Oedipus’s Depths
- 1 International Society of Multidisciplinary Psychoanalysis, Geneva, Switzerland
- 2 International Society of Multidisciplinary Psychoanalysis, Geneva, Switzerland
- 3 Seoul National University (Bundang Hospital), Seoul, Republic of Korea
Abstract
In this paper, we discuss the connections between the myths of Oedipus and Narcissus. First, we propose that Narcissus is pre-existent to Oedipus in the child’s development, and it represents its first defense against an unknown and terrifying world. Next, we argue that Oedipus’s complex comes after, but that in its “depths,” we can still find the vestigial remains of the original narcissism with its polar extremes of love and loath for oneself, or rather, as we explain, for one’s image. In our exploration of Oedipus’s foundations, we consider Melanie Klein’s objectual relation to the mother and the concept of Fundamental Violence developed by Bergeret. Finally, in an attempt to move back even past this stage, we consider the theory of Bleger on the symbiotic relationship between the newborn and the world around him. We conclude by proposing Oedipus and Narcissus as the two polarities of the same archetype of development, one being the unbridled vital instinct and the other the acceptance of reality with its norms, laws, and obligations.
- Abraham, G. (1994). Private Communication.
- Bergeret, J. (1984). La violence fondamentale. Dunod.
- Bleger, J. (1985). Symbiose et ambiguïté. étude psychanalytique. PUF.
- De Sade, M. (1791). Justine (or The Misfortunes of Virtue). Global Grey. https://www.globalgreyebooks.com/justine-ebook.html
- Ferré, L., & Liégeois, J.-P. (2013). Le désordre, c’est l’ordre moins le pouvoir: Mots d’amour et autres provocations. Cherche Midi.
- Freléchoz, T. (2020, October 10). OEdipe revisités par Narcisse. Société Internationale de Psychanalyse Multidisciplinaire, Genève. http://www.sipsym.com/index.php/formation/formation-2020
- Freud, E. L. (1960). Letters of Sigmund Freud. Basic Books.
- Freud, S. (1905). Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality: The 1905 Edition. Verso.
- Freud, S. (1913). Sigmund Totem and Taboo. WW Norton.
- Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the Pleasure Principle. In On Metapsychology (pp. 205-270). Middlesex.
- Freud, S. (1937). Moses and Monotheism. Martino Fine Books.
- Haeckel, H. (1866). Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. von Georg Reimer.
- Heller, J. (2004). Catch-22 (1st Simon & Schuster pbk. ed). Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
- Klein, M. (2018). The Oedipus Complex in the Light of Early Anxieties (1945). In J. Steiner (Ed.), The Oedipus Complex Today (1st ed., pp. 11-82). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429482601-2
- Lehotkay, R. (2020). C’est quoi le diagnostic? European Journal of Intellectual Disability, 14, 1-17. https://ejid.name/files/664/lehotkay-c-est-quoi-le-diagnostic-vf-04-09-20.pdf
- Press, J. (2010). La construction du sens. Presses Le fil rouge, Universitaires de France. https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.pres.2010.01
- Saïd, C. (2011). Le père mythique-ment, une construction freudienne. Analyse Freudienne Presse, 1, 175-186. https://doi.org/10.3917/afp.018.0175
- Spielrein, S. (1944). Destruction as the Cause of Coming into Being. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 39, 155-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1994.00155.x
- Winnicott, D. W. (1960). The Theory of the Parent-Infant Relationship. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 41, 585-595.