Background: Previous research point to a correlation between mathematical skills and cognitive processes involved in planning and simultaneous processing. Consistent with multicomponent models of mathematical achievement (domain-general and domain-specific skills), PASS theory appears to be very useful as a multifactorial framework that provides specific tests to monitor the development of mathematical competence and to direct intervention procedures and improve mathematical skills. Objective: This study was conducted to assess the impact of the Math Modules Cognitive Training Program on the mathematical competence of typical 2 nd -grade students in calculation, problem-solving, and underlying mental functions, compared to a control group. The program was designed to optimize the Planning/FE, Attention, Simultaneous, and Successive cognitive processes through a series of tasks. Participants: The study involved 60 students aged between 6 and 8 years ( Mdn = 7 years and 7 months), who were in the second grade of two urban public schools. Method: The program focused on mathematical skill tasks related to fluent calculation and mathematical problem solving that requires PASS cognitive processes for successful completion. The intervention group received the Math Modules program, and the control group followed their usual classroom program. Students were evaluated in calculation, problem-solving, and PASS cognitive processes. Results: Our results showed that the Math Modules Cognitive Training Program focused on calculation and problem solving skills were effective in improving children’s mathematical performance and their PASS cognitive processes, generating gains not achieved by the control group. Conclusions: Our study suggests that fluid calculation and problem-solving math tasks, based on planning and simultaneous processing, could foster curricular math competency.
KeywordsMath ProficiencyMath ModulesPASS ProcessesCognitive Training ProgramCalculationProblem-Solving
Andersson, U. (2008). Working Memory as a Predictor of Written Arithmetical Skills in Children: The Importance of Central Executive Functions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 181-203. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X209854
Bull, R., & Lee, K. (2014). Executive Functioning and Mathematics Achievement. Child Development Perspectives, 8, 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12059
Bull, R., Espy, K. A., & Wiebe, S. A. (2008). Short-Term Memory, Working Memory, and Executive Functioning in Preschoolers: Longitudinal Predictors of Mathematical Achievement at Age 7 Years. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 205-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565640801982312
Cai, D., Georgiou, G. K., Wen, M., & Das, J. P. (2016). The Role of Planning in Different Mathematical Skills. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28, 234-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1103742
Cai, D., Li, Q. W., & Deng, C. P. (2013). Cognitive Processing Characteristics of 6th and 8th Grade Chinese Students with Mathematics Learning Disability: Relationship among Working Memory, PASS Processes, and Processing Speed. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 120-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.07.008
Chan, R. C. K., Shum, D., Toulopoulou, T., & Chen, E. Y. H. (2008). Assessment of Executive Functions: Review of Instruments and Identification of Critical Issues. Archives of Clinical neuropsychology, 23, 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.010
Clark, C. A., Pritchard, V. E., & Woodward, L. J. (2010). Preschool Executive Functioning Abilities Predict Early Mathematics Achievement. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1176-1191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019672
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum Associates.
Cragg, L., Keeble, S., Richardson, S., Roome, H. E., & Gilmore, C. (2017). Direct and Indirect Influences of Executive Functions on Mathematics Achievement. Cognition, 162, 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.014
Das, J. P. (2014a). Math Modules in English. University of Alberta. Fundation Center J. P. Das.
Das, J. P. (2014b). English Students Work Book. University of Alberta. Fundation Center J. P. Das.
Das, J. P. (2021). Teoría PASS Antigua y nueva. In A. Dosil (Ed.), Intervención para la mejora del aprendizaje y de los procesos cognitivos (pp. 35-52). Universidad de Vigo.
Das, J. P., & Janzen, C. (2004). Learning Math: Basic Concepts, Math Difficulties, and Suggestions for Intervention. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 32, 191-205.
Das, J. P., & Kirby, J. R. (2022). The Story of PASS Theory: Origin and Applications. Academia Letters, 5196.
