Developmental Changes in Cognitive Bias
- 1 Graduate School of Social and Cultural Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
- 2 Graduate School of Social and Cultural Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
- 3 Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
Abstract
While many studies have investigated incorrect evaluations of cognitive bias type and how age-related decisions are influenced by it, few have compared this phenomenon across different age groups (i.e., adults and children). In this study, we examined developmental changes by comparing the number of correct answers given by children and that given by adults when performing different types of cognitive bias tasks. The participant sample comprised 36 children (21 boys and 15 girls with an average age of 12.3 years) and 26 adults (15 men and 11 women with an average age of 27.3 years). The cognitive bias task created by previous study was modified and then implemented to better understand the performance of the children. This study identified four types of developmental changes in cognitive bias. Consequently, it was suggested that in terms of cognitive reflection, conjunction bias and confirmation bias improved performance, and framing did not change for either children or adults. It was also suggested that the confirmation bias tasks’ lack of consideration for the subcategory of ADHD was associated with performance among both the children and the adults. Results show that some cognitive biases may reveal developmental changes, depending on the category. As such, we were able to consider the factors involved in human decision-making and obtain a perspective on developmental changes to improve future decision-making.
- Blair, C., & Razza, R. (2007). Relating Effortful Control of Executive Function and Understanding of False Belief in Emerging Math and Literacy Ability in Kindergarten. Child Development, 78, 647-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x
- Bruine de Bruin, W. (2012). Judgment and Decision Making in Adolescents. In M. K. Dhami, A. Schlottemann, & M. Waldmann (Eds.), Judgment & Decision Making as a Skill: Learning, Development, & Evolution (pp. 85-112). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139015684.008
- Carstensen, L. L., Mikels, J. A., & Mather, M. (2006). Aging and the Intersection of Cognition, Motivation, and Emotion. In J. Birren, & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (pp. 343-362). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B9-78-012101-2/64950-0185
- Fischhoff, B. (2008). Assessing Adolescent Decision-Making Competence. Development Review, 28, 12-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.001
- Gogtay, N., Giedd, J. N., Lusk, L., Hayashi, K. M., Greenstein, D., Vaituzis, A. C., & Toga, A. W. (2004). Dynamic Mapping of Human Cortical Development during Childhood through Early Adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 101, 8174-8179. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402680101
- Hertwig, R. N., & Gigerenzer, G. (1999). The “Conjunction Fallacy” Revisited: How Intelligent Inferences Look Like Reasoning Errors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 275-305. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199912)12:4 3.0.CO;2-M
- Hertwig, R. N., Zangerl, M. A., Biedert, E., & Margraf, J. (2008). The Public’s Probabilistic Numeracy: How Tasks, Education and Exposure to Games of Chance Shape It. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 457-470. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.611
- Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809477
- Levin, I. P., & Hart, S. S. (2003). Risk Preferences in Young Children: Early Evidence of Individual Differences in Reaction to Potential Gains and Losses. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 397-414. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.453
- Matsuura, T. (2006). Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Study on the Actual State of Probability Judgment of Children. Japan Academic Society of Mathematics Education, 12, 141-151.
- Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, S. (2000). The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe’’ Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734