Behavioural Differences in Brown-Norway and Wild-Type Rats Maintained in Standard or Enriched Environment in Response to Novelty in a Familiarised Environment — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Behavioural Differences in Brown-Norway and Wild-Type Rats Maintained in Standard or Enriched Environment in Response to Novelty in a Familiarised Environment
Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
,
Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
,
Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
,
Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
1 Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
2 Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
3 Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
4 Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
Maintaining animals in an enriched environment may have different effects on animals depending on their background. Wild-type rats, such as WWCPS (Warsaw Wild Captive Pisula Stryjek) rats, are at an early stage of adaptation to laboratory conditions, and we can hypothesise that enriched laboratory environment provides them with conditions much closer to a natural habitat than standard laboratory cages. The WWCPS rats responded to novelty by orienting their behaviour towards the source of change, followed by rapid habituation of that response. The laboratory rats responded similarly to WWCPS rats immediately after the change, but their increased activity in that section of the experimental cage was not subjected to habituation. We propose, that for animals at early stages of domestication, information-seeking is more important in the regulation of their behaviour than it is for fully domesticated animals. In the latter, it is the stimulus-seeking that dominates behaviour regulation. Laboratory rats, and WWCPS rats showed different profiles of response to maintaining in the enriched laboratory conditions.
Barnett, S. A., Dickson, R. G., & Hocking, W. E. (1979). Genotype and Environment in the Social Interactions of Wild and Domestic “Norway” Rats. Aggressive Behavior, 5, 105-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1979)5:2 3.0.CO;2-U
Blanchard, R. J., Flannelly, K. J., & Blanchard, D. C. (1986). Defensive Behavior of Laboratory and Wild Rattus Norvegicus. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 100, 101-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.100.2.101
Boice, R. (1973). Domestication. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 215-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0034893
Boice, R. (1977). Burrows of Wild and Albino Rats: Effects of Domestication, Outdoor Raising, Age, Experience, and Maternal State. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 91, 649-661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0077338
Boyles, W. R., Black, R. W., & Furchtgott, E. (1965). Early Experience and Cardiac Responsivity in the Female Albino Rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 59, 447-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0022043
Branchi, I., Santarelli, S., D’Andrea, I., & Alleva, E. (2013). Not All Stressors Are Equal: Early Social Enrichment Favors Resilience to Social but Not Physical Stress in Male Mice. Hormones and Behavior, 63, 503-509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.01.003
Christoff, K., Ream, J. M., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2004). Neural Basis of Spontaneous thought Processes. Cortex, 40, 623-630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70158-8
Dellu, F., Mayo, W., Vallée, M., Maccari, S., Piazza, P. V., Le Moal, M., & Simon, H. (1996). Behavioral Reactivity to Novelty during Youth as a Predictive Factor of Stress-Induced Corticosterone Secretion in the Elderly—A Life-Span Study in Rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 21, 441-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4530(96)00017-0
Diamond, M. C. (2001). Response of the Brain to Enrichment. Anais Da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 73, 211-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37652001000200006
Epp, J. R., Barker, J. M., & Galea, L. A. M. (2009). Running Wild: Neurogenesis in the Hippocampus across the Lifespan in Wild and Laboratory-Bred Norway Rats. Hippocampus, 19, 1040-1049. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20546
Fairhurst, G. D., Frey, M. D., Reichert, J. F., Szelest, I., Kelly, D. M., & Bortolotti, G. R. (2011). Does Environmental Enrichment Reduce Stress? An Integrated Measure of Corticosterone from Feathers Provides a Novel Perspective. PLOS ONE, 6, e17663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017663
Fernández-Teruel, A., Escorihuela, R. M., Castellano, B., González, B., & Tobena, A. (1997). Neonatal Handling and Environmental Enrichment Effects on Emotionality, Novelty/Reward Seeking, and Age-Related Cognitive and Hippocampal Impairments: Focus on the Roman Rat Lines. Behavior Genetics, 27, 513-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021400830503
