Background: Binary or dichotomous thinking can lead to propensity for aggression throughout a person’s life being an essential part of a person’s mentality and cultural code. Both dichotomous thinking and aggressiveness negatively affect a person’s resistance to stress and it hinders an adequate stress coping style. Aim: The aim of this study is to make a comparative analysis of dependence of different types of anger on the dichotomy of thinking in different cultures. Method: A Japanese sample consisted of 226 university students (180 females) whereas a Turkey sample included a total of 243 university students (145 females) who participated in an online survey applying socio-demographic forms, State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory, the Dichotomous Thinking Inventory. Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analyses (MGCFAs) were conducted to examine measurement invariance of the DTI and STAXI using structural equation modeling. Multiple regression analyses were examined to assess the degree to which such a cultural aspect as of dichotomous thinking predicted the different anger traits. Results: Results of the multiple regression analysis for State Anger and Trait Anger demonstrated that the effect of the country indicating State Anger to be higher in Turkey than in Japan. A noticeable negative effect of the country was also significant indicating Trait Anger to be higher in Japan than in Turkey. Furthermore, Japanese people had lower dichotomous thinking scores than Turkish people. Conclusions: The results confirmed previously proposed cultural differences, as well as opened up new avenues for exploring cultural pathways.
KeywordsDichotomous ThinkingDichotomous BeliefPreference for DichotomyAnger RegulationTrait AngerState Anger
Akaike, H. (1974). A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 6, 716-723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
Akutsu, S., Yamaguchi, A., Kim, M.-S., & Oshio, A. (2016). Self-Construals, Anger Regulation, and Life Satisfaction in the United States and Japan. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 768. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00768
Aliyev, K., Erkin, H. C., Sancakli, E., & Ilhan Ozgur, I. (2018). Validity and Reliability Study of Turkish Version of Dichotomous Thinking Inventory. Ankara: Ankara University.
Aliyev, K., & Senturk Cankorur, V. (2018). Need-Emotion Organization: An Essay. Crisis Journal, 26, 1-4.
Anderson, C. A., & Huesmann, L. R. (2003). Human Aggression: A Social-Cognitive View. In M. A. Hogg, & J. Cooper (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 296-323). Sage Publications.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Boiger, M., Mesquita, B., Uchida, Y., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2013). Condoned or Condemned: The Situational Affordance of Anger and Shame in the United States and Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 540-553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213478201
Boxer, P., & Dubow, E. F. (2001). A Social-Cognitive Information Processing Model for School-Based Aggression Reduction and Prevention Programs: Issues for Research and Practice. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 10, 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(01)80013-5
Buss, A. H. (1961). The Psychology of Aggression. John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/11160-000
Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452-459. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452
De Leersnyder, J., Boiger, M., & Mesquita, B. (2013). Cultural Regulation of Emotion: Individual, Relational, and Structural Sources. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00055
Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion Regulation: Affective, Cognitive, and Social Consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577201393198
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Ma, G. (2020). Islands and the World from an Anthropological Perspective. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 4, Article No. 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-020-00038-x
Nagtegaal, M. H., & Rassin, E. (2004). The Usefulness of the Thought Suppression Paradigm in Explaining Impulsivity and Aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1233-1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.12.007
Oshio, A. (2009). Development and Validation of the Dichotomous Thinking Inventory. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37, 729-742. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.6.729
Oshio, A. (2012). An All-or-Nothing Thinking Turns into Darkness: Relations between Dichotomous Thinking and Personality Disorders. Japanese Psychological Research, 54, 424-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5884.2012.00515.x
Ozkarar-Gradwohl, F. G., Narita, K., Montag, C., Panksepp, J., Davis, K. L., Yama, M., & Scherler, H. R. (2018). Cross-Cultural Affective Neuroscience Personality Comparisons of Japan, Turkey and Germany. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-018-0074-2
Park, D. C., Lodi-Smith, J., Drew, L., Haber, S., Hebrank, A., Bischof, G. N., & Aamodt, W. (2014). The Impact of Sustained Engagement on Cognitive Function in Older Adults: The Synapse Project. Psychological Science, 25, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613499592
Pehlivanturk, B. (2012). Turkish-Japanese Relations: Turning Romanticism into Rationality. International Journal, 67, 101-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/002070201206700108
Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the Dimension of a Model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
Siegman, A. W., & Smith, T. W. (1994). Anger, Hostility, and the Heart. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Spielberger, C. D. (1996). State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory: Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). Anger and Advancement versus Sadness and Subjugation: The Effect of Negative Emotion Expressions on Social Status Conferral. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.86
Tone, E. B., & Davis, J. S. (2012). Paranoid Thinking, Suspicion, and Risk for Aggression: A Neurodevelopmental Perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 1031-1046. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412000521
Vierikko, E., Pulkkinen, L., Kaprio, J., & Rose, R. J. (2006). Genetic and Environmental Sources of Continuity and Change in Teacher-Rated Aggression during Early Adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 308-320. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20117
Voulgaridou, I., & Kokkinos, C. M. (2015). Relational Aggression in Adolescents: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.006
Yamaguchi, A., Kim, M.-S., Oshio, A., & Akutsu, S. (2017). The Role of Anger Regulation on Perceived Stress Status and Physical Health. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 240-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.053
Zengin, A., & Yaman, U. (2018). Buddhist and Manichaeist Views on War on the Old Uyghur Turkish Texts. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, 58, 175-216. https://doi.org/10.26650/TUDED425625