Gender, Perpetrator Attractiveness, and Ambivalent Sexism as Predictors of Victim Blaming, Minimization, and Subjective Fear in Stalking Incidents — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Gender, Perpetrator Attractiveness, and Ambivalent Sexism as Predictors of Victim Blaming, Minimization, and Subjective Fear in Stalking Incidents
Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA
,
Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA
,
Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA
,
Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA
,
Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA
,
Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA
1 Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA
2 Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA
3 Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA
4 Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA
5 Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA
6 Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA
The aim of this study was to examine how participant gender affected individuals’ perceptions toward stalking and stalking victims. We also explored how the attractiveness of stalking perpetrators impacted perceptions of stalking along with the role of ambivalent sexism. A total of 120 undergraduate students in the research pool were randomly assigned to read one of two stalking scenarios that either portrayed the perpetrator as attractive or non-attractive. Participants completed related measures of victim blame attribution, stal- king minimization, subjective fear, and ambivalent sexism. We performed a 2 × 2 MANOVA, a follow up ANOVA, and a series of multiple regression analyses to test the hypotheses, which were supported. The results revealed that men were more likely to blame the victim, minimize the stalking incident, and feel less subjective fear for the victim than did women. We found that both hostile sexism and benevolent sexism were significant predictors of blaming the victim. Furthermore, hostile sexism was a significant predictor of minimizing the stalking incident and feeling less subjective fear for the victim. Possible explanations for the results and future research directions are discussed.
Abwender, D. A., & Hough, K. (2001). Interactive Effects of Characteristics of Defendant and Mock Juror on U.S. Participants’ Judgment and Sentencing Recommendations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 603-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600574
Bragg, C. B. (2011). Ambivalent Sexism and Traditional Gender Roles as Predictors of Performance Evaluation Bias. Master’s Thesis, Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Basile, K. C., Walters, M. L., Chen, J., & Merrick, M. T. (2014). Prevalence and Characteristics of Sexual Violence, Stalking, and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization—National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. American Journal of Public Health, 63, 1-18.
Bridges, J. S. (1991). Perceptions of Date and Stranger Rape: A Difference in Sex Role Expectations and Rape-Supportive Beliefs. Sex Roles, 24, 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288303
Bureau of Justice Statistics (2009). Stalking Victimization in the United States. National Crime Victimization Survey. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/ovw/legacy/2012/08/15/bjs-stalking-rpt.pdf
Cannon, A. (2012). Examining the Role of Defendant Attractiveness on Juror Decisions for Crimes Relating to Stalking, Burglary, and Murder. Undergraduate Project, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester Metropolitan University’s Research Repository.
Cassese, E. C., & Holman, M. R. (2019). Playing the Woman Card: Ambivalent Sexism in the 2016 US Presidential Race. Political Psychology, 40, 55-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12492
Catalano, S. (2012). Stalking Victims in the United States—Revised. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/svus_rev.pdf
Chan, H. C. O., & Sheridan, L. (2017). Is This Stalking? Perceptions of Stalking Behavior among Young Male and Female Adults in Hong Kong and Mainland China. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35, 3710-3734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517711180
Christian, M., Safari, O., Ramazani, P., Burnham, G., & Glass, N. (2011). Sexual and Gender Based Violence against Men in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Effects on Survivors, Their Families and the Community. Medicine, Conflict and Survival, 27, 227-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13623699.2011.645144
Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insidious Dangers of Benevolent Sexism: Consequences for Women’s Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764-779. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.764
Davis, K. E., Frieze, I. H., & Maiuro, R. D. (2001). Stalking: Perspectives on Victims and Perpetrators. Berlin: Springer Publishing.
Dunlap, E. E. (2010). Stalking Myth Acceptance: An Investigation of Attitudinal Constructs Associated with Gender Differences in Judgments of Intimate Stalking. Doctoral Dissertation, Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky.
