The influence of procedural justice on intended innovative behavior was studied in a sample of students and employees. Although earlier studies suggests that procedural justice increases innovation-related behavior such as spontaneous cooperation, so far systematic research is scarce. Results indicated that the provision of voice increased participants’ intention to show innovative behavior such as task revision, creativity, and persistence in a business simulation task. Furthermore, the effects found were mediated by intrinsic motivation and identification, but not by occupational self-efficacy. These findings suggest that justice in organizations and procedural fair conditions in particular can drive innovations.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5533-8
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123-167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184. doi:10.2307/256995
Andrews, J., & Smith, D. C. (1996). In search of the marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 174-187. doi:10.2307/3152145
Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 265-285. doi:10.1348/096317900167029
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bunce, D., & West, M. A. (1995). Self perceptions and perceptions of group climate as predictors of individual innovation at work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 44, 199-215. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1995.tb01076.x
Clark, K., & James, K. (1999). Justice and positive and negative creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 311-320. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1204_9
Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2958
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
Earley, P. C., & Lind, E. A. (1987). Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1148-1160. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1148
Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. K. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130. doi:10.2307/256422
Frese, M., Teng, E., & Wijnen, C. J. D. (1999). Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of making suggestions in companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1139-1155. doi:10.1002/1099-1379.20.7
Gilson, L. L. (2001). The role of procedural justice in the relationship between demographic diversity, dissimilarity, work-related affective outcomes, and creative performance. Unpublished Dissertational Thesis, Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology.
Greenberg, J., & Colquitt, J. (2005). Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Judge, W. Q., Fryxell, G. E., & Dooley, R. S. (1997). The new task of R&D management: Creating goal-directed communities for innovation. California Management Review, 39, 72-85.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 77-124.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2
Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.952
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123. doi:10.1002/job.4030130202
Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T., & Sardessai, R. (2005). Determinants of innovative work behaviour: Development and test of an integrated model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 142-150. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00334.x
Rheinberg, F. (1989). Purpose and occupation. In F. Rheinberg (Ed.), Zweck und T?tigkeit (pp. 61-161). G?ttingen: Hogrefe.
Schepers, P., & Van den Berg, P. T. (2007). Social factors of work environment creativity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21, 407-428. doi:10.1007/s10869-006-9035-4
Schyns, B., & von Collani, G. (2002). A new occupational self-efficacy scale and its relation to personality constructs and organizational variables. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 219-241. doi:10.1080/13594320244000148
Shapiro, D. L., & Brett, J. M. (1993). Comparing three processes underlying judgements of procedural justice: A field study of mediation and arbitration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1167-1177. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1167
Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 703-714. doi:10.2307/30040662
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Staw, B. M., & Boettger, R. D. (1990). Task revision: A neglected form of work performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 534-559. doi:10.2307/256580
Streicher, B., Jonas, E., Maier, G. W., Frey, D., & Spie?berger, A. (2012). Procedural fairness and innovation: Does voice promote people’s creative vein? Creativity Research Journal. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.730334
Tan, H. H., & Tan, C. S. F. (2000). Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126, 241-260.
Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. doi:10.2307/3480099
Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541-566. doi:10.2307/3480099
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137-1148. doi:10.2307/3069429
Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591-620. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x
Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323-345. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_4
Tyler, T. R. (1999). Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 201-246.
Tyler, T. R. (2000). Social justice: Outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 117-125. doi:10.1080/002075900399411
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 482-497. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.482
Van den Bos, K. (2005). What is responsible for the fair process effect? In J. Greenberg, & J. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 273-300). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
Van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1034-1046. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1034
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Weiss, H. M., Suckow, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 786-794. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.786
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682-696. doi:10.2307/3069410