Introduction: The work’s purpose is to study the group behavior of the members of six therapeutic groups, two closed and four slow-open, involved in a Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) class. We studied three groups of teenagers and three of their parents or legal guardians. We confronted the groups’ responses to an “absurd questionnaire” submitted during the training, and we concentrated on the entropy of the response. Methods: The research method consists of a questionnaire administered to training attendees. Participants chose one picture in each one of 50 couples (“absurd questionnaire”). In this work, we could propose a questionnaire to each trainee before the first meeting of the groups. We studied the longitudinal evolution of entropy, and we also compared the six groups according to their first picture choices and their evolution, the changes in the choices, the number of changes (flux), and the divergence or convergence toward the initial answer (focus). We have also analyzed the frequency of entropy variation via the Fourier transform. Results: We find the maximum statistical difference between parents’ and adolescents’ closed groups. The entropy trend is steeper in the adolescent closed group. The entropy evolution depends more on the age group (parents or adolescents) in closed and slow-open groups than on the setting. We found an increase in entropy from the beginning to the end of the training in all the groups. Conclusions: The clear outcome of this study is the augmentation in entropy in all the groups regardless of the settings (closed or slow-open) and possibly a similar entropy’s dominant oscillation frequency, that is, the number of complete cycles in the training interval, regardless of the type of group and the training duration.
KeywordsDialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)Group Dynamics in Young and ParentsSlow-Open Group WorkGroup AnalysisPsychophysicsUnconscious EntanglementPauli-Jung HypothesisQuantum Amplification
Aspect, A., Grangier, P., & Roger, G. (1982). Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell’s Inequalities. Physical Review Letters, 49, 91-94. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91
Atmanspacher, H. (2004). Quantum Approaches to Consciousness. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-consciousness
Baaquie, B. E., & Martin, F. (2005). Quantum Psyche—Quantum Field Theory of the Human Psyche. NeuroQuantology, 3, 7-42. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2005.3.1.57
Beck, F., & Eccles, J. (1992). Quantum Aspects of Brain Activity and the Role of Consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 89, 11357-11361. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.23.11357
Bell, J. (1964). On the Einstein-Poldolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics, 1, 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195
Bell, J. (1966). On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 38, 447. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.38.447
Bion, W. (1961). Experiences in Groups and Other Papers. Tavistock Publications Ltd.
Bohr, N. (1935). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 48, 969-702. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.48.696
Cerf, N., & Adami, C. (1997). Quantum Mechanics of Measurement.
Cerf, N., & Adami, C. (1998). What Information Theory Can Tell Us about Quantum Reality.
Conover, W. J. (1999). Practical Nonparametric Statistics (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Conover, W. J., & Iman, R., L. (1979). On Multiple-Comparisons Procedures (Tech. Rep. LA-7677-MS). Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.2172/6057803
Conte, E., Todarello, O., Federici, A., Vitiello, F., Lopane, M., & Khrennikov, A. A. (2003). Preliminary Evidence of Quantum like Behavior in Measurement of Mental State.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Physical Review, 47, 777-780. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777
Fernandez-Rivas, A., Sesma-Pardo, E., Kerexeta, I., Diaz-Cosgaya, A., Vivanco, E., Carminati, F., Torres, M. A. G., Fouassier, C., Martin, F., Demongeot, J., & Carminati, G. G. (2020). Group Therapy for Adolescents and Parents: Study of Unconscious Orientation. NeuroQuantology, 18, 70-82. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2020.18.7.NQ20195
Bion’s Basic Assumptions
Synchronicity
Quantum Entanglement
Fernandez-Rivas, A., Sesma-Pardo, E., Kerexeta, I., Diaz-Cosgaya, A., Vivanco, E., Carminati, F., Torres, M. A. G., Fouassier, C., Martin, F., Demongeot, J., & Carminati, G. G. (2021a). Erratum to “Slow Open Dialectical Behavior Group Therapy for Adolescents and Parents: Longitudinal Study of Unconscious Orientation” [Psychology 12 (2021) 756-784]. Psychology, 12, 1615-1641. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2021.1210100
Fernandez-Rivas, A., Sesma-Pardo, E., Kerexeta, I., Diaz-Cosgaya, A., Vivanco, E., Carminati, F., Torres, M. A. G., Fouassier, C., Martin, F., Demongeot, J., & Carminati, G. G. (2021b). Slow Open Dialectical Behavior Group Therapy for Adolescents and Parents: Longitudinal Study of Unconscious Orientation. Psychology, 12, 756-784. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2021.125047
Foulkes, S. H. (1964). Therapeutic Group Analysis. International Universities Press.