Fonio, E., Benjamini, Y., Sakov, A., & Golani, I. (2006). Wild Mouse Open Field Behavior Is Embedded within the Multidimensional Data Space Spanned by Laboratory Inbred Strains. Genes, Brain, and Behavior, 5, 380-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2005.00170.x
Foti, F., Laricchiuta, D., Cutuli, D., De Bartolo, P., Gelfo, F., Angelucci, F., & Petrosini, L. (2011). Exposure to an Enriched Environment Accelerates Recovery from Cerebellar Lesion. The Cerebellum, 10, 104-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12311-010-0236-z
Genaro, G., & Schmidek, W. R. (2002). The Influence of Handling and Isolation Postweaning on Open Field, Exploratory and Maternal Behavior of Female Rats. Physiology & Behavior, 75, 681-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00661-3
Hebb, D. O. (1955). Drives and the CNS (Conceptual Nervous System). Psychological Review, 62, 243-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0041823
Himmler, B. T., Stryjek, R., Modlinska, K., Derksen, S. M., Pisula, W., & Pellis, S. M. (2013). How Domestication Modulates Play Behavior: A Comparative Analysis between Wild Rats and a Laboratory Strain of Rattus norvegicus. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 127, 453-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032187
Himmler, S. M., Modlinska, K., Stryjek, R., Himmler, B. T., Pisula, W., & Pellis, S. M. (2014). Domestication and Diversification: A Comparative Analysis of the Play Fighting of the Brown Norway, Sprague-Dawley, and Wistar Laboratory Strains of (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 128, 318-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036104
Huck, U. W., & Price, E. O. (1975). Differential Effects of Environmental Enrichment on the Open-Field Behavior of Wild and Domestic Norway Rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 89, 892-898. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0077160
Hughes, C. W. (1975). Early Experience in Domestication. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 88, 407-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0076214
Hughes, C. W., & Boice, R. (1973). Domestication, Sophistication, and Avoidance in Norway Rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 84, 408-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0035285
Jones, M. A., Mason, G., & Pillay, N. (2011). Early Environmental Enrichment Protects Captive-Born Striped Mice against the Later Development of Stereotypic Behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 135, 138-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.08.015
Komorowska, J., & Pisula, W. (2003). Does Changing Levels of Stress Affect the Characteristics of Grooming Behavior in Rats? International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 16, 237-246.
Krech, D., Rosenzweig, M. R., & Bennett, E. L. (1962). Relations between Brain Chemistry and Problem-Solving among Rats Raised in Enriched and Impoverished Environments. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, 801-807. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0044220
Latham, N., & Mason, G. (2010). Frustration and Perseveration in Stereotypic Captive Animals: Is a Taste of Enrichment Worse Than None at All? Behavioural Brain Research, 211, 96-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.03.018
Leggio, M. G., Mandolesi, L., Federico, F., Spirito, F., Ricci, B., Gelfo, F., & Petrosini, L. (2005). Environmental Enrichment Promotes Improved Spatial Abilities and Enhanced Dendritic Growth in the Rat. Behavioural Brain Research, 163, 78-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2005.04.009
Lewis, M. (2004). Environmental Complexity and Central Nervous System Development and Function. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 10, 91-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20017
Lickliter, R., & Ness, J. (1990). Domestication and Comparative Psychology: Status and Strategy. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104, 211-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.104.3.211
Lockard, R. B., & Haerer, H. (1968). Time Course of Change in Light Preference Resulting from Prolonged Exposure to Adapting Stimuli. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 65, 529-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0025825
Mailloux, J. G., Edwards, H. P., Barry, W. F., Rowsell, H. C., & Achorn, E. G. (1974). Effects of Differential Rearing on Cortical Evoked Potentials of the Albino Rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 87, 475-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0036956
Manosevitz, M., & Joel, U. (1973). Behavioral Effects of Environmental Enrichment in Randomly Bred Mice. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 85, 373-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0035041
McCall, R. B., Lester, M. L., & Dolan, C. G. (1969). Differential Rearing and the Exploration of Stimuli in the Open Field. Developmental Psychology, 1, 750-762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0028200