Dunlap, E. E., Hodell, E. C., Golding, J. M., & Wasarhaley, N. E. (2012). Mock Jurors’ perception of Stalking: The Impact of Gender and Expressed Fear. Sex Roles, 66, 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9970-z
Dunlap, E. E., Lynch, K. R., Jewell, J. A., Wasarhaley, N. E., & Golding, J. M. (2015). Participant Gender, Stalking Myth Acceptance, and Gender Role Stereotyping in Perceptions of Intimate Partner Stalking: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21, 234-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.951648
Englebrecht, C. M., & Reyns, B. W. (2011). Gender Differences in Acknowledgment of Stalking Victimization: Results from the NCVS Stalking Supplement. Violence and Victims, 26, 560-579. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.26.5.560
Finnegan, H. A., & Timmons Fritz, P. A. (2012). Differential Effects of Gender on Perceptions of Stalking and Harassment Behavior. Violence and Victims, 27, 895-910. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.27.6.895
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
Hall, D. M. (1998). The Victims of Stalking. In J. R. Maloy (Ed.), The Psychology of Stalking (pp. 113-137). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012490560-3/50025-6
Haugaard, J. J., & Seri, L. G. (2003). Stalking and Other Forms of Intrusive Contact after the Dissolution of Adolescent Dating or Romantic Relationships. Violence and Victims, 18, 279-297. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.2003.18.3.279
Hellmer, K., Stenson, J. T., & Jylh?, K. M. (2018). What’s (Not) Underpinning Ambivalent Sexism? Revisiting the Roles of Ideology, Religiosity, Personality, Demographics, and Men’s Facial Hair in Explaining Hostile and Benevolent Sexism. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.001
Klaczynski, P. A., Goold, K. W., & Mudry, J. J. (2004). Culture, Obesity Stereotypes, Self-Esteem, and the “Thin Ideal”: A Social Identity Perspective. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 307-317. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOYO.0000032639.71472.19
Klein, A., Salomon, A., Huntington, N., Dubois, J., & Lang, D. (2009). Statewide Study of Stalking and Its Criminal Justice Response. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/228354.pdf https://doi.org/10.1037/e619592009-001
Lambert, E. G., Smith, B., Geistman, J., Cluse-Tolar, T., & Jiang, S. (2013). Do Men and Women Differ in Their Perceptions of Stalking: An Exploratory Study among College Students. Violence and Victims, 28, 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.09-201
Legal Information Institute (n.d.). Chapter 110A. Domestic Violence and Stalking: Section 2261. Stalking. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2261A
Linos, N. (2009). Rethinking Gender-Based Violence during War: Is Violence against Civilian Men a Problem Worth Addressing? Social Science and Medicine, 68, 1548-1551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.02.001
Magyarics, C. L., Lynch, K. R., Golding, J. M., & Lippert, A. (2015). The Impact of Frequency of Behavior and Type of Contact on Judgments Involving a Criminal Stalking Case. Law and Human Behavior, 39, 602-613. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000151
McKeon, B., McEwan, T. E., & Luebbers, S. (2015). “It’s Not Really Stalking If You Know the Person”: Measuring Community Attitudes That Normalize, Justify and Minimise Stalking. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22, 291-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2014.945637
Miglietta, A., & Maran, D. A. (2017). Gender, Sexism and the Social Representation of Stalking: What Makes the Difference? Psychology of Violence, 7, 563-573. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000070
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (2003). Costs of Intimate Partner Violence against Women in the United States. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pub/IPV_cost.html
Ngo, F. T., & Paternoster, R. (2013). Stalking, Gender and Coping: A Partial Test of Broidy and Agnew’s Gender/General Strain Theory Hypothesis. Victims and Offenders, 8, 94-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2012.749122
Oswald, D. L., Baalbaki, M., & Kirkman, M. (2019). Experiences with Benevolent Sexism: Scale Development and Associations with Women’s Well-Being. Sex Roles, 80, 362-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0933-5
Owens, J. G. (2016). Why Definitions Matter: Stalking Victimization in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 2196-2226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515573577
Owens, J. G. (2017). A Gender-Biased Definition: Unintended Impacts of the Fear Requirement in Stalking Victimization. Crime & Delinquency, 63, 1339-1362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128715615883
Phillips, L., Quirk, R., Rosenfeld, B., & O’Connor, M. (2004). Is It Stalking? Perceptions of Stalking among College Undergraduates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 73-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854803259251
Powell, A., & Webster, K. (2018). Cultures of Gendered Violence: An Integrative Review of Measures of Attitudinal Support for Violence against Women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 51, 40-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865816675669
Powroznik, K. M. (2016). Healthism and Weight-Based Discrimination. Work and Occupations, 44, 139-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888416682576
Puhl, R. M., Schwartz, M. B., & Brownell, K. D. (2005). Impact of Perceived Consensus on Stereotypes about Obese People: A New Approach for Reducing Bias. Health Psychology, 24, 517-525. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.5.517
Purcell, R., Pathé, M., & Mullen, P. E. (2001). A Study of Women Who Stalk. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 2056-2060. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.12.2056
Robertson, N., & Vohora, R. (2008). Fitness vs. Fatness: Implicit Bias towards Obesity among Fitness Professionals and Regular Exercisers. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 547-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.06.002
Schell, B. H., & Lanteigne, N. M. (2000). Stalking, Harassment, and Murder in the Work-place: Guidelines for Protection and Prevention. Quorum Books.
