The Big Five Facets and the MBTI: The Relationship between the 30 NEO-PI(R) Facets and the Four Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Scores — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
The Big Five Facets and the MBTI: The Relationship between the 30 NEO-PI(R) Facets and the Four Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Scores
Department of Leadership and Organisational Behaviour, Norwegian Business School (BI), Nydalveien, Olso, Norway
1 Department of Leadership and Organisational Behaviour, Norwegian Business School (BI), Nydalveien, Olso, Norway
This study looked at the relationship between two very well-established personality tests at the facet level. Over 9000 adults completed the MBTI and the NEO-PI-R, which measures six facets each of the Big Five personality traits. Correlational analysis suggested very little relationship between test scores, despite issues of shared method variance. At the domain level, results suggested the highest correlations for Neuroticism was TF, for Extraversion EI, for Openness JP and for both Agreeableness and Conscientiousness TF. There were many inconsistencies in the pattern of correlations at the facet level. The study also did not confirm the relationship between the SN scale and Openness which has been found before. Regressions of the Big Five onto the four MBTI scores suggested that all five traits were related to the TF and JP types. Results are discussed in terms of previous studies in this area. Limitations are acknowledged.
KeywordsPersonalityMBTINEO-PI-RBig Five
Arnau, R., Green, B., Rosen, D., Gleaves, D., & Melancon, J. (2003). Are Jungian Preferences Really Categorical? An Empirical Investigation Using Taxometrical Analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 233-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00040-5
Carlson, J. (1985). Recent Assessment of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 356-365. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4904_3
Carlyn, M. (1977). An Assessment of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41, 461-473. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4105_2
Case P., & Phillipson, G. (2004). Astrology, Alchemy and Retro-Organization Theory: An Astro-Genealogical Critique of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator®. Organization, 11, 473-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404044059
Celli, F., & Lepri, B. (2018). Is Big Five Better than MBTI? A personality Computing Challenge using Twitter Data. In Proceedings of the 5th Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC. Torino Academia University Press.
Choi, S. (2021). The Interdependency of the Diction and MBTI Personality Type of Online Users, American Journal of Applied Psychology, 10, 21-26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20211001.14
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
Dawes, R. (2004). Time for a Critical Empirical Investigation of the MBTI. European Business Forum, 18, 88-89.
DeVito, A. J. (1985). Review of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. In J. V. Mitchell (Ed.), Ninth Mental Measurements Yearbook (Vol. 2, pp. 1030-1032). University of Nebraska Press.
Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The Biological Basis of Personality. Thomas.
Furnham, A. (1992). Personality and Learning Style. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 429-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90071-V
Furnham, A. (1996). The Big Five versus the Big Four: The Relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and the NEO-PI Five Factor Model of Personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 303-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00033-5
Furnham, A. (2008). Relationship among Four Big Five Measures of Different Length. Psychological Reports, 102, 312-316. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.102.1.312-316
Furnham, A. (2012a). Learning Styles and Approaches to Learning. In T. Urdan, S. Graham, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA Educational Psychology Handbook (pp. 59-81). American Psychological Association.
Furnham, A. (2012b). Intelligence and Intellectual Styles. In L. F. Zhang, R. J. Sternberg, & S. Rayner (Eds.), Handbook of Intellectual Styles: Preferences in Cognition, Learning, and Thinking (pp. 173-192). Springer Publishing Company, LLC.
Furnham, A. (2018a). Personality and Occupational Success. In V. Zeigler-Hill, & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 537-551). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526451248.n23
Furnham, A. (2018b). The Great Divide: Academic versus Practitioner Criteria for Psychometric Test Choice. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 498-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1488134
Furnham, A. (2020). Myers-Briggs Type Inventory. In V. Zeigler-Hill, & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 3059-3062). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_50
Furnham, A. (2021). Twenty Ways to Assess Personnel. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108953276
Furnham, A. (2022). MBTI and Aberrant Personality Traits: Dark-Side Trait Correlates of the Myers Briggs Type Inventory. Psychology, 13, 805-815. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2022.135054
Furnham, A., & Crump, J. (2014). The Dark Side of the MBTI. Psychology, 5, 166-171. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.52026
Furnham, A., & McClelland, M. (2022). Folk Concepts and Jung: The relationship between the California Personality Inventory (CPI) and the MBTI. Psychology, 13, 829-841. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2022.135056
Furnham, A., & Stringfield, P. (1993). Personality and Occupational Behavior: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Correlates of Managerial Practices in Two Cultures. Human Relations, 46, 827-848. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600703
Furnham, A., Moutafi, J., & Crump, J. (2003). The Relationship between the Revised Neo-Personality Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Social Behavior and Personality, 31, 577-584. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2003.31.6.577
Goetz, M., Jones-Bitton, A., Hewson, J., Khosa, D., Pearl, D., Bakker, D., Lyons, S., & Conlon, C. (2020). An Examination of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Personality, Gender, and Career Interests of Ontario Veterinary College Students. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 47, 430-444. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0418-044r
Klinkosz, W., & Iskra, J. (2010). Examination of the Relations of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Neo-4 Personality Inventory in a Polish Sample. Psychological Reports, 107, 578-586. https://doi.org/10.2466/08.09.PR0.107.5.578-586
Lloyd, J. B. (2012). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® and Mainstream Psychology: Analysis and Evaluation of an Unresolved Hostility. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 33, 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2012.650028
MacDonald, D., Anderson, P., Tsagarakis, C., & Holland, J. (1994). Examination of the Relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Reports, 74, 339-344. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1994.74.1.339
McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (1988). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the Perspective of the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Journal of Personality, 57, 17-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00759.x
Moyle, P., & Hackston, J. (2018). Personality Assessment for Employee Development: Ivory Tower or Real World? Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 507-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1481078
Murray, J. (1990). Review of Research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70, 1187-1202. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1990.70.3c.1187
Myers, I., & McCaulley, M. (1985). Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychologists.
Myers, I., & Myers, P. (1990). Gifts Differing. Consulting Psychologists Press.
Pace, V. L., & Brannick, M. (2010). How Similar Are Personality Scales of the “Same” Construct? A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 669-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.014
Pittenger, D. J. (1993). The Utility of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Review of Educational Research, 63, 467-488. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063004467
Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary Comments Regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57, 210-221. https://doi.org/10.1037/1065-9293.57.3.210
Querk, N. (2000). Essentials of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Assessment. John Wiley.
Randall, K., Isaacson, M., & Ciro, C. (2017). Validity and Reliability of the Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Best Practices in Health Professions Diversity, 10, 1-27.
Renner, W., Bendele, J. M., Alexandrovicz, R., & Deakin, P. (2014). Does the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Measure Anything beyond the NEO Five Factor Inventory? Journal of Psychological Type, 74, 1-10.
Saggino, A., & Kline, P. (1996). The Location of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Personality Factor Space. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 591-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00009-8
Stein, R., & Swan, A. B. (2019). Evaluating the Validity of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Theory: A Teaching Tool and Window into Intuitive Psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13, e12434. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12434
Thompson, B., & Borrello, E. (1986). Construct Validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 14, 745-752. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164486463032
Yang, C., Richard, G., & Durkin, M. (2016). The Association between Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Psychiatry as the Specialty Choice. International Journal of Medical Education, 7, 48-51. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5698.e2cd