Introduction: The study’s objective is to explore the common behavior of the participants in four slow open groups taking part in a Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) skills training. The experiment population consisted of two groups of adolescents and two of some of their parents or legal guardians. We compared the groups via their answers to the “absurd questionnaire” during the training sessions. Methods: the participants had to select one image in each of 50 pairs in a questionnaire (“absurd questionnaire”). In this experiment, we were able to administer a version of the questionnaire to the participants before forming the groups. We analyzed the differences between the four groups, considering their initial picture choices and how these evolved, the changes in the choices, the flux, and the answers’ focus. Results: The presence of a questionnaire administered before the group experience allows us to distinguish between socio-cultural orientation and group effects. A strong orientation precedes the group formation, is partially lost during the group activity and is eventually recovered at the end of the group work. In addition, there are apparent similarities between the same age groups (parents and adolescents), while family ties seem to play a lesser role in shaping the group’s behavior. Conclusions: The slow-open setting appears to render the groups more susceptible to the external environment. While we can observe the formation of a group identity distinguishable from the “clan loyalty” via a decrease in the initial orientation, this is short-lived, and the external environment asserts its eventual dominance. Family ties are less effective than generational kinship in shaping the groups’ behavior.
KeywordsDialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)Group Dynamics in Young and ParentsSlow Open Group WorkGroup AnalysisPsychophysicsUnconscious Entanglement
Aspect, A., Grangier, P., & Roger, G. (1982). Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedanken Experiment: A New Violation of Bell’s Inequalities. Physical Review Letters, 49, 91-94. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91
Atmanspacher, H. (2004). Quantum Approaches to Consciousness. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-consciousness
Baaquie, B. E., & Martin, F. (2005). Quantum Psyche—Quantum Field Theory of the Human Psyche. NeuroQuantology, 3, 7-42. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2005.3.1.57
Beck, F., & Eccles, J. (1992). Quantum Aspects of Brain Activity and the Role of Consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89, 11357-11361. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.23.11357
Bell, J. (1964). On the Einstein-Poldolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physics Physique Fizika, 1, 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195
Bell, J. (1966). On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 38, 447-452. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.38.447
Bion, W. (1961). Experiences in Groups and Other Papers. Tavistock Publications Ltd.
Bohr, N. (1935). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 48, 969-702. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.48.696
Cerf, N., & Adami, C. (1997). Quantum Mechanics of Measurement. ArXiv:Quant-Ph/ 9605002v2.
Cerf, N., & Adami, C. (1998). What Information Theory Can Tell Us about Quantum Reality. arXiv:quant-ph/9806047v1
Conte, E., Todarello, O., Federici, A., Vitiello, F., Lopane, M., & Khrennikov, A. (2003). A Preliminary Evidence of Quantum Like Behavior in Measurement of Mental State. arXiv:quant-ph/0307201v1
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 47, 777-780. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777
Fernandez-Rivas, A., Sesma-Pardo, E., Kerexeta, I., Diaz-Cosgaya, A., Vivanco, E., Carminati, F., Torres, M. A. G., Fouassier, C., Martin, F., Demongeot, J., & Carminati, G. G. (2020). Group Therapy for Adolescents and Parents: Study of Unconscious Orientation. NeuroQuantology, 18, 70-82. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2020.18.7.NQ20195
Fernandez-Rivas, A., Sesma-Pardo, E., Kerexeta, I., Diaz-Cosgaya, A., Vivanco, E., Carminati, F., Torres, M. A. G., Fouassier, C., Martin, F., Demongeot, J., & Carminati, G. G. (2021a). Erratum to “Slow Open Dialectical Behavior Group Therapy for Adolescents and Parents: Longitudinal Study of Unconscious Orientation” [Psychology 12 (2021) 756-784]. Psychology, 12, 1615-1641. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2021.1210100
Fernandez-Rivas, A., Sesma-Pardo, E., Kerexeta, I., Diaz-Cosgaya, A., Vivanco, E., Carminati, F., Torres, M. A. G., Fouassier, C., Martin, F., Demongeot, J., & Carminati, G. G. (2021b). Slow Open Dialectical Behavior Group Therapy for Adolescents and Parents: Longitudinal Study of Unconscious Orientation. Psychology, 12, 756-784. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2021.125047
Foulkes, S. H. (1964). Therapeutic Group Analysis. International Universities Press.
Freeman, W., & Vitiello, G. (2016). Matter and Mind Are Entangled in Two Streams of Images Guiding Behavior and Informing the Subject Through Awareness. Mind and Matter, 14, 7-24.
Galli Carminati, G., & Carminati, F. (2006). The Mechanism of Mourning: An Anti-Entropic Mechanism. NeuroQuantology, 4, 186-197. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2006.4.2.97
Galli Carminati, G., & Martin, F. (2008). Quantum Mechanics and the Psyche. Physics of Particles and Nuclei, 39, 560-577. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779608040047
Galli Carminati, G., Martin, F., & Carminati, F. (2017). A Very Simple Quantum Model of Mind and Matter. NeuroQuantology, 15, 186-199. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2017.15.2.1031
Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J., Delaflor, M., Attie, L., & Goswami, A. (1994). The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox in the Brain: The Transferred Potential. Physics Essays, 7, 422-428.
Hamer, R. M., & Simpson, P. M. (2009). Last Observation Carried Forward Versus Mixed Models in the Analysis of Psychiatric Clinical Trials. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 639-641. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09040458
Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (1996). Conscious Events as Orchestrated Spacetime Selections. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3, 36-53.
Jung, C. G. (1952). Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400839162
Jung, C. G. (1959). The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious (2nd ed., Vol. 9). Princeton University Press.
Jung, C. G. (1960). The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche (Nachdr.). Routledge.