Scott, A. J., Duff, S. C., Sheridan, L., & Rajakaruna, N. (2018). The Influence of Contextual Information Regarding the Breakdown of Relationships and Perpetrator-Target Sex Composition on Perceptions of Relational Stalking. Psychology, Crime & Law, 25, 364-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1529231
Scott, A. J., Rajakaruna, N., Sheridan, L., & Gavin, J. (2015). International Perceptions of Relational Stalking: The Influence of Prior Relationship, Perpetrator Sex, Target Sex, and Participant Sex. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 3308-3323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514555012
Sheridan, L., & Lyndon, A. E. (2012). The Influence of Prior Relationship, Gender, and Fear on the Consequences of Stalking Victimization. Sex Roles, 66, 340-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9889-9
Sheridan, L., & Scott, A. J. (2010). Perceptions of Harm: Verbal versus Physical Abuse in Stalking Scenarios. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 400-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809359743
Simonson, K., & Subich, L. M. (1999). Rape Perceptions as a Function of Gender-Role Traditionality and Victim-Perpetrator Association. Sex Roles, 40, 617-634. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018844231555
Sinclair, H. C. (2012). Stalking Myth-Attributions: Examining the Role of Individual and Contextual Variables on Attributions in Unwanted Pursuit Scenarios. Sex Roles, 66, 378-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9853-8
Smith, S. G., Zhang, X., Basile, K. C., Merrick, M. T., Wang, J., Kresnow, M., & Chen, J. (2015). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2015 Data Brief— Updated Release. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/2015data-brief508.pdf
Spitzberg, B. H. (2017). Acknowledgment of Unwanted Pursuit, Threats, Assault, and Stalking in a College Population. Psychology of Violence, 7, 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040205
Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2014). The Dark Side of Relationship Pursuit: From Attraction to Obsession to Stalking (2nd ed.). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805916
Spitzberg, B. H., Cupach, W. R., & Ciceraro, L. D. L. (2010). Sex Differences in Stalking and Obsessive Relational Intrusion: Two Meta-Analyses. Partner Abuse, 1, 259-285. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.1.3.259
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). The Role of Stalking in Domestic Violence Crime Reports Generated by the Colorado Springs Police Department. Violence and Victims, 15, 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.15.4.427
Wiener, R. L., Hurt, L., Russell, B., Mannen, K., & Gasper, C. (1997). Perceptions of Sexual Harassment: The Effects of Gender, Legal Standard, and Ambivalent Sexism. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024818110678
Wigman, S. A. (2009). Male Victims of Former-Intimate Stalking: A Selected Review. International Journal of Men’s Health, 8, 101-115. https://doi.org/10.3149/jmh.0802.101
Yamawaki, N. (2007). Rape Perception and the Function of Ambivalent Sexism and Gender-Role Traditionality. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 406-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260506297210
Yamawaki, N., & Tschanz, B. T. (2005). Rape Perception Differences between Japanese and American College Students: On the Mediating Influence of Gender Role Traditionality. Sex Roles, 52, 379-392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-2680-7
Yamawaki, N., Darby, R., & Queiroz, A. (2007). The Moderating Role of Ambivalent Sexism: The Influence of Power Status on Perception of Rape Victim and Rapist. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147, 41-56. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.147.1.41-56
Yamawaki, N., Ostenson, J., & Brown, C. R. (2009). The Functions of Gender Role Traditionality, Ambivalent Sexism, Injury, and Frequency of Assault on Domestic Violence Perception: A Study between Japanese and American College Students. Violence against Women, 15, 1126-1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209340758
Yanowitz, K. L., & Yanowitz, J. L. (2012). The Role of Gender in the Generation of Stalking Scripts. Sex Roles, 66, 366-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9867-2