The purpose of this brief experimental analysis was to examine the effect of changes in visual stimuli, contingent reinforcement, and/or performance feedback on oral reading fluency skills of seven students at-risk of reading failure in second and third grade. Specifically, the current study examined how font size, contingent reinforcement, performance feedback, and combination of font size, contingent reinforcement, and performance feedback affect readability and ultimately, students’ reading fluency performance. For six participants, adding the element of performance feedback or adding the elements of both performance feedback and contingent reinforcement increased their words correct per minute (WCPM). For five participants, adding the element of contingent reinforcement to either the standard size print or enlarged print condition increased their WCPM. The enlarged print size alone condition only increased the WCPM for two participants; however, when enlarged print was combined with performance feedback or both performance feedback and contingent reinforcement, six participants demonstrated improved WCPM compared to the standard size print condition. These results suggest that combining stimulus change with consequences may improve oral reading fluency skills of students at-risk of reading failure.
Alber-Morgan, S. R., Ramp, E. M., Anderson, L. L., & Martin, C. M. (2007). Effects of Repeated Readings, Error Correction, and Performance Feedback on the Fluency and Comprehension of Middle School Students with Behavior Problems. Journal of Special Education, 41, 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070410010201
Atiigan, N., Xiong, Y. Z., & Legge, G. E. (2020). Reconciling Print-Size and Display-Size Constraints on Reading. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117, 30276-30284. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2007514117
Baddley, A. D., Emslie, H., & Nimmo-Smith, M. I. (1992). The Speed and Capacity of Language Processing Task: SCOLP. Thames Valley Test Company.
Bailey, I. L., Lueck, A. H., Greer, R. B., Tuan, K. M., Bailey, V. M., & Dornbusch, H. G. (2003). Understanding the Relationships between Print Size and Reading in Low Vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0309700602
Bookbinder, G. E., Vincent, D., & Crumpler, M. (2002). Salford Sentence Reading Test (Revised). Hodder Education.
Breaux, K. L. (2009). WIAT-III Technical Manual. Pearson.
Cartwright, C. A., & Cartwright, G. P. (1970). Determining the Motivational Systems of Individual Children. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 2, 143-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005997000200311
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge Academic.
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied Behavior Analysis (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Daly III, E. J., Andersen, M., Gortmaker, V., & Turner, A. (2006). Using Experimental Analysis to Identify Reading Fluency Interventions: Connecting the Dots. The Behavior Analysis Today, 7, 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100147
Dewey, E. N., Powell-Smith, K. A., Good III, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2015). Acadience Reading K-6 Technical Adequacy Brief. Acadience Learning. https://acadiencelearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Acadience_Reading_Technical_Adequacy_Brief.pdf
Eckert, T. L., Ardoin, S. P., Daly, E. J., & Martins, B. K. (2002). Improving Oral Reading Fluency: A Brief Experimental Analysis of Intervention with Consequences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 271-281. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2002.35-271
Eckert, T. L., Dunn, E. K., & Ardoin, S. P. (2006). The Effects of Alternate Forms of Performance Feedback on Elementary-Aged Students’ Oral Reading Fluency. Journal of Behavioral Education, 15, 148-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-006-9018-6
Feely, M., Rubin, G. S., Ekstrom, K., & Perera, S. (2005). Investigation into Font Characteristics for Optimum Reading Fluency in Readers with Sight Word Problems. International Congress Series, 1282, 530-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.05.121
Gable, R. A. (1991). Forced-Choice Reinforcement Menu. https://pbisworld.com/wp-content/uploads/Forced-Choice-Reinforcement-Menu.pdf
Good III, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., Cummings, K., Dufour-Martel, C., Petersen, K., Powell-Smith, K. A., Stollar, S., & Wallin, J. (2011a). Acadience Reading K-6 Assessment Manual. Acadience Learning, Inc. https://acadiencelearning.org/wp
Good III, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., Cummings, K., Dufour-Martel, C., Petersen, K., Powell-Smith, K. A., Stollar, S., & Wallin, J. (2011b). Acadience Reading Oral Reading Fluency Student Materials. Acadience Learning, Inc. https://acadiencelearning.org/acadience-reading-materials-download
Good III, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., Cummings, K., Dufour-Martel, C., Petersen, K., Powell-Smith, K. A., Stollar, S., & Wallin, J. (2011c). Acadience Reading Oral Reading Fluency Student Materials: Large Print. Dynamic Measurement Group, Inc. https://acadiencelearning.org/acadience-reading-materials-download/content/uploads/2020/08/AcadienceReading_ALO_Assessment_Manual.pdf
Good III, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., Dewey, E. N., Wallin, J., Powell-Smith, K. A., & Latimer, R. (2019). Acadience Reading K-6 Technical Manual. https://acadiencelearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Acadience_Reading_K-6_Technical_Manual.pdf
Hilsmer, A. S., Wehby, J. H., & Falk, K. B. (2016). Reading Fluency Interventions for Middle School Students with Academic and Behavioral Disabilities. Reading Improvement, 53, 53-64.
Hosp, M. K., Hosp, J. L., & Howell, K. W. (2007). The ABCs of CBM: A Practical Guide to Curriculum-Based Measurement. Guilford Press.
Koenig, A. J., & Ross, D. B. (1991). A Procedure to Evaluate the Relative Effectiveness of Reading in Large and Regular Print. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 85, 198-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X9108500503
Lueck, A. H., Bailey, I. L., Greer, R. B., Tuan, K. M., Bailey, V. M., & Dornbusch, H. G. (2003). Exploring Print-Size Requirements and Reading for Students with Low Vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 335-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0309700603
Maughan, B., & Carroll, J. (2006). Literacy and Mental Disorders. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 4, 350-354. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.yco.0000228752.79990.41
O’Brien, B. A., Mansfield, S. J., & Legge, G. E. (2005). The Effect of Print Size on Reading Speed in Dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 332-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2005.00273.x
Panagiotis D., Gardelis, J., Ventouri, K., Nikolaou, K., Koltsida, G., Tsitoura, S., & Constantopoulos, A. (2008). Behavior Problems in Children with Learning Difficulties According to Their Parents and Teachers. Pediatrics, 121, S100. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-2022CC
Pennsylvania Department of Education (2020). Special Education Data Reporting. https://penndata.hbg.psu.edu/Public-Reporting/Data-at-a-Glance
Pennsylvania Department of Education (2021). Public School Enrollments 2020-2021. https://www.education.pa.gov/DataAndReporting/Enrollment/Pages/PublicSchEnrReports.aspx
Petursdottir, A. L., McMaster, K., McComas, J. J., Bradfield, T., Braganza, V., Koch-McDonald, J., Rodriguez, R., & Scharf, H. (2009). Brief Experimental Analysis of Early Reading Interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 4, 215-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.02.003
Tracy, S. J. (2019). Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Ujima, K. (2010). Selecting a Print Size Suitable for Readers with Low Vision. Japanese Journal of Special Education, 48, 323-331. https://doi.org/10.6033/tokkyou.48.323
Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (3rd ed.). Psychological Corporation.
Wilkins, A., Cleave, R., Grayson, N., & Wilson, L. (2009). Typography for Children May Be Inappropriately Designed. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 402-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01402.x