Research in adults has shown that performance is not veridical when participants have to set two bars parallel to each other haptically. It is hypothesized that this is due to the influence of the egocentric reference frame. In addition, larger deviations have been observed for oblique orientations compared to cardinal orientations and for female participants compared to male participants. So far, haptic parallelity performance in children has not been studied in detail. To close this gap the current study compared parallelity matching in children and adults, to address the question if the influence of the egocentric reference frame is the same in children and adults. The study included 120 participants, a group of 80 children, aged 9 to 11 years, and a group of 40 adults. In each group, half of the participants were male, the other half female. Blindfolded participants were instructed to make two bars, which were set in different orientations, haptically parallel to each other. They had to parallel the orientation of a reference bar which was felt with their non-dominant hand, at a test bar, that was rotated with their dominant hand. The bars were presented in the mid-horizontal plane at a distance that was set at twice the length of the arm of the participant. The dependent variable was the difference between the orientation of the reference bar and the test bar. The results showed similar deviations for children and adults. In both groups, a significant oblique and gender effect was found, although these effects were more pronounced in the adult group. These results suggest that children aged 9 to 11 years use the same reference frames as adults when paralleling two bars haptically.
Annett, M. (2004). Hand Preference Observed in Large Healthy Samples: Classification, Norms and Interpretations of Increased Non-Right-Handedness by the Right Shift Theory. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 339-353. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126041528130
Baud-Bovy, G., & Gentaz, E. (2012). The Perception and Representation of Orientations: A Study in the Haptic Modality. Acta Psychologica, 141, 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.06.002
Berenbaum, S. A., & Beltz, A. M. (2011). Sexual Differentiation of Human Behavior: Effects of Prenatal and Pubertal Organizational Hormones. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 32, 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2011.03.001
Davison, K. K., & Susman, E. J. (2001). Are Hormone Levels and Cognitive Ability Related during Early Adolescence? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 416-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/016502501316934842
Fernández-Díaz, M., & Travieso, D. (2011). Performance in Haptic Geometrical Matching Tasks Depends on Movement and Position of the Arm. Acta Psychologica, 136, 382-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.003
Gentaz, E., & Hatwell, Y. (1995). The Haptic ‘Oblique Effect’ in Children’s and Adults’ Perception of Orientation. Perception, 24, 631-646. https://doi.org/10.1068/p240631
Gentaz, E., Badan, M., Luyat, M., & Touil, N. (2002). The Manual Haptic Perception of Orientations and the Oblique Effect in Patients with Left Visuo-Spatial Neglect. Neuroreport, 13, 327-331. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200203040-00016
Gentaz, E., Baud-Bovy, G., & Luyat, M. (2008). The Haptic Perception of Spatial Orientations. Experimental Brain Research, 187, Article No. 331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1382-0
Hassler, M. (1991). Maturation Rate and Spatial, Verbal and Musical Abilities: A Seven-Year-Longitudinal Study. International Journal of Neuroscience, 58, 183-198. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207459108985434
Hermens, F., Kappers, A. M. L., & Gielen, S. C. A. M. (2006). The Structure of Frontoparallel Haptic Space Is Task Dependent. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 62-75. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193656
Kaas, A. L., & Van Mier, H. I. (2006). Haptic Spatial Matching in Near Peripersonal Space. Experimental Brain Research, 170, 403-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0223-7
Kappers, A. M. L. (1999). Large Systematic Deviations in the Haptic Perception of Parallelity. Perception, 28, 1001-1012. https://doi.org/10.1068/p281001
Kappers, A. M. L. (2002). Haptic Perception of Parallelity in the Midsagittal Plane. Acta Psychologica, 109, 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00047-6
Kappers, A. M. L. (2003). Large Systematic Deviations in a Bimanual Parallelity Task: Further Analysis of Contributing Factors. Acta Psychologica, 114, 131-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(03)00063-5
Kappers, A. M. L. (2004). The Contributions of Egocentric and Allocentric Reference Frames in Haptic Spatial Tasks. Acta Psychologica, 117, 333-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.08.002
