No Demonstrable Relationship Was Found between Alcohol Dependence and Concomitant Drug Abuse amongst Detainees in Police Custody in West Yorkshire, England
- 1 School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, UK
- 2 School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, UK
Abstract
The behavioural effects of alcohol and drug abuse may lead to arrest by the police. Individuals who abuse one substance may be at risk of developing multiple drug dependencies. Using the forensic records, data were collected on 50 successive subjects detained in police custodies across West Yorkshire, England who had gave history of alcohol addiction to a single practitioner. The degree of correlation between alcohol dependency and illicit drug usage was assessed by calculating the Spearman’s Rank coefficient. Thirty three subjects in this study did not use any illicit drugs. There was no correlation between alcohol dependency and concomitant drug abuse in this group. Spearman’s coefficient was statistically insignificant ( p = 0.230). Kruskal’s Gamma, which is used for comparing ordinal data, also failed to show a significant link between the alcohol and drug group ( p = 0.185). As the degree of alcohol dependency increased, co-use of other drugs decreased. Conversely as the use of stronger drugs increased, co-use with alcohol and other drugs increased. Alcohol dependency is a distinct disorder. Once alcoholism had set in, the use of other drugs falls. The forensic behavioural patterns linked alcohol with “violent disorder” and Class A drug abuse with “organised crime”. This study does not support the contention that most alcohol dependent individuals will also abuse illicit drugs .
- Barnwell, S. S., & Earleywine, M. (2006). Simultaneous Alcohol and Cannabis Expectancies Predict Simultaneous Use. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 11, 1-29.
- Bohman, M., Cloninger, C. R., Sigvardsson, S., &von Knorring, A. L. (1982). Predisposition to Petty Criminality in Swedish Adoptees. 1. Genetic and Environmental Heterogeneity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 1233-1241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290110001001
- Cobbs, L. W. (1992). Shakes and Flashes in a Relapsed Alcoholic. Hospital Practice, 27, 102, 107, 110.
- French, M. T., Fang, H., & Fretz, R. (2010). Economic Evaluation of a Pre-Release Substance Abuse Treatment Program for Repeat Criminal Offenders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38, 31-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2009.06.001
- Gonzales-Saiz, F., Domingo-Salvany, A., Barrio, G., Sanchez-Niubo, A., Brugal, M. T., de la Fuente, L., & Alonso, J. (2009). Severity of Dependence Scale as a Diagnostic Tool for Heroin and Cocaine Dependence. European Addiction Research, 15, 87-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000189787
- Gorwood, P. (2000). Contribution of Genetics to the Risk Status for Alcohol Dependence. Journal de la Société de Biologie, 194, 43-49.
- Griffiths, P., Mravcik, V., Lopez, D., & Klempova, D. (2008). Quite a Lot of Smoke but Very Limited Fire—The Use of Methamphetamine in Europe. Drug and Alcohol Review, 27, 236-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09595230801932588
- Hoffmann, N. G., Hunt, D. E., Rhodes, W. M., & Riley, J. (2003). UNCOPE: A Brief Substance Dependence Screen for Use with Arrestees. Journal of Drug Issues, 33, 29-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002204260303300102
- Hou, Q. F., & Li, S. B. (2009). Potential Association of DRD2 and DAT1 Genetic Variation with Heroin Dependence. Neuroscience Letters, 464, 127-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2009.08.004
- Kader, R., Seedat, S., Koch, J.R., & Parry, C. D. (2012). A Preliminary Investigation of AUDIT and DUDIT in Comparison to Biomarkers for Alcohol and Drug Use among HIV-Infected Clinic Attendees in Cape Town, South Africa. African Journal of Psychiatry, 15, 346-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ajpsy.v15i5.43
- Kraanen, F. L., Scholing, A., & Emmelkamp, P. M. (2012). Substance Use Disorders in Forensic Psychiatry: Differences among Different Types of Offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 1201-1219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11420252