Span of Attention across Stages of Intellectual Impairment: Does Affective Stimulation Matter?
- 1 Department of Psychology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India
- 2 Department of Psychology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India
Abstract
The present study explores how affectivity and abstraction value influences the span of attention of nor mal and retarded population. Five intellectual functioning groups were chosen, six in each (N = 30), from both sexes, age of 11 - 23 (mean age 17.36) years from the urban hospitals and educational institutions. For standardization of stimulus materials and controlling of extraneous variables three preliminary expe riments were done. A repeated measure experimental design was followed in the main study. Result shows attention span tends to decrease with an increment in abstraction level in the lower range of intel lectual ladder. Affective loading in stimulus materials does not enhance the span of attention, per se it in hibits cognition. The result was interpreted in the light of behavioural observation during the experimental conditions as well as the obtained statistical output. Overall analysis revealed that the persons with mod erate retardation scored better in attention span in comparison to mild retarded group where average group scored highest. So, the result of span of attention did not follow the ladder of intellectual impairment. The causal attribution on result was interpreted in terms of environmental distraction and the lack of basic cognitive need of the moderately retarded persons which inversely facilitated better attention span as their attention span remains unaffected by distraction. The result is helpful to design the learning materials for the specific intellectual group.
- Anderson, A. K. (2005). Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 258-281. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.258
- Anthony, J. S. (2004). Affection and attention: On the phenomenology of becoming aware. Continental Philosophy Review, 37, 21-43. doi:10.1023/B:MAWO.0000049298.44397.be
- Brooks, P. H., & McCauley, C. (1984). Cognitive research in mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 479-486.
- Craik, F. I., & Masani, P. A. (1969). Age and intelligence differences in coding and retrieval of word lists. British Journal of Psychology, 60, 315-319. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1969.tb01202.x
- Crosby, K. G., & Blatt, B. (1968). Attention and mental retardation. Journal of Education, 150, 67-81.
- Darwin, C. (1872). On the expression of emotions in men and animals. London: John Murray. doi:10.1037/10001-000
- Denny, M. R. (1964). Learning and performance. In H. A. Stevens, & R. Heber (Eds.), Mental retardation: A review of research (pp. 100-142). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Denny, M. R. (1966). A theoretical analysis and its application to training the retarded. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (pp. 1-27). New York: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0074-7750(08)60201-3
- Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
- Drew, C. J., Jardman, M., & Logan, D. R. (1996). Mental retardation. A life cycle approach (6th ed.). London: Prentice Hall.
- Drew, C. J., Hardman, M. L., & Hart, A. W. (1996). Designing and conducting research in education and social science. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Dolan, R. J. (2002). Emotion, cognition, and behavior. Review Neuroscience and Psychology, 298, 1191-1194.
- Goleman, D. P. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ for character, health and lifelong achievement. New York: Bantam Books.
- Hadley, C. B., & Mackay, D. G. (2006). Does emotion help or hinder immediate memory? Arousal versus priority-binding mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, Cognition, 32, 79-88. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.79