A composite random variable is a product (or sum of products) of statistically distributed quantities. Such a variable can represent the solution to a multi-factor quantitative problem submitted to a large, diverse, independent, anonymous group of non-expert respondents (the “crowd”). The objective of this research is to examine the statistical distribution of solutions from a large crowd to a quantitative problem involving image analysis and object counting. Theoretical analysis by the author, covering a range of conditions and types of factor variables, predicts that composite random variables are distributed log-normally to an excellent approximation. If the factors in a problem are themselves distributed log-normally, then their product is rigorously log-normal. A crowdsourcing experiment devised by the author and implemented with the assistance of a BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) television show, yielded a sample of approximately 2000 responses consistent with a log-normal distribution. The sample mean was within ~12% of the true count. However, a Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) of the experiment, employing either normal or log-normal random variables as factors to model the processes by which a crowd of 1 million might arrive at their estimates, resulted in a visually perfect log-normal distribution with a mean response within ~5% of the true count. The results of this research suggest that a well-modeled MCS, by simulating a sample of responses from a large, rational, and incentivized crowd, can provide a more accurate solution to a quantitative problem than might be attainable by direct sampling of a smaller crowd or an uninformed crowd, irrespective of size, that guesses randomly.
KeywordsCrowdsourcingComputer Modeling of CrowdsMonte Carlo SimulationLarge-Scale SamplingLog-Normal Random VariableLog-Normal Distribution
Surowiecki, J. (2005) The Wisdom of the Crowds. Anchor, New York.
Galton, F. (1907) Vox Populi (Voice of the People). Nature, 75, 450-451. https://doi.org/10.1038/075450a0
Galton, F. (1907) The Ballot Box. Nature, 75, 509. https://doi.org/10.1038/075509e0
Wazny, K. (2017) “Crowdsourcing” Ten Years in: A Review. Journal of Global Health, 7, Article ID: 020602. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.07.020601 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5735781
Boland, P.J. (1989) Majority Systems and the Condorcet Jury Theorem. The Statistician, 38, 181-189. https://doi.org/10.2307/2348873
Jin, Y., Carman, M., Zhu, Y. and Xiang, Y. (2018) A Technical Survey on Statistical Modeling and Design Methods for Crowdsourcing Quality Control. arXiv: 1812.02736v1.
Baba, Y. and Kashima, H. (2013) Statistical Quality Estimation for General Crowdsourcing Tasks. In: Ghani, R., Senator, T.E., Bradley, P., Parekh, R. and He, J., Eds., Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM, New York, 8-9. https://doi.org/10.1145/2487575.2487600
Guazzini, A., Vilone, D., Donati, C., Nardi, A. and Levnajic, Z. (2015) Modeling Crowdsourcing as Collective Problem Solving. Nature Scientific Reports, 5, Article ID: 16557. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16557
Vaughan, J.W. (2018) Making Better Use of the Crowd: How Crowdsourcing Can Advance Machine Learning Research. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 18, 1-46.
Silverman, M.P. (2014) A Certain Uncertainty: Nature’s Random Ways. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 457-514. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507370
Wikipedia (2019) Composite Number. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composite_number
Vera, A. and Salge, T.O. (2017) Crowdsourcing and Policing: Opportunities for Research and Practice. European Police Science and Research Bulletin, 16, 143-154.
Stinson, L. (2017) Want to Be a Space Archaeologist? Here's Your Chance. Wired. https://www.wired.com/2017/01/want-space-archaeologist-heres-chance/
Pellerin, C. (2016) DoD Crowdsourcing Effort Produces Innovative Operational Approaches. DOD News. https://dod.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/1035881/dod-crowdsourcing-effort-produces-innovative-operational-approaches/
Kelly, M.L. (2018) Intelligence Community Looking at Crowdsourcing for Predicting Geopolitical Events. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2018/01/26/581142439/intelligence-community-looking-at-crowdsourcing-for-predicting-geopolitical-even
Arfken, G. and Weber, H. (2005) Mathematical Methods for Physicists. Elsevier, Burlington, MA, 93.
Hogg, R.V., McKean, J.W. and Craig, A.T. (2005) Introduction to Mathematical Statistics. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 64.
Kendall, M.G. and Stuart, A. (1963) The Advanced Theory of Statistics: Distribution Theory. Hafner, New York, 60-62.
Mood, A.M., Graybill, F.A. and Boes, D.C. (1974) Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 540-541.
Forbes, C., Evans, M., Hastings, N. and Peacock, B. (2011) Statistical Distributions. 4th Edition, Wiley, New York, 143-146. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470627242
Hald, A. (1952) Statistical Theory with Engineering Applications. Wiley, New York, 188-195.
Jeffreys, H. (1961) Theory of Probability. 3rd Edition, Oxford University Press, London, 95-103.
Altman, D.G. (1991) Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall, New York, 132-146.
Weaver, W. (1963) Lady Luck: The Theory of Probability. Anchor Books, Garden City, New York, 255-264.
Boot, J.C.G. and Cox, E.B. (1974) Statistical Analysis for Managerial Decisions. McGraw-Hill, New York, 163-164.
Bendat, J.S. and Piersol, A.G. (1966) Measurement and Analysis of Random Data. Wiley, New York, 41-43.
Wilson, R.G. (1995) Fourier Series and Optical Transform Techniques in Contemporary Optics. Wiley, New York, 281-303.
Kempthorne, O. and Folks, L. (1971) Probability, Statistics, and Data Analysis. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, 242-291.
Wikipedia. Normal Distribution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_distribution
Silverman, M.P. (2019) Progressive Randomization of a Deck of Playing Cards: Experimental Tests and Statistical Analysis of the Riffle Shuffle. Open Journal of Statistics, 9, 268-298. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2019.92020
Wang, Y., Li, Y., Cao, H., Xiong, M., Shugart, Y. and Jin, L. (2015) Efficient Test for Nonlinear Dependence of Two Continuous Variables. BMC Bioinformatics, 16, 260. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0697-7
Dufresne, D. (2004) The Log-Normal Approximation in Financial and Other Computations. Advances in Applied Probability, 34, 747-773. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001867800013094
Fenton, L.F. (1960) The Sum of Lognormal Probability Distributions in Scatter Transmission Systems. IRE Transactions on Communications Systems, 8, 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1960.1097606
Wu, J., Mehta, N.B. and Zhang, J. (2005) Flexible Lognormal Sum Approximation Method. 2005 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, St. Louis, MO, 28 November-2 December 2005, 3413-3417.
Cobb, B.R., Rumi, R. and Salmeron, A. (2012) Approximating the Distribution of a Sum of Log-Normal Random Variables. The Sixth European Workshop on Probabilistic Graphical Models, Granada, Spain, 19-21 September 2012, 67-74. https://www.academia.edu/14441554/Approximating_the_Distribution_of_a_Sum_of_Log-normal_Random_Variables