Generative AI Should Not Be Allowed in Psychological Research
- 1 Faculty of Business and Law, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
Abstract
The author explains in this article why generative artificial intelligence (genAI) should be banned from use in psychological research. It is a form of cheating and therefore unethical because it represents artificial aiding of human effort and draws on the uncredited work of others. Even if this prohibition is ignored, as it has been by most psychology journals to date, I argue that genAI should be banned because it degrades the quality of scientific research and is likely to undermine the learning of good research skills. I will exemplify genAI’s inadequacy for research with a critique of two recently published studies investigating its capacity to generate new hypotheses in psychology.
- American Psychological Association (2025). APA Guide for Assessing AI Tools. Monitor on Psychology . https://apa.org/topics/artificial-intelligence-machine-learning/ai-research-writing
- Australian Research Council (2023). Policy on Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in The ARC’s Grants Programs .
- Banker, S., Chatterjee, P., Mishra, H., & Mishra, A. (2024). Machine-Assisted Social Psychology Hypothesis Generation. American Psychologist, 79, 789-797. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001222
- Barnes, L., & Filopovic, M. (2023). Robot Overlords Are Here but Haven’t Conquered Human Expertise Yet. The Australian .
- Blackburn, S. (1996). Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy . Oxford University Press.
- Clark, J. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Research . Universities Australia. https://universitiesaustralia.edu.au/policy-submissions/research-innovations/artificial-intelligence-in-research/
- Godwin, R. C., DeBerry, J. J., Wagener, B. M., Berkowitz, D. E., & Melvin, R. L. (2024). Grant Drafting Support with Guided Generative AI Software. SoftwareX , 27, Article 101784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2024.101784
- Harvard University (n.d.). Initial Guidelines for the Use of Generative AI Tools at Harvard . https://www.huit.harvard.edu/ai/guidelines
- Lee, V. R., Pope, D., Miles, S., & Zárate, R. C. (2024). Cheating in the Age of Generative AI: A High School Survey Study of Cheating Behaviors before and after the Release of ChatGPT. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100253
- National Health and Medical Research Council (2023). Policy on Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Grant Applications and Peer Review . https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/resources/policy-use-generative-artificial-intelligence
- National Institutes of Health (2024). NIH Issues New Centralized Resource of Policies and Practices for Promoting Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence . https://dcg.usc.edu/2024/08/07/nih-issues-new-centralized-resource-of-policies-and-practices-for-promoting-responsible-use-of-artificial-intelligence/
- National Science Foundation (n.d.). Artificial Intelligence . https://www.nsf.gov/focus-areas/artificial-intelligence
- Nolan, L. (2025). Study: AI Search Engines Cite Incorrect Sources at a 60% Rate. Breitbart . https://www.breitbart.com/techt/2025/03/15/study-ai-search-engines-cite-incorrect-sources-at-a-60-rate/