Purpose: We evaluated the findings from 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET-CTs performed on patients presenting biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) and assessed its impact on staging. Methods and materials: This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with PCa and BCR who underwent 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET-CT in 2020. The patients were stratified into two groups: BCR after prostatectomy (PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL) or BCR after radiotherapy (PSA ≥ 2 ng/mL + nadir). We analyzed the lesions according to number and location. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to estimate the distribution of the variables. We calculated representative statistics for the quantitative variables including the mean, standard deviation, median, and interquartile range. The association between qualitative variables was examined using Chi-squared tests. Results: 40 patients with BCR were analyzed; 67.5% presented disease progression, predominantly distant recurrence (42.5%), which was found exclusively in bone; 55% presented ≤5 lesions and of these, 68.2% only presented 1 lesion. There was a change in staging in 66.7% of the cases; 17.7% received ablative treatment with stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR). Conclusions: 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET-CT represents a new way to manage patients with BCR that, in this study, resulted in a change in staging in 66.7% of cases and early identification of oligometastatic progressions in the subgroup of patients with PSA < 0.5 ng/mL.
KeywordsProstate Specific Membrane AntigenProstate CancerPET-CT PSMA 18F-DCFPyLBiochemical Recurrence
Sociedad española de Oncología médica [SEOM]. Las cifras del cáncer en España 2020. https://www.seom.org
INE. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. España y la UE: Una comparativa sobre la mortalidad por cáncer. https://www.ine.es/index.htm
Estimaciones de la incidencia del cáncer en España, 2021. Red Española de Registros de Cáncer (REDECAN), 2021.
Bott, S.R.J. (2004) Management of Recurrent Disease after Radical Prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 7, 211-216. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500732
Uroweb. European Association of Urology (EAU). Prostate Cancer Guidelines 2019. https://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer
Pollack, A., Hanlon, A.L., Horwitz, E.M., Feigenberg, S.J., Uzzo, R.G., Hanks, G.E. (2004) Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy Dose Response: An Update of the Fox Chase Experience. The Journal of Urology, 171, 1132-1136. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000111844.95024.74
Li, R., Ravizzini, G.C., Gorin, M.A., et al. (2018) The Use of PET/CT in Prostate Cancer. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 21, 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-017-0007-8
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Prostate Cancer (Version 2.2021). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf
Wallitt, K.L., Khan, S.R., Dubash, S., Tam, H.H., Khan, S. and Barwick, T.D. (2017) Clinical PET Imaging in Prostate Cancer. RadioGraphics, 37, 1512-1536. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017170035
Dietlein, M., Kobe, C., Kuhnert, G., et al. (2015) Comparison of [18F]DCFPyL and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET Imaging in Patients with Relapsed Prostate Cancer. Molecular Imaging and Biology, 17, 575-584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-015-0866-0
Gorin, M.A., Rowe, S.P., Patel, H.D., et al. (2018) Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Targeted 18F-DCFPyL Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for the Preoperative Staging of High Risk Prostate Cancer: Results of a Prospective, Phase II, Single Center Study. The Journal of Urology, 199, 126-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.070
Giesel, F.L., Will, L., Lawal, I., et al. (2018) Intraindividual Comparison of 18 F-PSMA-1007 and 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT in the Prospective Evaluation of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Carcinoma: A Pilot Study. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 59, 1076-1080. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.204669
Roach, M., Hanks, G., Thames, H., et al. (2006) Defining Biochemical Failure Following Radiotherapy with or without Hormonal Therapy in Men with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, 65, 965-974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.029
Kaalep, A., Huisman, M., Sera, T., Vugts, D., Boellaard, R., EARL, EATRIS, TRISTAN Consortium (#IB4SD-116106) (2018) Feasibility of PET/CT System Performance Harmonisation for Quantitative Multicentre 89Zr Studies. EJNMMI Physics, 5, Article No. 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0226-7
Rowe, S.P., Pienta, K.J., Pomper, M.G. and Gorin, M.A. (2018) PSMA-RADS Version 1.0: A Step towards Standardizing the Interpretation and Reporting of PSMA-Targeted PET Imaging Studies. European Urology, 73, 485-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.10.027
Fendler, W.P., Eiber, M., Beheshti, M., et al. (2017) 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: Joint EANM and SNMMI Procedure Guideline for Prostate Cancer Imaging: Version 1.0. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 44, 1014-1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3670-z
Wahl, R.L., Jacene, H., Kasamon, Y. and Lodge, M.A. (2009) From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 50, 122S-150S. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.057307
Ziai, P., Hayeri, M.R., Salei, A., et al. (2016) Role of Optimal Quantification of FDG PET Imaging in the Clinical Practice of Radiology. RadioGraphics, 36, 481-496. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2016150102
Hope, T.A., Aggarwal, R., Chee, B., et al. (2017) Impact of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET on Management in Patients with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 58, 1956-1961. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.192476
Ceci, F., Castellucci, P., Graziani, T., et al. (2019) 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Efficacy in Different Clinical Stages of PSA Failure after Radical Therapy. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 46, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4189-7
Rousseau, E., Wilson, D., Lacroix-Poisson, F., et al. (2019) A Prospective Study on 18 F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT Imaging in Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 60, 1587-1593. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.226381
Giesel, F.L., Knorr, K., Spohn, F., et al. (2019) Detection Efficacy of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 60, 362-368. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.212233
Pernthaler, B., Kulnik, R., Gstettner, C., Salamon, S., Aigner, R.M. and Kvaternik, H. (2019) A Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison of 18 F-Fluciclovine with 68 Ga-PSMA-11 in Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer in PET/CT. Clinical Nuclear Medicine, 44, e566-e573. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000002703
EU Clinical Trials Register (2020, February) A Prospective Study on 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT Imaging in Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer. PYTHON. EudraCT Number: 2020-000121-37. https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2020-000121-37/FR
Koo, K.C. and Dasgupta, P. (2018) Treatment of Oligometastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Yonsei Medical Journal, 59, 567-579. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2018.59.5.567
Lievens, Y., Guckenberger, M., Gomez, D., et al. (2020) Defining Oligometastatic Disease from a Radiation Oncology Perspective: An ESTRO-ASTRO Consensus Document. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 148, 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.003
Ost, P., Reynders, D., Decaestecker, K., et al. (2018) Surveillance or Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Recurrence: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Phase II Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 36, 446-453. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4853
Phillips, R., Shi, W.Y., Deek, M., et al. (2020) Outcomes of Observation vs Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The ORIOLE Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncology, 6, 650. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0147
Song, H., Harrison, C., Duan, H., et al. (2020) Prospective Evaluation of 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer in an Academic Center: A Focus on Disease Localization and Changes in Management. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 61, 546-551. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.231654
Chi, K.N., Agarwal, N., Bjartell, A., et al. (2019) Apalutamide for Metastatic, Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine, 381, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1903307