Moral Perfectionism and the Three Faces of Extremism: A Look from the Perspective of Psychoanalysis
- 1 Department of Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
Abstract
In this article, the author proposes that the moral perfectionism, which springs primarily from the psychological disturbance at the anal stage of an individual’s early development, is the personality basis of the political extremism. Furthermore, taking the cultural influences into the consideration, the moral perfectionists developed in three different belief systems (animistic, monotheistic, or atheistically humanistic belief system) manifest three types of political extremism respectively. Animistic extremists tend to use magic and pre-logical thinking. And in history it was typical of them to practice human sacrifice as a way for upholding their belief systems. Monotheistic extremists require the highest purity of the beliefs and the fully submission to one single spirit. In medieval Europe, they asked for perfection of people’s doing and advocate severe punishment, even death penalty, on imperfect deeds. Atheistically humanistic extremists, taking Khmer Rouge for example, with the purpose of achieving egalitarian justice, justify any costs including genocide.
- American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington DC.
- American Psychiatric Association (APA) (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
- Backes, U. (2010). Political Extremes. A Conceptual History from Antiquity to the Present. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203867259
- Berger, J. M. (2018). Extremism. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11688.001.0001
- Cichocka, A., de Zavala, A. G., Marchlewska, M., & Olechowski, M. (2015). Grandiose Delusions: Collective Narcissism, Secure In-Group Identification, and Belief in Conspiracies. In M. Bilewicz, A. Cichocka, & W. Soral (Eds.), The Psychology of Conspiracy (pp. 42–61). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
- Druckman, D. (2001). Nationalism and War: A Social-Psychological Perspective. In D. J. Christie, R. V. Wagner, & D. D. Winter (Eds.), Peace, Conflict and Violence: Peace Psychology for the 21st Century. Prentice Hall.
- Durrheim, K. (1998). The Relationship between Tolerance of Ambiguity and Attitudinal Conservatism: A Multidimensional Analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 731-753. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199809/10)28:5 3.0.CO;2-B
- Flett, G. L., & Hewitt, P. L. (2002). Perfectionism. American Psychological Association.
- Freud, S. (1939/1955). Moses and Monotheism. Vintage.
- Frost, R., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). The Dimensions of Perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 449-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172967
- Gruen, A. (2003). An Unrecognized Pathology: The Mask of Humaneness. Journal of Psychohistory, 30, 266-272.
- Hunsberger, B. (1995). Religion and Prejudice: The Role of Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 113-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01326.x
- Kimball, C. (2002). When Religion Becomes Evil: Five Warning Signs. Harper.
- Kobrin, N. H. (2016). The Jihadi Dictionary: The Essential Intel Tool for Military, Law Enforcement, Government and the Concerned Public. Multieducator Press.
- Kohut, H. (1972). Thoughts on Narcissism and Narcissistic Rage. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 27, 360-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/00797308.1972.11822721