Unique Screener of Reading Fluency and Comprehension for Adolescents and Adults
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
Abstract
Because there are few brief reading fluency screeners available for older adolescents and adults we developed one, then investigated its psychometric properties, obtained for 161 college students. Two experimental versions of this unique, silent, group-administered screener of reading fluency and comprehension require adolescents and adults either to read and identify ideas or words (i.e., word chaining) within connected text of increasing difficulty. Both instruments and the Nelson-Denny Reading Test (Brown, Fishco, & Hanna, 1993) were administered in counterbalanced order. Results indicate moderately strong relationships (r values ranged from .52 to .63) between both versions of the screener and Nelson-Denny comprehension and rate scores. These data provide preliminary evidence of validity for these screeners for this population. The format requiring examinees to identify ideas produced slightly higher correlations with Nelson-Denny comprehension scores than did the word chain format. Both may be useful because they can be created from existing curriculum materials and are efficient (i.e., group administered) and quick (requiring only 5 minutes).
- ACT (2006). What the ACT reveals about college readiness in reading. Iowa City, IA: Author.
- AIMSweb (n.d.) Retrieved January 8, 2007 from http://www.aimsweb.com
- Albro, E. R. (2009). Funding for reading research: Grant competitions at the Institute of Education Sciences. Presentation to the National Reading Conference, Albuquerque, NM.
- Allington, R. L. (2009). What really matters in fluency: Research-based practices across the curriculum. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
- Bell, A. M., & McCallum, R. S. (2010). Fluency and comprehension screener: Adults (FACS: A). Unpublished test. University of Tennessee.
- Behrman, E. H. (2000). Developmental placement decisions: Content- specific reading assessment. Journal of Developmental Education, 23, 12-14, 16, 18.
- Bell, S. M., & McCallum, R. S. (2008). Handbook of reading assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Bell, S. M. McCallum, R. S., Richardson, E., Fuller, E., & McCane, S. (2007). Investigation of the psychometric attributes of the Test of Silent Contextual Reading Fluency. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 39-46. doi:10.1177/15345084070330010501
- Brown, J. A., Fishco, V. V., & Hanna, G. (1993). Nelson-denny reading test: Manual for scoring and interpretation, forms G & H. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing
- Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. (2002). Modern language aptitude test: Manual. N. Bethesda, MD: Second Language Testing, Inc.
- Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). DIBELS oral reading fluency passages for first through third grades. (Technical report no. 10). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
- Hammill, D. D., Wiederholt, J. L., & Allen, E. A. (2006). TOSCRF: Test of silent contextual reading fluency: Examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
- Hopkins, M. B., Mounger, A., Kirk, E. R., & McCallum, R. S. (2009). Reading fluency: A brief ecological classroom assessment. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association of School Psychologists Conference, Boston, MA.
- Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman tests of educational achievement (2nd Edition). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
- Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 230-251. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4