Use of Eye Movement Tracking in the Differential Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Reading Disability
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Abstract
The present study examined the clinical utility of eye movement tracking in the differential diagnosis of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Reading Disorder (RD). It was anticipated that eye movement tracking would provide a better understanding of the underlying deficits that potentially contribute to reading difficulties among children with ADHD and RD. Participants included 27 children diagnosed with ADHD, 20 that met criteria for a reading disorder and 30 Control children with no clinical diagnosis. All participants were between the ages of 6 to 12. Consistent with previous research, children in the RD group displayed slower reading time, longer fixation duration and more atypical eye movements as compared to Control children. Children with ADHD also displayed more atypical eye movement as compared to Control children. The only significant difference between the ADHD and RD groups was in total reading time. Results of a discriminant analysis revealed that less than 60% of participants were given the correct diagnostic classification based on total reading time and proportion of left to right saccades indicating limited support for this measure in diagnosis of ADHD versus RD.
- American Psychiatric Association, “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,” 4th Edition, Text Revision, Washington, DC, 2000.
- J. R. Nelson, G. J. Benner, K. Lane and B. W. Smith, “Academic Achievement of K-12 Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders,” Exceptional Children, Vol. 71, No. 1, 2004, pp. 59-73.
- K. Rayner, “Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 124, No. 3, 1998, pp. 372-422.
- R. A. Barkley, “Response Inhibition in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder,” Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1999, pp. 177-184.
- A. M. LaGreca, A. F. Kuttler and W. L. Stone, “Assessing Children through Interviews and Behavioral Ob-servations,” In: C. E. Walker and M. C. Roberts, Eds., Hand-book of Clinical Child Psychology, 3rd Edition, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 2001, pp. 90-106.
- S. M. Bell, R. S. McCallum and E. A. Cox, “Toward a Research Based Assessment of Dyslexia: Using Cognitive Measures to Identify Reading Disabilities,” Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2003, pp. 505- 516.
- V. A. Berninger, “Understanding the ‘Lexia’ in Dyslexia: A Multidisciplinary Team Approach to Learning Disabilities,” Annals of Dyslexia, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2001, pp. 23-48.
- E. G. Willcutt, B. F. Pennington, R. Boada, J. S. Ogline, R. A. Tunick, N. A. Chhabildas and R. K. Olson, “A Comparison of the Cognitive Deficits in Reading Disability and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 110, 2001, pp. 157-172.
- R. I. Nicolson and A. J. Fawcett, “Development of Objective Procedures for Screening and Assessment of Dyslexic Students in Higher Education,” Journal of Research in Reading, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1997, pp. 77-83.
- R. A. Barkley, “Behavioral Inhibition, Sustained Attention, and Executive Functions: Constructing a Unifying Theory of ADHD,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 121, No. 1, 1997, pp. 65-94.
- S. Y. Padget, D. F. Knight and D. J. Sawyer, “Tennessee meets the Challenge of Dyslexia,” Annals of Dyslexia, Vol. 46, No. 1, 1996, pp. 51-72.
- S. L. Decker, D. E. McIntosh, A. M. Kelly, S. K. Nicholls and R. S. Dean, “Comorbidity among Individuals Classified with Attention Disorders,” International Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 110, No. 1-2, 2001, pp. 43-54.