT-SAS, Version 9.4. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
- Shoukri, M. (2010) Measures of Inter-Observer Agreement and Reliability. Chapman and Hall-CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10433
- Canadian Institute for Health Information (2009) The CIHI Data Quality Framework.
- Quality Framework (2009). http://www.cihi.ca/CIHI-ext-portal/pdf/internet/DATA
- Liang, K.Y. and Zeger, S.L. (1993) Regression Analysis for Correlated Data. Annual Review of Public Health, 14, 43-68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pu.14.050193.000355