Value of Water Based upon Retail Sales Tax Revenue
- 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (Ph.D. Retired), Rapid City, South Dakota, USA
Abstract
In quantifying the benefits of compost amendments to soils for agricultural and urban use in terms of water conservation, there are many difficulties in conveying “value” of water due to the many different aspects of value to individuals and organizations. Perhaps the most universal metric for value is through the net monetary impact of water. Therefore, it is necessary to quantify the benefits by placing a dollar value on the amount of water conserved by amending soils with compost. In most of the literature, the value of water is rarely defined, and when it is the value presented is actually the “cost” of water production or reclamation. However, to truly understand the impacts of water conservation, a fuller vision of the value of water is needed beyond the costs of water. In this paper, the value of water is developed for the Rapid City, South Dakota area. With a value of water established, the benefits of soil compost amendments are calculated by evaluating the reduction of irrigation water needed for comparable crops and the value of the conserved water. In developing a value of water for Rapid City, South Dakota, the direct costs for water production are compared with the retail value of water and the economic activity enabled by a water supply. The average cost of water production for South Dakota cities averaged $0.004 per gallon ($0.001/Liter). The analysis of retail value and economic impact showed that water is valued at $0.71 per gallon ($0.19/Liter) for Rapid City and nine other South Dakota communities when calculated using the community’s retail sales records and economic reports. Efforts to find similar findings for the US were not found. With the value of water established for Rapid City and other South Dakota communities, the value benefits of compost amendments on water conservation are shown in direct monetary terms.
- Fuller, T. (2015) The History of the Worthies of England. Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316136270
- Clay, D. (2015) Higher Organic Matter Content.
- Curtis, M.J. and Claassen, V.P. (2009) Regenerating Topsoil Functionality in Four Drastically Disturbed Soil Types by Compost Incorporation. Restoration Ecology, 17, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00329.x
- Hudson, B.D. (1994) Soil Organic Matter and Available Water Capacity. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 49, 189-194.
- Dalal, R. (1998) Soil Microbial Biomass—What Do the Numbers Really Mean? Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 38, 649-665. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA97142
- Dieter, C.A., et al. (2018) Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2015. US Geological Survey.
- Wright, J.T. (2019) Conservation of Irrigation Water through the Use of Compost as a Soil Amendment in Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, 126.
- Moore, M.R. (1991) The Bureau of Reclamation’s New Mandate for Irrigation Water Conservation: Purposes and Policy Alternatives. Water Resources Research, 27, 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1029/90WR02403
- Reisner, M. (1993) Cadillac Desert: The American West and Its Disappearing Water. Penguin, London.
- Barlow, M. and Clarke, T. (2002) Who Owns Water? The Nation, 2, 11-14.
- Ward, F.A. and Pulido-Velazquez, M. (2008) Water Conservation in Irrigation Can Increase Water Use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 18215-18220. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805554105
- Lubchenco, J. (1998) Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science. Science, 279, 491-497. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5350.491
- Ward, F.A. and Michelsen, A. (2002) The Economic Value of Water in Agriculture: Concepts and Policy Applications. Water Policy, 4, 423-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00039-9
- Selby, J. (2005) Oil and Water: The Contrasting Anatomies of Resource Conflicts. Government and Opposition, 40, 200-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2005.00150.x
- Department, C.o.R.C.P. (2018) Population Data.
- Rapid City Economic Development Office (2016) Population and Economic Data.