Kappers, A. M. L. (2007). Haptic Space Processing—Allocentric and Egocentric Reference Frames. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 208-218. https://doi.org/10.1037/cjep2007022
Kappers, A. M. L., & Koenderink, J. J. (1999). Haptic Perception of Spatial Relations. Perception, 28, 781-795. https://doi.org/10.1068/p2930
Kappers, A. M. L., & Schakel, W. B. (2011). Comparison of the Haptic and Visual Deviations in a Parallelity Task. Experimental Brain Research, 208, 467-473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2500-3
Kappers, A. M. L., & Viergever, R. F. (2006). Hand Orientation Is Insufficiently Compensated for in Haptic Spatial Perception. Experimental Brain Research, 173, 407-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0377-y
Kappers, A. M. L., Postma, A., & Viergever, R. F. (2008). How Robust Are the Deviations in Haptic Parallelity? Acta Psychologica, 128, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.09.006
Lechelt, E. C., & Verenka, A. (1980). Spatial Anisotropy in Intramodal and Cross Modal Judgements of Stimulus Orientations: The Stability of the Oblique Effect. Perception, 9, 581-589. https://doi.org/10.1068/p090581
Liben, L. S., Susman, E. J., Finkelstein, J. W., Chinchilli, V. M., Kunselman, S., Schwab, J., Semon Dubas, J., Demers, L. M., Lookingbill, G., D’Arcangelo, M. R., Krogh, H. R., & Kulin, H. E. (2002). The Effects of Sex Steroids on Spatial Performance: A Review and an Experimental Clinical Investigation. Developmental Psychology, 38, 236-253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.2.236
Luyat, M., & Gentaz, E. (2002). Body Tilt Effect on the Reproduction of Orientations: Studies on the Visual Oblique Effect and Subjective Orientations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1002-1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.28.4.1002
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1992). Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Oxford Psychologists Press.
Spencer, J. P., Simmering, V. R., & Schutte A. R. (2006). Toward A Formal Theory of Flexible Spatial Behavior: Geometric Category Biases Generalize Across Pointing and Verbal Response Types. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.473
Van Mier, H. I. (2013). Effects of Visual Information Regarding Allocentric Processing in Haptic Parallelity Matching. Acta Psychologica, 144, 352-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.003
Van Mier, H. I. (2014). Haptic Perception of Parallelity. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 212-221. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20140306.16
Van Mier, H. I. (2016). Reducing the Motor Response in Haptic Parallel Matching Eliminates the Typically Observed Gender Difference. Experimental Brain Research, 234, 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4437-z
Van Mier, H. I. (2019). Changing the Influence of the Egocentric Reference Frame Impacts Deviations in Haptic Parallelity Matching. Experimental Brain Research, 237, 2387-2395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05596-x
Van Mier, H. I. (2020). Combining Visual and Haptic Practice Significantly Reduced Deviations in Haptic Parallelity Matching. Acta Psychologica, 203, Article ID: 103008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103008
Van Mier, H. I. (2021). Gender Differences in Haptic Parallelity Matching. Psychology, 12, 607-623. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2021.124038
Van Mier, H. I., & Jiao, H. (2020). Influence of Action Video Gaming on Spatial Representation in the Haptic Modality. Experimental Brain Research, 238, 2769-2781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05931-7
Volcic, R., Kappers, A. M. L., & Koenderink, J. J. (2007). Haptic Parallelity Perception on the Frontoparallel Plane: The Involvement of Reference Frames. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 276-286. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193749
Volcic, R., Van Rheede, J. J., Postma, A., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2008). Differential Effects of Non-Informative Vision and Visual Interference on Haptic Spatial Processing. Experimental Brain Research, 190, Article No. 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1447-0
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of Sex Differences in Spatial Abilities: A Meta-Analysis and Consideration of Critical Variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250-270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250
Zuidhoek, S., Kappers, A. M. L., & Postma, A. (2007). Haptic Orientation Perception: Sex Differences and Lateralization of Functions. Neuropsychologia, 45, 332-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.032
Zuidhoek, S., Kappers, A. M. L., Van Der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Postma, A. (2003). Delay Improves Performance on a Haptic Spatial Matching Task. Experimental Brain Research, 149, 320-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-002-1365-5