Why Were the Soil Tunnels of Cu Chi and Iron Triangle in Vietnam So Resilient?
- 1 College of Agricultural, Consumer, and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
- 2 College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
Abstract
At the peak of the Vietnam War, the network of tunnels in the Iron Triangle and Cu Chi linked Viet Cong (VC) support bases over a distance of some 250 km, from the Ho Chi Minh Trail and Cambodian border to the outskirts Saigon. In the early 1960s, the United States escalated its military presence in Vietnam in support of a non-Communist regime in South Vietnam. The North Vietnamese and VC troops gradually expanded the tunnels. Tunnels frequently were dug by hand in Old Alluvium terraces, and only a short distance at a time. Four major efforts were made by the US Military to locate and destroy these tunnels. These included Operation Crimp, a search and destroy mission which began in 1966 and a geological and soil survey approach was used to detect VC tunnels. Later in 1967, General William Westmoreland tried launching a larger assault on Cu Chi and the Iron Triangle areas. The operation called Operation Cedar Falls was an expanded version of Operation Crimp. Finally in 1969, B-52s started carpet bombing the Cu Chi and Iron Triangle areas and destroyed many of the tunnels. However, not before the tunnels had proven very effective in 1960s at hiding and protecting the VC during US occupation of the area. The nature and properties of the Old Alluvium soils were key to the soil tunnels being so resilient. Soils located in Old Alluvium terraces had high levels of clay and iron. Iron (Fe) leached from the upper soil layers (0 to 1.5 m) and accumulated in the lower layers (1.5 to 20 m) and became a cement-like binding agent. When dried the soil layers took on properties close to concrete, and were resistant to ever becoming soft and moist again especially around the aerated tunnel walls. The tunnels were dug in the monsoon season when the upper layers of soil were soft and moist but not in dry season. The soils were highly stable without any lining or support. After drying out, the soil materials surrounding the tunnel turned into concrete like material that could withstand adjacent explosive blasts.
- Kyuma, K. and Kawaguchi, K. (1966) Major Soils of Southeast Asia and the Classification of Soils under Rice Cultivation (Paddy Soils). https://kyoto-seas.org/pdf/4/2/040207.pdf
- Moormann, F.R. (1961) The Soils of the Republic of Vietnam. Ministry of Agriculture, Saigon.
- Dudal, R. and Moormann, F.R. (1964) Major Soils of South-East Asia. Journal of Tropical Geography, 18, 54-80.
- Aki, K. and Berthelot, R. (1973) Hydrology of Humid Topical ASIA. UNESCO, Natural Resources of Humid Topical Asia, Natural Resources Research XII, 145-158.
- Burns, J. (2015) Vietnam ’66: A Personal Experience of the War. Pietas Publications, Waynesboro.
- Dudal, R., Moormann, F. and Riquier, J. (1974) Soils of Humid Topical Asia. UNESCO, Natural Resources of Humid Topical Asia, Natural Resources Research XII, 159-173.
- Goscha, C. (2016) Vietnam: A New History. Basic Books, New York.
- Almodovar, R.W. and Rogers, J.D. (1969) The Tunnels of Cu Chi. Sapper Eagle Power Point Slide Set. http://www.wood.army.mil/usaes/library/documents/CuChiTunnels.pdf
- Rottman, G.L. (2006) Viet Cong and NVA Tunnels and Fortifications of the Vietnam War (Fortress). Paper Back. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, Oxford, UK.
- Rottman, G.L. (2012) Tunnel Rat in Vietnam (Warrior). Paper Back. Osprey Publishing, New York.
- Mangold, T. and Penycate, J. (2005) The Tunnels of Cu Chi. A Harrowing Account of America’s Tunnel Rats in the Underground Battlefields of Vietnam. Tom Mangold Mass Market Paperback.