Antioxidant Properties and Chemical Composition Relationship of Europeans and Brazilians Propolis
- 1 Department of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems, University Ca’ Foscari of Venice, Venice, Italy
- 2 Department of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems, University Ca’ Foscari of Venice, Venice, Italy
- 3 Depatment of Biotechnology and Bioecology, Astrakhan State University (ASU), Astrakan, Russia
- 4 Institute for the Dynamics of Environmental Processes, CNR, University Ca’ Foscari of Venice, Venice, Italy
- 5 Institute for the Dynamics of Environmental Processes, CNR, University Ca’ Foscari of Venice, Venice, Italy
- 6 Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, University Ca’ Foscari of Venice, Venice, Italy
- 7 Institute of Biosciences, S?o Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil
- 8 Department of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems, University Ca’ Foscari of Venice, Venice, Italy
Abstract
The antioxidant activity of ethanol extracts of propolis, bee glue, of various climate and orographic characteristics, col lected from Italy, Brazil and Russia, was evaluated measuring their inhibitory action on peroxidation of linoleic acid, radical scavenging ability towards 2,2’-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, total phenolic content and reducing capacity by en zymatic and Folin method respectively. Propolis samples were chemically characterized by HPLC-MS/MS in order to find a possible correlation between antioxidant activity and polyphenols composition and quantification. The results obtained indicate that Italian and Russian propolis samples have similar polyphenolic composition and, as a consequence, almost similar antioxidant activity, while Brazilian propolis evidence lower polyphenolic and antioxidant characteristics. Climate and orography reasons of these differences are also suggested.
- M. C. Marcucci and V. Bankova, “Chemical Composition, Plant Origin and Biological Activity of Brazilian Propolis,” Current Topics in Phytochemistry, Vol. 2, 1999, pp. 115-123.
- G. A. Burdock, “Review of the Biological Properties and Toxicity of Bee Propolis,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, Vol. 36, No. 4, 1998, pp. 347-363. doi:10.1016/S0278-6915(97)00145-2
- A. H. Banskota, Y. Tezuka and S. Kadota, “Recent Progress in Pharmacological Research of Propolis,” Phytotherapy Research, Vol. 15, No. 7, 2001, pp. 561-571. doi:10.1002/ptr.1029
- E. L. Ghisalberti, P. R. Jefferies, R. Lanteri and J. Matisons, “Constituents of Propolis,” Experientia, Vol. 34, No. 2, 1978, pp. 157-158. doi:10.1007/BF01944648
- V. Bankova, A. Dyulgerov, S. Popov, L. Evstatieva, L. Kuleva, O. Pureb and Z. Zamjansan, “Propolis Produced in Bulgaria and Mongolia: Phenolic Compounds and Plant Origin,” Apidologie, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1992, pp. 79-85. doi:10.1051/apido:19920109
- S. A. Popravko and M. V. Sokolov, “Plant Sources of Propolis,” Pchelovodstvo, Vol. 2, 1980, pp. 28-29.
- Y. K. Park, S. M. Alencar, C. L. Aguiar, “Botanical Origin and Chemical Composition of Brazilian Propolis,” Journal of Agricolture and Food Chemistry, Vol. 50, No. 9, 2002, pp. 2502-2506. doi:10.1021/jf011432b
- K. Salom?o, A. P. Dantas, C. M. Borba, L. C. Campos, D. G. Machado, F. R. Aquino Neto and S. L. De Castro, “Chemical Composition and Microbicidal Activity of Extracts from Brazilian and Bulgarian Propolis,” Letters of Applied Microbiology, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2004, pp. 87-92. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2003.01458.x
- M. C. Marcucci, “Propolis: Chemical Composition, Biological Properties and Therapeutic Activity,” Apidologie, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1995, pp. 83-99. doi:10.1051/apido:19950202
- V. S. Bankova, S. L. D. Castro and M. C. Marcucci, “Propolis: Recent Advances in Chemistry and Plant Origin,” Apidologie, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2000, pp. 3-15. doi:10.1051/apido:2000102
- E. Gregoris and R. Stevanato, “Correlations between Polyphenolic Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Venetian Propolis,” Food Chemical Toxicology, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2010, pp. 76-82. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2009.09.018
- S. Tazawa, T. Warashina, T. Noro and T. Miyase, “Studies on the Constituents of Brazilian Propolis,” Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bullettin, Vol. 46, 1998, pp. 1477-1479. doi:10.1248/cpb.46.1477