Appreciative Inquiry: An Effective Training Alternative to Traditional Adult Learning?
- 1 HR-Organization Development, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
- 2 HR-Organization Development, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
Abstract
While the practice of positive psychology has flourished in the last decade, critics still point to the lack of intervention-based research and empirical evidence as a shortcoming of this field. Appreciative inquiry (AI), an intervention with similar theoretical underpinnings as positive psychology, has the capacity to expand what is known about the impact of positivity in the study of organizations. AI is an intervention that uses reflective questions of positive experiences to create new opportunities. However, there is scant research on its effectiveness in real-world settings. This study extends this line of research by evaluating the effectiveness of AI as an alternative to conventional adult learning methodologies, as well as an applied example of an intervention based on positive psychology to study organizational change. Results from changes in pre- and post-assessments following three AI-based interventions, when compared to those from a control group, suggest AI can lead to significant gains in participants’ perceived attitudinal, behavioral, and cognitive learning similar to traditional adult learning methodologies. In addition, these results suggest AI interventions paired with real-world problem solving opportunities yield greater gains in participants’ perceived confidence to demonstrate positive interpersonal skills. Implications for using AI in the course of adult learning are discussed.
- Alliger, G. M., Tannenbaum, S. I., Bennett, W., Traver, H., & Shotland, A. (1997). A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel Psychology, 50, 341-358. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00911.x
- Bushe, G. (2007). Appreciative Inquiry is not (just) about the positive. OD Practitioner, 39, 30-35.
- Bushe, G. (2011). Appreciative inquiry: Theory and critique. In D. Boje, B. Burnes, & J. Hassard (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Organizational Change (pp. 87-103). Oxford: Routledge.
- Bushe, G. R., & Kassam, A. F. (2005). When is appreciative inquiry transformational? A meta-case analysis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41, 161-181. doi:10.1177/0021886304270337
- Caza, B. B., & Caza, A. (2008). Positive organizational scholarship: A critical theory perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17, 21 30. doi:10.1177/1056492607305907
- Cooperrider, D., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
- Fineman, S. (2006). On being positive: Concerns and counterpoints. Academy of Management Review, 31, 270-291. doi:10.5465/AMR.2006.20208680
- Foster, S. L., & Lloyd, P. J. (2007). Positive psychology principles applied to consulting psychology at the individual and group level. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 59, 30-40. doi:10.1037/1065-9293.59.1.30
- Gable, S. L., & Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology, 9, 103-110. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.103
- Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75, 27-61. doi:10.3102/00346543075001027
- Grant, S., & Humphries, M. (2006). Critical evaluation of appreciative inquiry. Action Research, 4, 401-418. doi:10.1177/1476750306070103
- Holladay, C. H., & Quinones, M. A. (2008). The influence of training focus and trainer characteristics on diversity training effectiveness. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7, 343-354. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2008.34251672
- Jones, R. S. P. (2010). Appreciative inquiry: More than just a fad? British Journal of Healthcare Management, 16, 114-122.
- Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311-328. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311