The Dark Triad consists of Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy. The aim was to add to the evidence for their differential validity. A battery including the Hogan Development Survey, the IPIP Big 5 and measures of Empathy, Aggression and the Dark Triad was administered to 241 undergraduate psychology participants at an Australian university. Multivariate regression indicated that the Dark Triad shared significant predictors and the Five Factor Model facets failed to clearly distinguish between them. The results of a principal components analysis indicated considerable overlap among the constructs. Overall, limited evidence for the differential construct validity of the Dark Triad of personality was found. Implications for the psychometric properties of some dominant paradigms in personality research, and applications in organisational settings, are discussed.
KeywordsDark TriadFive-Factor ModelHogan Development SurveyConstruct Validity
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Bishopp, D., & Hare, R. D. (2008). A multidimensional scaling analysis of the Hare PCL-R: Unfolding the structure of psychopathy. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 117-132. doi:10.1080/10683160701483484
Blackburn, R., & Coid, J. W. (1998). Psychopathy and the dimensions of personality disorder in violent offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 129-145. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00027-0
Buss, A.H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 63, 452-459. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452
Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
Cleckley, H. (1955). The mask of sanity: An attempt to clarify some issues about the so-called psychopathic personality (3rd ed.). St Louis: Mosby. doi:10.1037/11395-000
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21-50. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2
Douglas, H., Bore, M., & Munro, D. (2011). Construct validity of a two-factor model of psychopathy. Psychology, in press.
Friedenfelt, J., & Klinteberg, B. (2007). Exploring adult personality and psychopathy tendencies in former childhood hyperactive delinquent males. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 27-36. doi:10.1027/1614-0001.28.1.27
Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloniger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (1989). Discriminant validity of the psychopathy checklist in a forensic psychiatric population. Psychological Assessment, 1, 211-218. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.1.3.211
Hildebrand, M., & de Ruiter, C. (2004). PCL-R psychopathy and its relation to patients in the Netherlands. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 27, 233-248. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.03.005
Hodson, G., Hogg, S. M., & MacInnis, C. C. (2009). The role of “dark personalities” (narcissism, machiavellianism, psychopathy), big five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 686-690. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.005
Hogan, R. (2007). Personality and the fate of organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (2001). Assessing leadership: A view from the dark side. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 9, 40. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00162
Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Warrenfeltz, R. (2007). The Hogan guide: Interpretation and use of Hogan inventories. Hogan Assessment Systems, Inc.
Hyler, S. E., Skodol, A. E., Oldham, J. M., Kellman, H. D., & Doidge, N. (1992). The validity of the PDQ-R: A replication in an out-patient sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 33, 73-77. doi:10.1016/0010-440X(92)90001-7
International Personality Item Pool. A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences. URL. http://ipip.ori.org/
Jakobwitz, S., & Egan, V. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 331-339. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.006
Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Teicher, E. A. (2010). Who is James Bond? The dark triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8, 111-120.
Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., & Fitzpatrick, C. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151-158. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.151
McHoskey, J. W. (2001). Machiavellianism and personality dysfunction. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 791-798. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00187-2
McHoskey, J. W., Worzel, W., & Szyarto, C. (1998). Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 192-210. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.192
Miller, J. D., Dir, A., Gentile, B., Wilson, L., Pryor, L. R., & Campbell, W. K. (2010). Searching for a vulnerable dark triad: Comparing factor 2 psychopathy, vulnerable narcissism, and borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality, 78, 1529-1564. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00660.x
Munro, D., Bore, M., & Powis, D. (2005). Personality factors in professional ethical behaviour: Studies of empathy and narcissism. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57, 49-60. doi:10.1080/00049530412331283453
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
Ray, J. J. (1982). Machiavellianism, forced-choice formats and the validity of the F scale. A rejoinder to bloom. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 779-782.
Shea, M. T., & Beatty, J. R. (1983). Measuring machiavellianism with MACH V: A psychometric investigation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 509-513. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4705_11
Todman, J. (2007). Experimental design and statistics for psychology. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.