Suprapubic Cystostomy at Urological Emergency Unit of CHU-YO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso: Indications, Technique and Complications
- 1 Department of Urology, Yalgado Ouédraogo Teaching Hospital, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
- 2 Department of Urology, Yalgado Ouédraogo Teaching Hospital, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
- 3 Department of Urology, Yalgado Ouédraogo Teaching Hospital, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
- 4 Department of Urology, Yalgado Ouédraogo Teaching Hospital, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
- 5 Department of Urology, Yalgado Ouédraogo Teaching Hospital, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
- 6 Department of Urology, Yalgado Ouédraogo Teaching Hospital, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
- 7 Department of Urology, Yalgado Ouédraogo Teaching Hospital, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
- 8 Department of Urology, Sanon Souro Teaching Hospital, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
- 9 Department of Urology, Sanon Souro Teaching Hospital, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
Abstract
Introduction: Cystostomy allows under certain circumstances deriving the urine. This is the most performed surgery in uro-andrological emergencies. Complications can occur. We aim to analyze the indications, technical aspects and complications of suprapubic cystostomies in the urological emergency unit at CHU-YO. Patients and Methods: Between October 2013 and May 2014 we conducted a prospective study of all patients who underwent suprapubic cystostomy. Results: 86 cases of cystostomy were noted or 77.5% of surgical procedures performed in uro-andrological emergency. All patients were male. The average age of patients was 52.5 years. The AUR represented 88.4% of indications. The prostate tumor represented 65.8% of the etiologies of AUR. The cystostomy was performed under local anesthesia in 87.2% of cases. Peritoneal gap was noted in 5.8%, parietal suppuration in 12.8%. A death by generalized acute peritonitis was noted in one case. Conclusion: Suprapubic cystostomy presents a non-negligible morbidity and mortality and must be mastered.
- Rajmohan, R., Aguilar-Davidov, B., Tokas, T., Rassweiler, J. and Gozen, A.S. (2013) Iatrogenic Direct Rectal Injury: An Unusual Complication during Suprapubic Cystostomy (SPC) Insertion and Its Laparoscopic Management. Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia, 85, 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2013.2.101
- Fall, B., et al. (2008) Les urgences urologiques en milieu hospitalier universitaire à DAKAR: Aspects épidémiologi-ques, cliniques et thérapeutiques. Progrès en Urologie, 18, 650-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2008.04.004
- Tfeil, Y., et al. (2010) Les urgences urologiques au centre hospitalier national de Nouakchott: Aspects épidémiologi- ques, cliniques et thérapeutiques. Andrologie, 20, 144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12610-010-0077-4
- Ahluwalia, R.S., et al. (2006) The Surgical Risk of Suprapubic Catheter Insertion and Long-Term Sequelae. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 88, 210-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588406X95101
- Gallagher, K.M., et al. (2013) Small Bowel Injury after Suprapubic Catheter Insertion Presenting 3 Years after Initial Insertion. BMJ Case Reports.
- Diallo, A.B., et al. (2010) Le profil des urgences urologiques au CHU de Conakry, Guinée. Progrès en Urologie, 20, 214-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2009.10.008
- Boissier, R. (2012) Prise en charge d’une rétention aigue d’urine. Journal Européen des Urgences et de Réanimation, 24, 78-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurea.2012.04.001
- Cho, K.H., Doo, S.W., Yang, W.J., Song, Y.S. and Lee, K.H. (2010) Suprapubic Cystostomy: Risk Analysis of Possible Bowel Interposition through the Percutaneous Tract by Computed Tomography. Korean Journal of Urology, 51, 709-712. http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.10.709