Jung, C. G. (1962). Memories and Dreams, Reflections. Vintage Editions.
Jung, C. G., & Hull, R. F. C. (1911). Symbols of Transformation: An Analysis of the Prelude to a Case of Schizophrenia. Princeton University Press.
Jung, C. G., Pauli, W., & Meyer, C. A. (2001). Atom and Archetype: The Pauli/Jung Letters 1932-1958 (Traduction française: Correspondance 1932-1958 , ed. Albin Michel, 2000). Princeton University Press.
Kaës, R. (2010). Le sujet, le lien et le groupe. Groupalité psychique et alliances inconscientes. Cahiers de Psychologie Clinique, 1, 13-40. https://doi.org/10.3917/cpc.034.0013
Linehan, M. (1993). Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. Guilford Press.
Linehan, M. (2015). DBT Skills Training Manual (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Marshall, I. (1989). Consciousness and Bose-Einstein Condensates. New Ideas in Psychology, 7, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118X(89)90038-X
Martin, F., & Galli Carminati, G. (2009). Synchronicity, Quantum Mechanics, and Psyche. In H. Atmanspacher, & H. Primas (Eds.), Recasting Reality: Wolfgang Pauli’s Philosophical Ideas and Contemporary Science (pp. 227-243). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85198-1_11
Martin, F., Carminati, F., & Galli Carminati, G. (2009). Synchronicity, Quantum Information and the Psyche. Journal of Cosmology, 3, 580-589.*
Martin, F., Carminati, F., & Galli Carminati, G. (2010). Quantum Information, Oscillations and the Psyche. Physics of Particles and Nuclei, 41, 425-451. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779610030032
Martin, F., Carminati, F., & Galli Carminati, G. (2018). Quantum Information Theory Applied to Unconscious and Consciousness. NeuroQuantology, 16, 16-33. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2013.11.1.628
Miller, A. L., Rathus, J. H., & Linehan, M. (2017). Dialectical Behavior Therapy with Suicidal Adolescents. Guilford Press.
Orlov, Y. F. (1982). The Wave Logic of Consciousness: A Hypothesis. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21, 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01880263
Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the Mind. Oxford University Press.
Penrose, R., & Gardner, M. (1989). The Emperor’s New Mind. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198519737.001.0001
Pitkänen, M. (2010). Quantum Mind in TGD Universe. Journal of Nonlocality, 1, 1-42. https://journals.sfu.ca/jnonlocality/index.php/jnonlocality/article/download/17/17
Richens, J. F., Selby, J. H., & Al-Safi, S. W. (2017). Entanglement Is Necessary for Emergent Classicality in All Physical Theories. Physical Review Letters, 119, Article ID: 080503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.080503
Sabbadini, S., & Vitiello, G. (2019). Entanglement and Phase-Mediated Correlations in Quantum Field Theory. Application to Brain-Mind States. Applied Sciences, 9, Article No. 3203. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9153203
Schrödinger, E. (1935). Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 31, 555-563. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100013554
Schrödinger, E. (1936). Probability Relations between Separated Systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 32, 446-452. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100019137
Trojaola-Zapirain, B., Carminati, F., Fernandez Rivas, M. A., Gonzalez Torres, A., Gonzales de Mendivil, E., Fouassier, C., Martin, F., Demongeot, J., & Galli Carminati, G. (2019). An Update and Generalization of Group Unconscious Orientation in OMIE Group Training for Therapists. NeuroQuantology, 17, 14-30. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2019.17.1.1918
Trojaola-Zapirain, B., Carminati, F., Gonzalez Torres, A., Gonzales de Mendivil, E., Fouassier, C., Gex-Fabry, M., Martin, F., Labarere, J., Demongeot, J., Lorincz, E. N., & Galli Carminati, G. (2014). Group Unconscious Common Orientation: Exploratory Study at the Basque Foundation for the Investigation of Mental Health Group Training for Therapists. NeuroQuantology, 12, 139-150. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2014.12.1.709
Trojaola-Zapirain, B., Carminati, F., Gonzalez Torres, A., Gonzales de Mendivil, E., Fouassier, C., Gex-Fabry, M., Martin, F., Labarere, J., Demongeot, J., Lorincz, E. N., & Galli Carminati, G. (2015). Addendum on Entropy to the Exploratory Study on Group Unconscious at the Basque Foundation for the Investigation of Mental Health Group Training for Therapists. NeuroQuantology, 13, 49-56. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2015.13.1.780
Trojaola-Zapirain, B., Carminati, F., Gonzalez Torres, A., Gonzales de Mendivil, E., Fouassier, C., Gex-Fabry, M., Martin, F., Labarere, J., Demongeot, J., Lorincz, E. N., & Galli Carminati, G. (2016). A Comparison of the Evolution and Entropy of Responses to Picture Choices on an “Absurdum Questionnaire” between Members of Two Different Training Groups. NeuroQuantology, 14, 501-513. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2016.14.3.919
Vergopoulos, T. (1983). La sensibilisation à la dynamique de groupe d’aprés W. R. Bion et S.H. Foulkes. Médecine et Hygiène, 1, 3149-3155.
Vitiello, G. (2003). Quantum Dissipation and Information: A Route to Consciousness Modelling. NeuroQuantology, 1, 266-279. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2003.1.2.15
Zanello, A., Rouget-Weber, B., Gex Fabry, M. G., Maercker, A., & Guimon, J. (2004). New Instrument to Assess Social Functioning in Mental Health Settings. European Journal of Psychiatry, 18, 76-78.
Zurek, H. (1981). Pointer Basis of Quantum Apparatus: Into What Mixture Does the Wave Packet Collapse? Physical Review D, 24, 1516-1525. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.24.1516