Das, J. P., & Misra, S. B. (2015). Cognitive Planning and Executive Functions. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9789351507826
Das, J. P., Kirby, J., & Jarman, R. F. (1975). Simultaneous and Successive Syntheses: An Alternative Model for Cognitive Abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076163
Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of Cognitive Processes: The PASS Theory of Intelligence. Allyn & Bacon.
De Smedt, B., Janssen, R., Bouwens, K., Verschaffell, L., Boets, B., & Ghesquière, P. (2009). Working Memory and Individual Differences in Mathematics Achievement: A Longitudinal Study from First Grade to Second Grade. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 186-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.01.004
Deaño, M., Alfonso, S., & Das, J. P. (2015). Program of Arithmetic Improvement by Means of Cognitive Enhancement: An Intervention in Children with Special Educational Needs. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 352-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.032
Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., & Japel, C. (2007). School Readiness and Later Achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428-1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428.supp
Geary, D. C. (2011). Cognitive Predictors of Achievement Growth in Mathematics: A 5-Year Longitudinal Study. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1539-1552. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025510
Geary, D. C. (2013). Early Foundations for Mathematics Learning and Their Relations to Learning Disabilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 23-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412469398
Geary, D. C., & Hoard, M. K. (2005). Learning Disabilities in Arithmetic and Mathematics: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of Mathematical Cognition (pp. 253-267). Psychology Press.
Geary, D. C., Bailey, D. H., Littlefield, A., Wood, P., Hoard, M. K., & Nugent, L. (2009). First-Grade Predictors of Mathematical Learning Disability: A Latent Class Trajectory Analysis. Cognitive Development, 24, 411-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.10.001
Georgiou, G. K., Guo, K., Naveenkumar, N., Vieira, A. P. A., & Das, J. P. (2020). PASS Theory of Intelligence and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review. Intelligence, 79, Article ID: 101431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101431
Georgiou, G. K., Manolitsis, G., & Tziraki, N. (2015). Is Intelligence Relevant in Reading “Μανα” and calculating “3+5”? In T. C. Papadopoulos, R. K. Parrila, & J. R. Kirby (Eds.), Cognition, Intelligence, and Achievement (pp. 225-240). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-410388-7.00012-9
Gilmore, C., Keeble, S., Richardson, S., & Cragg, L. (2015). The Role of Cognitive Inhibition in Different Components of Arithmetic. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 771-782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0659-y
Hudson, C., Price, D., & Gross, J. (2009). The Long-Term Costs of Numeracy Difficulties. Every Child a Chance Trust.
Iglesias-Sarmiento, V., & Deaño, M. (2011). Cognitive Processing and Mathematical Achievement: A Study with Schoolchildren between Fourth and Sixth Grade of Primary Education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 570-583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411400749
Iglesias-Sarmiento, V., & Deaño, M. (2016). Arithmetical Difficulties and Low Arithmetic Achievement: Analysis of the Underlying Cognitive Functioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19, E36. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2016.40
Iglesias-Sarmiento, V., Deaño, M., Alfonso, S., & Conde, A. (2017). Mathematical Learning Disabilities and Attention Deficit and/or Hyperactivity Disorder: A Study of the Cognitive Processes Involved in Arithmetic Problem Solving. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 61, 44-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.12.012
Iseman, S. J., & Naglieri, J. A. (2011). A Cognitive Strategy Instruction to Improve Math Calculation for Children with ADHD and LD: A Randomized Controlled Study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 184-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410391190
Kirby, J. R., & Ashman, A. F. (1984). Planning Skills and Mathematics Achievement: Implications Regarding Learning Disability. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2, 9-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428298400200102
Kroesbergen, E. H., Van Luit, J. E. H., & Naglieri, J. A. (2003). Mathematical Learning Differences and PASS Cognitive Processes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 574-582. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194030360060801
Kroesbergen, E. H., Van Luit, J. E. H., Naglieri, J. A., Taddei, S., & Franchi, E. (2010). PASS Processes and Early Mathematics Skills in Dutch and Italian Kindergarteners. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 585-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282909356054
Lan, X., Legare, C., Ponitz, C., Li, S., & Morrison, F. (2011). Investigating the Links between the Subcomponents of Executive Function and Academic Achievement: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Chinese and American Preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 677-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.11.001
LeFevre, J.-A., Fast, L., Skwarchuk, S.-L., Smith-Chant, B. L., Bisanz, J., Kamawar, D., & Penner-Wilger, M. (2010). Pathways to Mathematics: Longitudinal Predictors of Performance. Child Development, 81, 1753-1767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01508.x
Lehto, J., Juujärvi, P., Kooistra, L., & Pulkkinen, L. (2003). Dimensions of Executive Functioning: Evidence from Children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151003321164627
Li, Q., & Wang, X. (2010). The Relationship between the Level of Achievement and the Cognitive Process of PASS in the Number of Students in Primary School Students. Psychology Science, 33, 1234-1236.
