Structure of semantic memory was investigated in the way of neural network simulations in detail. In the literature, it is well-known that brain damaged patients often showed category specific disorder in various cognitive neuropsychological tasks like picture naming, categorisation, identification tasks and so on. In order to describe semantic memory disorder of brain damaged patients, the attractor neural network model originally proposed Hinton and Shallice (1991) was employed and was tried to re-evaluate the model performance. Especially, in order to answer the question about organization of semantic memory, how our semantic memories are organized, computer simulations were conducted. After the model learned data set ( Tyler, Moss, Durrant-Peatfield, & Levy, 2000 ) , units in hidden and cleanup layers were removed and observed its performances. The results showed category specificity. This model could also explain the double dissociation phenomena. In spite of the simplicity of its architecture, the attractor neural network might be considered to mimic human behavior in the meaning of semantic memory organization and its disorder. Although this model could explain various phenomenon in cognitive neuropsychology, it might become obvious that this model had one limitation to explain human behavior. As far as investigation in this study, asymmetry in category specificity between animate and inanimate objects might not be ex plained on this model without any additional assumptions. Therefore, further studies must be required to improve our understanding for semantic memory organisation.
Bullinaria, J. A. (1999). Connectionisit dissociations, confounding factors and modularity. Proceedings of the Fifth Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop, 52-63.
Capitani, E., Laiaconna, M., Mahon, B., & Caramazza, A. (2003). What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 213-261. doi:10.1080/02643290244000266
Caramazza, A., Hillis, A., Rapp, B. C., & Romani, C. (1990). The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions? Cognitive Neuropsycholgy, 7, 161-189. doi:10.1080/02643299008253441
Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. (1998). Domain specific knowledge system in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1-34. doi:10.1162/089892998563752
De Renzi, E., & Lucchelli, F. (1994). Are semantic systems separately represented in the brain? The case of living category impairment. Cortex, 30, 3-25.
Devlin, J., Gonnerman, L., Andersen, E., & Seidenberg, M. (1998). Category specific semantic deficits in focal and widespred brain damage: A computational account. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 77-94. doi:10.1162/089892998563798
Farah, M. J., & McClelland, J. L. (1991). A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 339-357. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.120.4.339
Hillis, A., & Caramazza, A. (1991). Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: A double dissociation. Brain, 114, 2081-2094. doi:10.1093/brain/114.5.2081
Hinton, G. E., & Shallice, T. (1991). Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia. Psychological Review, 98, 74-95. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.1.74
Humphreys, G. W., & Forde, E. M. (2001). Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Categoryspecific” neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 453-509.
Josephs, J. E. (2001). Functional neuroimaging studies of category specificity in object recognition: A critical review and meta-analysis. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1, 119-136. doi:10.3758/CABN.1.2.119
Lewis, J. W. (2006). Cortical networks related to human use of tools. Neuroscientist, 12, 211-231. doi:10.1177/1073858406288327
Martin, A., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Neuropsychological and neuroimaging perspectives on conceptual knowledge: An introduction. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 195-212. doi:10.1080/02643290342000050
Martin, A., & Chao, L. L. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 194-201. doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00196-3
Nielsen, J. M. (1946). Agnosia, apraxia, aphasia: Their value in cerebral localization. New York: Hoeber.
Patterson, K., Plaut, D., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., Behrmann, M., & Hoges, J. R. (1996). Connections and disconnections: A connectionist account of surface dyslexia. In J. Reggia, & E. Ruppin (Eds.), Neural modeling of cognitive and brain disorders (pp. 177-199). New York: World Scientific.
Perry, C. (1999). Testing a computational account of category-specic decits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 312-320. doi:10.1162/089892999563418
Plaut, D. (1995). Double dissociation without modularity: Evidence from connectionist neuropsychology. Journal of Clinical and Expremental Neuropsychology, 17, 291-231. doi:10.1080/01688639508405124
Plaut, D. (2001). A connectionist approach to word reading and acquired dyslexia: Extension to sequential processing. In M. H. Christiansen, & N. Charter (Eds.), Connectionist Psycholinguistics (pp. 244-278). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
Plaut, D., MaClelland, J. L., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). Reading exception words and pseudowords: Are two routes really necessary? In J. P. Levy, D. Bairaktaris, J. A. Bullinaria, & P. Cairns (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop. London: University College London Press.
Plaut, D., McClelland, J. L., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). Reading exception words and pseudowords: Are two routes really necessary? In J. P. Levy, D. Bairaktaris, J. A. Bullinaria, & P. Cairns (Eds.), Connectionist Models of Memory and Language (pp. 145-159). London: University College London Press.
Plaut, D., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377-500. doi:10.1080/02643299308253469
Seidenberg, M. S., Alan, P., Plaut, D., & MacDonald, M. C. (1996). Pseudohomophone effects and models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 48-62. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.48
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
Seidenberg, M. S., Plaut, D., Petersen, A. S., McClelland, J. L., & McRae, K. (1994). Nonword pronunciation and models of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1177-1196. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.6.1177
Simmons, W. K., & Barasalou, L.W. (2003). The similarity-in-topography principle: Reconciling theories of conceptual deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 451-486. doi:10.1080/02643290342000032
Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory: Inferring “how” from “where”. Neuropsychologia, 41, 280-292. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00161-6
Tyler, L., Moss, H. E., Durrant-Peatfield, M. R., & Levy, J. P. (2000). Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: A distributed account of category-specific deficits. Brain and Language, 75, 195-231. doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2353
Warrington, E. K. (1981). Neuropsychological studies of verbal semantic systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 295, 411-423. doi:10.1098/rstb.1981.0149
Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. (1983). Category specific access dysphasia. Brain, 106, 859-878. doi:10.1093/brain/106.4.859
Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. (1994). Multiple meaning systems in the brain: A case for visual semantics. Neuropsychologica, 32, 1465-1473. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(94)90118-X
Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. A. (1987). Categories of knowledge further fracitonations and an attempted integration. Brain, 110, 1273-1296. doi:10.1093/brain/110.5.1273
Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairment. Brain, 107, 829-854. doi:10.1093/brain/107.3.829