Scholastic Achievement Levels and Conformity of Junior High School Students in the Asch Experiment
- 1 Kohoku Junior High School, Nagano, Japan
- 2 University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA, USA
- 3 Matsumoto University, Matsumoto, Japan
Abstract
We examined the influence of scholastic achievement levels on conformity behavior in the modified Asch experiment without using confederates ( Mori & Arai, 2010 ). Four hundred and sixteen Japanese junior high school students (12 - 14 years old) were classified into three groups based on their scholastic achievement: high, middle, and low. We then created 22 same-sex groups (half male, half female). Each group included one high or low achievement “minority” student and three “majority” students who were all high or all low achievement students. The results showed that low achievement students in the minority role tended to conform more frequently than high achievement minority students—especially when amongst a high achievement majority. In addition, low achievement females showed more frequent conformity than low achievement males.
- Arkin, R. M. (1981). Self-Presentation Style. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research (pp. 311-333). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-685180-9.50020-8
- Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of Group Pressure on the Modification and Distortion of Judgements. In H. Guetzknow (Ed.), Groups, Leadership and Men (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.
- Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and Social Pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31-35. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1155-31
- Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of Independence and Conformity: I. A Minority of One against a Unanimous Majority. Psychological Monograph: General and Applied, 70, 1-70. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093718
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Bond, R. (2005). Group Size and Conformity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 331-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205056464
- Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and Conformity: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) Line Judgment Task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111-137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111
- Eagly, A. H., & Chravala, C. (1986). Sex Differences in Conformity: Status and Gender-Role Interpretations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10, 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1986.tb00747.x
- Garry, M., French, L., Kinzett, T., & Mori, K. (2008). Eyewitness Memory Following Discussion: Using the MORI Technique with a Western Sample. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 431-439. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1376
- Hanayama, A., & Mori, K. (2011). Conformity of Six-Year-Old Children in the Asch Experiment without Using Confederates. Psychology, 2, 661-664. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2011.27100
- Hodges, B. H., & Geyer, A. (2006). A Nonconformist Account of the Asch Experiments: Values, Pragmatics, and Moral Dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 2-19. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_1
- Jetten, J., & Hornsey, M. J. (2012). Revisiting Asch’s Line-Judgment Studies. In Social Psychology: Revisiting the Classic Studies (pp. 76-90). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
- Kosten, P. A., Scheier, L. M., & Grenard, J. L. (2013). Latent Class Analysis of Peer Conformity: Who Is Yielding to Pressure and Why? Youth & Society, 45, 565-590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X12454307