Shared Distress Normalisation Theory (SDNT): Indirect Pathways to Psychological Relief via Resilience and Loneliness
- 1 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
Shared Distress Normalisation Theory (SDNT) proposes that psychological relief may arise from recognising personal distress as part of a shared human experience. While existing research has primarily focused on active coping strategies and interpersonal support, less attention has been given to passive, awareness-based mechanisms of psychological adjustment. This study examined associations between common humanity (as a proxy for shared distress normalisation), psychological distress, resilience, and loneliness. A cross-sectional design was employed with 145 adult participants who completed validated self-report measures. Data were analysed using Spearman’s correlations and regression analyses. Common humanity was significantly associated with higher resilience and lower loneliness and psychological distress. However, in multiple regression analysis, common humanity was not independently associated with psychological distress when resilience and loneliness were included, consistent with an indirect pathway. These findings provide initial empirical support for SDNT, indicating that recognising distress as shared may contribute to psychological wellbeing indirectly through enhanced resilience and reduced perceived loneliness. The results highlight the role of cognitive-perceptual processes in psychological adaptation and support SDNT as a framework describing how shared distress awareness may influence psychological outcomes through interconnected pathways rather than direct effects.
- Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, Social Support, and the Buffering Hypothesis. Ps ychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
- Gilbert, P. (2009). The Compassionate Mind: A New Approach to Life’s Challenges. Constable.
- Gilbert, P. (2014). The Origins and Nature of Compassion Focused Therapy. British J ournal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 6-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12043
- Gross, J. J. (1998). The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271-299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
- Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Loneliness Matters: A Theoretical and Empirical Review of Consequences and Mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 40, 218-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8
- Hays, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (1987). A Short-Form Measure of Loneliness. Journal of Pers onality Assessment, 51, 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5101_6
- Heinrich, L. M., & Gullone, E. (2006). The Clinical Significance of Loneliness: A Literature Review. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 695-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2006.04.002
- Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., Normand, S. T. et al. (2002). Short Screening Scales to Monitor Population Prevalences and Trends in Non-Specific Psychological Distress. Psychological Medicine, 32, 959-976. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291702006074
- Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping . Springer. https://books.google.com/books?id=i-ySQQuUpr8C
- Neff, K. (2003). Self-Compassion: An Alternative Conceptualization of a Healthy Attitude toward Oneself. Self and Identity, 2, 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309032
- Neff, K. D., & Germer, C. K. (2013). A Pilot Study and Randomized Controlled Trial of the Mindful Self‐Compassion Program. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69, 28-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21923
- Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008). The Brief Resilience Scale: Assessing the Ability to Bounce Back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 194-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705500802222972
- Zessin, U., Dickhäuser, O., & Garbade, S. (2015). The Relationship between Self‐Compassion and Well‐Being: A Meta-Analysis. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 7, 340-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12051