Freeman, W., & Vitiello, G. (2016). Matter and Mind Are Entangled in Two Streams of Images Guiding Behavior and Informing the Subject through Awareness. Mind and Matter, 14, 7-24.
Galli Carminati, G., & Carminati, F. (2006). The Mechanism of Mourning: An Anti-Entropic Mechanism. NeuroQuantology, 4, 186-197. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2006.4.2.97
Galli Carminati, G., & Martin, F. (2008). Quantum Mechanics and the Psyche. Physics of Particles and Nuclei, 39, 560-577. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779608040047
Galli Carminati, G., Martin, F., & Carminati, F. (2017). A Very Simple Quantum Model of Mind and Matter. NeuroQuantology, 15, 186-199. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2017.15.2.1031
Grinberg-Zylberbaum, J., Delaflor, M., Attie, L., & Goswami, A. (1994). The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox in the Brain: The Transferred Potential. Physics Essays, 7, 422. https://doi.org/10.4006/1.3029159
Hamer, R. M., & Simpson, P. M. (2009). Last Observation Carried Forward versus Mixed Models in the Analysis of Psychiatric Clinical Trials. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 639-641. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09040458
Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (1996). Conscious Events as Orchestrated Spacetime Selections. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3, 36-53.
Hammersley, J. M., & Grenander, U. (1960). Probability and Statistics: The Harald Cramer Volume. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 123, 339. https://doi.org/10.2307/2342476
Hollander, M., & Wolfe, D. A. (1999). Nonparametric Statistical Methods (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Holm, S. (1979). A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65-70.
Jung, C. G. (1952). Synchronicity: An Causal Connecting Principle. Princeton University Press, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400839162
Jung, C. G. (1959). The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious (2nd ed., Vol. 9). Princeton University Press, 1990.
Jung, C. G. (1960). The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche (Nachdr.). Routledge, 2014.
Jung, C. G. (1962). Memories and Dreams, Reflections. Vintage Editions.
Jung, C. G., & Hull, R. F. C. (1911). Symbols of Transformation: An Analysis of the Prelude to a Case of Schizophrenia. Princeton University Press, 1990.
Jung, C. G., Pauli, W., & Meyer, C. A. (2001). Atom and Archetype: The Pauli/Jung Letters 1932-1958 (Traduction Française: Correspondance 1932-1958 , ed. Albin Michel, 2000). Princeton University Press.
Kaës, R. (2010). Le sujet, le lien et le groupe. Groupalité psychique et alliances inconscientes. Cahiers de Psychologie Clinique, 1, 13-40. https://doi.org/10.3917/cpc.034.0013
Linehan, M. (1993a). Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. Guilford Press.
Linehan, M. (1993b). Skills Training Manual for Treating Borderline Personality Disorder. Guilford Press.
Linehan, M. (2015). DBT Skills Training Manual (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
MacKay, D. J. C. (2003). Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press.
Marshall, I. (1989). Consciousness and Bose-Einstein Condensates. New Ideas in Psychology, 7, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118X(89)90038-X
Martin, F., & Galli Carminati, G. (2009). Synchronicity, Quantum Mechanics, and Psyche. In H. Atmanspacher, & H. Primas (Eds.), Recasting Reality: Wolfgang Pauli’s Philosophical Ideas and Contemporary Science (pp. 227-243). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85198-1_11
Martin, F., Carminati, F., & Galli Carminati, G. (2009). Synchronicity, Quantum Information and the Psyche. Journal of Cosmology, 3, 580-589. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779610030032
Martin, F., Carminati, F., & Galli Carminati, G. (2010). Quantum Information, Oscillations and the Psyche. Physics of Particles and Nuclei, 41, 425-451. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779610030032
Martin, F., Carminati, F., & Galli Carminati, G. (2013). Quantum Information Theory Applied to Unconscious and Consciousness. NeuroQuantology, 11, 16-33. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2013.11.1.628
Miller, A. L., Rathus, J. H., & Linehan, M. (2006). Dialectical Behavior Therapy with Suicidal Adolescents.
