Transformative Power of Hypnosis: Breaking Myth and Implications for Stress Relief Application
- 1 AIM Greater China Psychology Research Group, Hypnosis Institute, Hong Kong SAR, China
- 2 AIM Greater China Psychology Research Group, Hypnosis Institute, Hong Kong SAR, China
- 3 AIM Greater China Psychology Research Group, Hypnosis Institute, Hong Kong SAR, China
- 4 AIM Greater China Psychology Research Group, Hypnosis Institute, Hong Kong SAR, China
- 5 AIM Greater China Psychology Research Group, Hypnosis Institute, Hong Kong SAR, China
- 6 AIM Greater China Psychology Research Group, Hypnosis Institute, Hong Kong SAR, China
Abstract
This study investigates how perceptions and attitudes towards hypnosis could affect its effectiveness in relieving stress. Despite the growing acceptance of hypnosis as a psychological intervention tool, misconceptions surrounding hypnosis continue to hinder its application. A total of 52 participants were randomly selected and invited to experience a 21-minute hypnotic session, during which they engaged in tasks addressing common myths about hypnosis. Participants completed the Attitudes Towards Hypnosis Questionnaire and self-rated their immediate stress levels and emotional states before and after the session. Statistical analysis revealed a significant reduction in self-rated stress levels, with an average decrease from 3.75 to 2.6 (p < 0.01). Additionally, participants exhibited improved attitudes towards hypnosis, with the average score on the Attitudes Towards Hypnosis Questionnaire increasing from 60.48 to 65.69 (p < 0.01). Age difference is identified with younger participants demonstrating a greater improvement in stress relief when compared to older counterparts. These findings suggest that hypnosis could effectively reduce stress and enhance emotional well-being, while challenging the prevalent misconceptions.
- Barabasz, A., & Barabasz, M. (2008). The Role of Hypnotizability in the Effectiveness of Hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 56, 337-354.
- Bongartz, W. et al. (2002). The Effects of Hypnosis on Stress-Related Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53, 1137-1144.
- Fisch, M. et al. (2020). Long-Term Effects of Group Hypnotherapy on Perceived Stress: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 76, 678-688.
- Häuser, W. et al. (2016). Hypnosis for Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Physician, 19, E245-E257.
- Landry, M. et al. (2017). Hypnosis Alters Brain Activity: Evidence from Functional Neuroimaging Studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 80, 1-12.
- Lynn, S. J., & Kirsch, I. (2006). Essentials of Clinical Hypnosis: An Evidence-Based Approach. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11365-000
- Novy, D. M. et al. (1995). Biopsychosocial Models in Understanding Chronic Pain: Implications for Treatment. Pain Management, 12, 1-10.
- Spanos, N. P., Brett, P. J., Menary, E. P., & Cross, W. P. (1987). A Measure of Attitudes toward Hypnosis: Relationships with Absorption and Hypnotic Susceptibility. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 30, 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1987.10404174
- Thompson, W. R. et al. (2019). Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Hypnosis for Pain Relief: A Systematic Review. Pain Medicine, 20, 236-246.
- Yüksel, M. et al. (2013). Physiological Effects of Hypnosis on Heart Rate Variability: A Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 61, 278-290.