Mitchell, D. (1976). Experiments on Neophobia in Wild and Laboratory Rats: A Reevaluation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 90, 190-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0077196
Moncek, F., Duncko, R., Johansson, B. B., & Jezova, D. (2004). Effect of Environmental Enrichment on Stress Related Systems in Rats. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 16, 423-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2826.2004.01173.x
Morley-Fletcher, S., Rea, M., Maccari, S., & Laviola, G. (2003). Environmental Enrichment during Adolescence Reverses the Effects of Prenatal Stress on Play Behaviour and HPA Axis Reactivity in Rats. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 3367-3374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2003.03070.x
Ottoni, E. B. (2000). EthoLog 2.2: A Tool for the Transcription and Timing of Behavior Observation Sessions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 446-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03200814
Pisula, W. (2003). The Roman High- and Low-Avoidance Rats Respond Differently to Novelty in a Familiarized Environment. Behavioural Processes, 63, 63-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00032-9
Pisula, W. (2004). Response to Novelty in Low-Stress Conditions in Rats. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 35, 99-103. http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.77701953- 5e92-30e6-80bb-834ad95d6230
Pisula, W. (2007). Stimulus and Information Seeking Behavior—A Comparative and Evolutionary Perspective. In L. V. Brown (Ed.), Psychology of Motivation (pp. 167-179). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Pisula, W., Ostaszewski, P., & Matysiak, J. (1992). Effects of Physical Environment and Social Experiences on Stimulus Seeking Behavior and Emotionality in Rats (Rattus norvegicus). International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 5, 124-137.
Pisula, W., Turlejski, K., Stryjek, R., Nalecz-Tolak, A., Grabiec, M., & Djavadian, R. L. (2012). Response to Novelty in the Laboratory Wistar rat, Wild-Captive WWCPS Rat, and the Gray Short-Tailed Opossum (Monodelphis domestica). Behavioural Processes, 91, 145-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2012.06.010
Price, E. O. (1999). Behavioral Development in Animals Undergoing Domestication. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 65, 245-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00087-8
Reinhardt, V. (2003). Compassion for Animals in the Laboratory: Impairment or Refinement of Research Methodology? Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 6, 123-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327604JAWS0602_04
Sackett, G., Novak, M., & Kroeker, R. (1999). Early Experience Effects on Adaptive Behavior: Theory Revisited. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 5, 30-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2779(1999)5:1 3.0.CO;2-J
Stryjek, R. (2008). Devices for Handling Small Mammals in Laboratory Conditions. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 68, 407-413.
Stryjek, R., & Modlinska, K. (2013). A Thigmotaxis-Based Method of Recapturing and Transporting Small Mammals in the Laboratory. Lab Animal, 42, 321-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/laban.328
Stryjek, R., & Pisula, W. (2008). Warsaw Wild Captive Pisula Stryjek Rats (WWCPS)—Establishing a Breeding Colony of Norway Rat in Captivity. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 39, 67-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10059-008-0011-x
Stryjek, R., Modlińska, K., & Pisula, W. (2012). Species Specific Behavioural Patterns (Digging and Swimming) and Reaction to Novel Objects in Wild Type, Wistar, Sprague-Dawley and Brown Norway Rats. PLOS ONE, 7, e40642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040642
Swaisgood, R. R., White, A. M., Zhou, X., Zhang, G., & Lindburg, D. G. (2005). How Do Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) Respond to Varying Properties of Enrichments? A Comparison of Behavioral Profiles among Five Enrichment Items. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119, 325-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.119.3.325
Tanas, L., & Pisula, W. (2011). Response to Novel Object in Wistar and Wild-Type (WWCPS) Rats. Behavioural Processes, 86, 279-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2010.12.018
Tanas, L., & Stryjek, R. (2008). Response to Novelty in Rats Tested in Isolation and in Pairs: Focus on Exploration and Play. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 39, 81-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10059-008-0012-9
Thor, D., Harrison, R., Schneider, R., & Carr, W. (1988). Sex Differences in Investigatory and Grooming Behaviors of Laboratory Rats ( Rattus norvegicus) Following Exposure to Novelty. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 102, 188-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.102.2.188