Orlov, Y. F. (1982). The Wave Logic of Consciousness: A Hypothesis. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21, 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01880263
Penrose, R. (1989). The Emperor’s New Mind. Oxford University Press.
Pitkänen, M. (2010). Quantum Mind in TGD Universe. https://philpapers.org/rec/PITQMI
Richens, J. F., Selby, J. H., & Al-Safi, S. W. (2017). Entanglement Is Necessary for Emergent Classicality in All Physical Theories. Physical Review Letters, 119, Article ID: 080503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.080503
Sabbadini, S., & Vitiello, G. (2019). Entanglement and Phase-Mediated Correlations in Quantum Field Theory. Application to Brain-Mind States. Applied Sciences, 9, 3203. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9153203
Schrödinger, E. (1935). Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 31, 555-563. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100013554
Schrödinger, E. (1936). Probability Relations between Separated Systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 32, 446-452. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100019137
Terras, A. (2005). Fourier Analysis on Finite Groups and Applications (Repr., Transferred to Digital Print). Cambridge University Press.
Trojaola-Zapirain, B., Carminati, F., Fernandez Rivas, M. A., Gonzalez Torres, A., Gonzales de Mendivil, E., Fouassier, C., Martin, F., Demongeot, J., & Galli Carminati, G. (2019). An Update and Generalization of Group Unconscious Orientation in OMIE Group Training for Therapists. Neuroquantology, 17, 14-30. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2019.17.1.1918
Trojaola-Zapirain, B., Carminati, F., Gonzalez Torres, A., Gonzales de Mendivil, E., Fouassier, C., Gex-Fabry, M., Martin, F., Labarere, J., Demongeot, J., Lorincz, E. N., & Galli Carminati, G. (2014). Group Unconscious Common Orientation: Exploratory Study at the Basque Foundation for the Investigation of Mental Health Group Training for Therapists. Neuroquantology, 12, 139-150. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2014.12.1.709
Trojaola-Zapirain, B., Carminati, F., Gonzalez Torres, A., Gonzales de Mendivil, E., Fouassier, C., Gex-Fabry, M., Martin, F., Labarere, J., Demongeot, J., Lorincz, E. N., & Galli Carminati, G. (2015). Addendum on Entropy to the Exploratory Study on Group Unconscious at the Basque Foundation for the Investigation of Mental Health Group Training for Therapists. Neuroquantology, 13, 49-56. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2015.13.1.780
Trojaola-Zapirain, B., Carminati, F., Gonzalez Torres, A., Gonzales de Mendivil, E., Fouassier, C., Gex-Fabry, M., Martin, F., Labarere, J., Demongeot, J., Lorincz, E. N., & Galli Carminati, G. (2016). A Comparison of the Evolution and Entropy of Responses to Picture Choices on an “Absurdum Questionnaire” between Members of Two Different Training Groups. Neuroquantology, 14, 501-513. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2016.14.3.919
Vergopoulos, T. (1983). La sensibilisation à la dynamique de groupe d’aprés W. R. Bion et S.H. Foulkes. Médecine et Hygiène, 1, 3149-3155.
Vitiello, G. (2003). Quantum Dissipation and Information: A Route to Consciousness Modelling. NeuroQuantology, 1, 266-279. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2003.1.2.15
Zanello, A., Rouget-Weber, B., Gex Fabry, M. G., Maercker, A., & Guimon, J. (2004). New Instrument to Assess Social Functioning in Mental Health Settings. European Journal of Psychiatry, 18, 76-78.
Zurek, H. (1981). Pointer Basis of Quantum Apparatus: Into What Mixture does the Wave Packet Collapse? Physical Review D, 24, 1516-1525. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.24.1516