Luria, A. R. (1966). Human Brain and Psychological Processes. Harper & Row.
Luria, A. R. (1973). The Working Brain. Basic Books.
Luria, A. R. (1980). Higher Cortical Functions in Man. Basic Books.
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458
Naglieri, J. A. (2015). Hundred Years of Intelligence Testing: Moving from Traditional IQ to Second-Generation Intelligence Tests. In S. Goldstein, D. Princiotta, & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Handbook of Intelligence: Evolutionary Theory, Historical Perspective, and Current Concepts (pp. 295-316). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1562-0_20
Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1987). Construct and Criterion-Related Validity of Planning, Simultaneous, and Successive Cognitive Processing Tasks. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 353-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428298700500405
Naglieri, J. A., & Das, J. P. (1997). Cognitive Assessment System. Riverside.
Naglieri, J. A., & Gottling, S. H. (1997). Mathematics Instruction and PASS Cognitive Processes: An Intervention Study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 513-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000507
Naglieri, J. A., & Johnson, D. J. (2000). Effectiveness of A Cognitive Strategy Intervention to Improve Arithmetic Calculation Based on the PASS Theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 591-597. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300607
Naglieri, J. A., & Otero, T. M. (2018). Redefining Intelligence with the Planning, Attention, Simultaneous and Successive Theory of Neurocognitive Processes. In D. P. Flanagan, & E. M. McDonough (Eds.), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues (4th ed., pp. 195-218). Guilford Press.
Naglieri, J. A., & Rojahn, J. (2004). Construct Validity of the PASS Theory and CAS: Correlations with Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 174-181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.174
Noël, M. P., & Rousselle, L. (2011). Developmental Changes in the Profiles of Dyscalculia: An Explanation Based on a Double Exact-and-Approximate Number Representation Model. Frontiers in Human Neurosciencie, 5, Article 165. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00165
Parsons, S., & Bynner, J. (2005). Does Numeracy Matter More? National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy.
Rousselle, L., & Noël, M. P. (2007). Basic Numerical Skills in Children with Mathematics Learning Disabilities: A Comparison of Symbolic vs Non-Symbolic Number Magnitude Processing. Cognition, 102, 361-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.005
Sarnecka, B. W., & Carey, S. (2008). How Counting Represents Number: What Children Must Learn and When They Learn It. Cognition, 108, 662-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.007
Swanson, H. L., & Jerman, O. (2006). Math Disabilities: A Selective Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 76, 249-274. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076002249
Van der Sluis, S., De Jong, P. F., & Van der Leij, A. (2007). Executive Functioning in Children, and Its Relations with Reasoning, Reading, and Arithmetic. Intelligence, 35, 427-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.001
Van der Ven, S. H. G., Kroesbergen, E., Boom, J., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2012). The Development of Executive Functions and Early Mathematics: A Dynamic Relationship. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 100-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02035.x
Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (3rd ed.). Psychological Corporation.
Zhu, M., Cai, D., & Leung, A. W. S. (2017). Number Line Estimation Predicts Mathematical Skills: Difference in Grades 2 and 4. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1576. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01576