The Impact of College Physical Sciences on Mental Rotation Ability
- 1 Department of Psychology, Catawba College, Salisbury, USA
- 2 Department of Psychology, Catawba College, Salisbury, USA
- 3 Department of Psychology, Catawba College, Salisbury, USA
- 4 Department of Psychology, Catawba College, Salisbury, USA
Abstract
Men typically outperform women in Mental Rotation (MR) tasks, a skill that is crucial to many STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) fields. Research suggests this difference may be a partial cause for the gender gap in the sciences. Previous findings indicate that practicing MR, especially through physical science classes, may increase women’s MR performance and, perhaps, increase their involvement in STEM disciplines. However, conflicting results from existing studies make it difficult to determine the exact effect various science experiences have on MR. This study examined the relationship between physical science experience and performance on selected items from the Purdue Visualizations of Rotations Test (PVRT). College student participants with different science backgrounds (physical science, biological science, no science) completed the PVRT and provided data about their personal and childhood experiences with MR-related tasks, their perceptions of their task performance, and their college course experiences. Our results showed no significant sex differences in performance but did show that experience in physical science courses (chemistry and physics) predicted MR, while biological science experience decreased performance on these tasks. A lack of self-handicapping also predicted MR. These findings suggest that practicing these skills in classes may increase MR ability.
- Bodner, G. M., & Guay, R. B. (1997). The Purdue Visualizations of Rotations Test. The Chemical Educator, 2, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00897970138a
- Boone, A. P., & Hegarty, M. (2017). Sex Differences in Mental Rotation Tasks: Not Just in the Mental Rotation Process! Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 1005-1019. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000370
- Brownlow, S., & Miderski, C. A. (2002). How Gender and College Chemistry Experience Influence Mental Rotation Ability. Themes in Education, 3, 133-140.
- Brownlow, S., McPheron, T. K., & Acks, C. N. (2003). Science Background and Spatial Abilities in Men and Women. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12, 371-379. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000006297.90536.7c
- Brownlow, S., Valentine, S. E., & Owusu, A. (2008). Women Athletes’ Mental Rotation under Stereotype Threat. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 107, 307-316. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.107.1.307-316
- Coleman, S. L., & Gotch, A. J. (1998). Spatial Perception Skills of Organic Chemistry Students. Journal of Chemical Education, 75, 206-209. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed075p206
- Doyle, R. A., & Voyer, D. (2016). Stereotype Manipulation Effects on Math and Spatial Test Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.018
- Enge, A., Kapoor, S., Kieslinger, A., & Skeide, M. A. (2023). A Meta-Analysis of Mental Rotation in the First Years of Life. Developmental Science, e13381. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13381
- Heil, M., Krüger, M., Krist, H., Johnson, S. P., & Moore, D. S. (2018). Adults’ Sex Difference in a Dynamic Mental Rotation Task: Validating Infant Results. Journal of Individual Differences, 39, 48-52. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000248
- Kanoy, A., Brownlow, S., & Sowers, T. F. (2012). Can Rewards Obviate Stereotype Threat Effects on Mental Rotation Tasks? Psychology, 3, 542-547. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.37080
- Kass, S. J., Ahlers, R. H., & Dugger, M. (1998). Eliminating Gender Differences through Practice in an Applied Visual Spatial Task. Human Performance, 11, 337-349. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1104_3
- Lourenco, S. F., & Liu, Y. (2023). The Impacts of Anxiety and Motivation on Spatial Performance: Implications for Gender Differences in Mental Rotation and Navigation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32, 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214231153072