The Effectiveness of Model Rocketry to Teach Science and Quantitative Content to Students in a Non-Science Majors Course at the College Level: An Example from a Planetary Geology Course — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
The Effectiveness of Model Rocketry to Teach Science and Quantitative Content to Students in a Non-Science Majors Course at the College Level: An Example from a Planetary Geology Course
Department of Geology, Mercyhurst University, Erie, PA, USA
1 Department of Geology, Mercyhurst University, Erie, PA, USA
Engaging non-science majors in a college-level science course can prove challenging. In turn, this can make it difficult to effectively teach science and math content. However, topics related to planetary exploration have a unique way of capturing one’s imagination and may serve to robustly engage non-science majors. In this contribution, I 1) describe a model rocketry lab module , I have created and implemented into an introductory-level planetary geology course and 2) quantify student learning gains as a result of this module. This module builds on model rocketry lesson plans for science and math coursework at the K-12 level ( e.g., [1] [2] ) and involves students working in groups to 1) design and build model rockets to carry out a theoretical mission that addresses a science question the students have developed, 2) launch their rockets and collect related data, 3) synthesize and evaluate their data, and 4) report their results in both oral and written forms. The tasks of building and launching the model rocket serve as a vehicle that allows students to employ the scientific process while learning about planetary mission design and applying geologic and quantitative skills useful to answering a science-related question. Quantification of student learning gains shows that through this lab module, students significantly improved their quantitative and scientific reasoning skills. Results from student questionnaires showed a significant increase in student interest and confidence in addressing scientific questions as well as an understanding of how planetary missions are designed and conducted.
Petrosino, A.J. (1997) Authentic Experience within Investigative Activities: The Role of Reflection in the Learning Environment. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, 24-28 March 1997.
Sarradet Jr., T.M. (2009) A STEM Based Model Rocketry Curriculum: For the Team America Rocketry Challenge. California State University, Sacramento, CA, 109 p.
Anderson, G.A. and Claswson, K. (1992) Science Anxiety in Our Colleges: Origins, Implications, and Cures. The Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Knoxville, TN, 11-13 November 1992.
Gogolin, L. and Swartz, F. (1992) A Quantitative and Qualitative Inquiry into the Attitudes toward Science of Nonscience College Students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 487-504. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290505
Druger, M. (1998) Creating a Motivational Learning Environment in Large, Introductory Science Courses. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 27, 80-82.
Mallow, J.V. (2006) Science Anxiety: Research and Action in Handbook of College Science Teaching. National Science Teachers Association, Arlington, VA, 3-4.
Siebert, E.D. (2001) Science Education Program Standards. In: Siebert, E.D. and McIntosh, W.J., Eds., College Pathways to the Science Education Standards, NSTA Press, Arlington, VA, 192 p.
Deal, K.H. and Hyde, C.A. (2004) Understanding MSW Student Anxiety and Resistance to Multicultural Learning. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 24, 83-86. https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v24n01_05
Micari, M. and Pazos, P. (2012) Connecting to the Professor: Impact of the Student-Faculty Relationship in a Highly Challenging Course. College Teaching, 60, 41-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2011.627576
Mason, C.L. (1992) Concept Mapping: A Tool to Develop Reflective Science Instruction. Science Education, 76, 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760105
Hodson, D. and Hodson, J. (1998) Science Education as Enculturation: Some Implications for Practice. School Science Review, 80, 17-24.
Udo, M.K., Ramsey, G.P. and Mallow, J.V. (2004) Science Anxiety and Gender in Students Taking General Education Science Courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 435-446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-004-1465-z
Prather, E. (2005) Students’ Beliefs about the Role of Atoms in Radioactive Decay and Half-Life. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 345-354. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.345
Glynn, S.M., Taasoobshirazi, G. and Brickman, P. (2007) Nonscience Majors Learning Science: A Theoretical Model of Motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1088-1107. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20181
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B. and Armstrong, N. (2009) Effects of Inquiry-Based Learning on Students’ Science Literacy Skills and Confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3, Article No. 16. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030216
Stine, G.H. and Stine, B. (2004) Handbook of Model Rocketry. 7th Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 363 p.
Saltrick, D.F. and Kubota, A.M. (1970) Aerospace Education and Model Rocketry: An Educator's Guide for Grades Four through Ten. Estes Industries, Penrose, CO.
Nolte, S. and Stoops, N. (1992) Science and Model Rockets: A Curriculum for Grades 5,6,7,8. Estes Industries, Penrose, CO.
Nolte, S. (1994) Mathematics and Model Rockets: A Curriculum for Grades 5-12. Estes Industries, Penrose, CO.
Kalk, R. and Wash, S. (1995) Industrial Technology and Model Rockets: A Curriculum for Grades 6-12. Estes Industries, Penrose, CO.
Nielsen, L.B. (1997) Blast off! Rocketry for Elementary and Middle School Students. Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT.
Leonard, J. and Oakley, J.E. (2006) We Have Liftoff! Integrating Space Science and Mathematics in Elementary Classrooms. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54, 452-457. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-54.4.452
Shearer, D.A. and Vogt, G.L. (2008) Rockets. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington DC. http://www.nasa.gov/audience/foreducators/topnav/materials/listbytype/Rockets.html
Marshall Space Flight Center (2002) NASA’s Marshall Center to Help Rocket-Building Texas Students Get Their Project off the Ground. https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2000-08/NSFC-NMCt-0108100.php
NASA [2011) Rockets Educator Guide. EG-2011-11-223-KSC. NASA, Washington DC.
Harper, G.D.J. (2007) 50 Model Rocket Projects for the Evil Genius. McGraw Hill Publishing, New York, 197 p.
Niemi Jr., E.E. (2002) Using Model Rocketry to Introduce Students to Aerospace Engineering. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
Rojas, J.I., Prats, X., Montlaur, A. and Garcia-Berra, E. (2008) Model Rocket Workshop: A Problem-Based Learning Experience for Engineering Students. International Journal of Engineering Technologies in Learning, 3, 70-77. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v3i4.290
Jayaram, S., Boyer, L., George, J., Ravindra, K. and Mitchell, K. (2010) Project-Based Introduction to Aerospace Engineering Course: A Model Rocket. Acta Astronautica, 66, 1525-1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.10.038
D’Alessio, M. and Lundquist, L. (2013) Computer Supported Collaborative Rocketry: Teaching Students to Distinguish Good and Bad Data Like Expert Physicists. The Physics Teacher, 51, 424. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4820858
Estes Industries (2019) Frequently Asked Questions. https://estesrockets.com/faqs/
Dunlosky, J. and Rawson, K.A. (2012) Overconfidence Produces Underachievement: Inaccurate Self Evaluations Undermine Students’ Learning and Retention. Learning and Instruction, 22, 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.003
Moore, D.S. (1995) The Basic Practice of Statistics. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 774 p.